anyone who thinks they can rip themselves out of Gods arms. and put themselves back in unbelief and hell think this..
I understand the argument.
anyone who thinks they can rip themselves out of Gods arms. and put themselves back in unbelief and hell think this..
I think ,if I may,the error on reasoning is to imply an absolute,as you have there, in an effort to attempt to refute an absolute.
Please explain.
Christians have a specific absolute identity known souly, spelling intended, to God.
OK for now.
Christians are sealed by Holy Spirit. As is referred to in an epistle, we have tasted the heavenly gift.
OK for now.
Knowing how it feels to have God's Spirit within and working within us,speaking to us as we grow in our confidence to let go and hear God, is a precious unique experience for every saint. Because we are in an intimate relationship with the power within all of creation. And he knows our name.
OK for now.
Having that link and being aware of that bond, allows someone within that embrace to speak in the absolute when giving a personal testimony as pertains to the suggestion,we can freely choose to release ourselves from God's intimate embrace.
Such a person can think and say whatever they want but cannot legitimately speak for all others throughout history. You've referenced Heb6 and other Scripture. Do you think Heb6 provides for a Christian to say no one who has tasted the heavenly gift would ever fall away?
I found this perspective concise and well argued. Btw, I am neither a Calvinist or an Arminian…
How can you say you try?
They do not harmonize according to your interpretation.
But I disagree, you have to harmonize,
Jesus said they can never be lost, so all scripture have to harmonize with what jesus said.
if you see somethign that appears tro say they can be lost. then something is wrong.
This is how:
The passages cited previously that seem to support predestination may be harmonized with those supporting free will or perseverance as follows:
1. John 10:27-29 – being “unsnatchable” does not disallow a person from choosing to jump out of the “Father’s hand”. Also, in JN 6:37 “never drive away” does not mean a person cannot go away, and in JN 6:39 “I shall lose none” may refer to those who persevere or do not stray, who stand firm, who endure, who hold firmly, etc.
2. Romans 8:38-39 – “anything else” may refer to powers other than one’s own will.
3. Rom 14:4&10, Paul says not to judge a servant of Jesus, who is able to make them stand before God’s judgment. The verb “make” may mean “provide a way”.
4. 1Cor 1:8, 10:12 & 15:58, Paul says that Jesus will keep the Corinthian believers firm to the end, warns them that if they think they are standing firm to be careful that they don’t fall and therefore, stand firm, letting nothing move them from the work of the Lord. These verses indicate that standing firm involves a believer cooperating with the way Jesus provides.
5. 2Cor 1:20-24, Paul says that God makes us stand firm in Christ and anointed our hearts with the HS as a seal and deposit; it is by faith that we stand firm. This indicates that the way God provides for standing firm is for believers to persevere in cooperating with the HS.
6. Ephesians 1:11-14 – what is “predestined” is God’s plan to choose or elect anyone who desires to be “in him” or to satisfy GRFS. Thus, being “marked in him with a seal” does not abrogate moral free will (cf. 2PT 1:10f).
7. 1 John 2:19 – when synthesized with verse 24 must mean that those who repudiate their Faith do not eternally “belong”.
8. Psalm 135:6 – in light of “volitional verses” (such as DT 30:19 & MT 23:37) means that God “pleases” to permit limited free will.
9. Proverbs 21:1 – in order not to make God responsible for the sins cited in the rest of the chapter must mean that the “king’s heart” or will is choosing to cooperate with the Lord’s “hand” or directions.
You're welcome :^)
Any way I could get you to post verses instead of just references? At times I'd love to read the verses you reference but you reference so many that it's quite a task to go back and forth to the Word and look them up. You provide a wealth of information, but I enjoy a fraction of what you say because it's just too much work to follow through. Or maybe we could ask the forum to go to a more enhanced version with Scripture lookup capabilities. Thoughts?
Looks like some good points here. Has anyone ever taken you up on going through them to try to prove you wrong?
1. John 10:27-29 – being “unsnatchable” does not disallow a person from choosing to jump out of the “Father’s hand”. Also, in JN 6:37 “never drive away” does not mean a person cannot go away, and in JN 6:39 “I shall lose none” may refer to those who persevere or do not stray, who stand firm, who endure, who hold firmly, etc.
I understand, because I have a Bible by my desktop and another by my laptop that I refer to dozens of times a day for replying on CC.
Thus, the Scripture lookup idea is excellent IMO.
Accumulating what I share has taken 50+ years and I add to our website daily, but I really do try not to dump full loads all at once in my replies, believe it or not. And I DO mean OUR website, which I invite everyone to use as a resource: <truthseekersfellowship.com>
I consider your saying that I "reference so many Scriptures that it is challenging to look them up" to be the best compliment I have received on CC. Thanks!
NKJ John 10:27-29:
27 "My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.
- In the context of 10:24-26, Jesus is elaborating on the concept of believing Jesus is the Christ
28 "And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand.
- In context of the time, Jesus' sheep would be the Remnant of Israel
- To hear Jesus' voice is also to heed what He says. Hearing can trend into obeying.
- This may be a simple chiasm:
- My sheep hear My voice,
- and I know them
- and they follow Me
- The chiastic structure would tell us a few things:
- The hearing and following are parallel which shows hearing is also in effect following or explained in following
- It is the ones who hear & follow that Jesus knows, which is the central point here. IOW, He knows only those who hear and follow Him. This "knowing" is knowing personally - relationally - and not a simple knowledge about something.
- NKJ 2 Timothy 2:19 Nevertheless the solid foundation of God stands, having this seal: "The Lord knows those who are His," and, "Let everyone who names the name of Christ depart from iniquity."
- The point being made by referencing both these Scriptures is that the Lord knows those who are His because they obey Him (depart from unrighteousness).
- "Hear" can and does trend into obedience frequently in the Text
- "Follow" can also trend into obedience and is also used to speak about disciples.
- These verbs can be continuous presents - His sheep/men are continually hearing and following (obeying) Him
29 "My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father's hand.
- Jesus gives His hearing, obedient, following men eternal life
- Jesus' hearing, obedient, following men will absolutely not perish into the age
- Not any man will (future) seize Jesus' hearing, obedient, following men from Jesus' hand
So, IMO Jesus' statements as a starting point:
- Jesus' Father has given to Jesus His hearing, obedient, following men
- Jesus' Father is greater than / superior to all men (all men is plural and can mean all men collectively)
- No man is able to seize Jesus' hearing, obedient, following men from His Father's hand.
Is eternal security stated in these verses?
- Do include quite a description of who Jesus' men are.
- Do include assurances from Jesus about He and His Father providing protections for Jesus' hearing, obedient, following men
- Do not say that no man can walk away from Jesus
Why is eternal security in or not in these verses?
Does eternal security have anything to do with Jesus' hearing, obedient, following men?
@GWH this is in response to your comprehensive post, but not just to you should anyone else read it and chime in.
I wonder how much anyone can truly make their case looking at Scripture in some depth vs. doing some simplistic proof-texting (not speaking about you @GWH) and parroting the interpretive tradition they've been taught.
I agree and learned about the chiastic literary device, finding this online:
Many passages in the Bible exhibit chiastic structure. For example, Jesus’ words in Mark 2:27 are in the form of a chiasm: “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.” Using the ABBA form, the words Sabbath and man are repeated in reverse order. Matthew 23:12 is another example.
A longer chiasm is found in Joel 3:17–21. This one has seven parts, diagrammed this way: ABCXCBA. Here is the passage:
“‘Then you will know that I, the Lord your God,
dwell in Zion, my holy hill.
Jerusalem will be holy;
never again will foreigners invade her.
In that day the mountains will drip new wine,
and the hills will flow with milk;
all the ravines of Judah will run with water.
A fountain will flow out of the Lord’s house
and will water the valley of acacias.
But Egypt will be desolate,
Edom a desert waste,
because of violence done to the people of Judah,
in whose land they shed innocent blood.
Judah will be inhabited forever
and Jerusalem through all generations.
Shall I leave their innocent blood unavenged?
No, I will not.’
The Lord dwells in Zion!”
The ideas presented in this prophecy follow this arrangement:
A - God dwells in Zion (verse 17a)
B - Jerusalem is holy (verse 17b)
C - Foreign invaders are banished (verse 17c)
X - The blessings of the Kingdom (verse 18)
C - Foreign enemies are destroyed (verse 19)
B - Jerusalem and Judah are preserved (verses 20–21a)
A - God dwells in Zion (verse 21b)
Other passages that provide examples of chiasms include Ecclesiastes 11:3—12:2; Genesis 6—9; Amos 5:4–6a; Isaiah 1:21–26; and Joshua 1:5–9. Chiastic patterns in the Bible are just one more example of the richness and complexity of God’s inspired Word.
(I am pondering whether I might cite this in the website somewhere :^)
A great brief yet concise teaching.I found this perspective concise and well argued. Btw, I am neither a Calvinist or an Arminian…
I found this perspective concise and well argued. Btw, I am neither a Calvinist or an Arminian…
I guess you are undecided as you learn more relevant Scripture?
You can find Scripture on both sides of the issue harmonized in Lesson 2 of our website <truthseekersfellowship.com>
(Scroll down past the kerygma to the section on perseverance :^)
I know this post was to another, but what did you mean by your question?
Are you familiar with Bob Wilkin who was speaking on the video?
I am not familiar with Bob Wilkin.
My question and reference to our resource website was prompted by FRB72 saying "I am neither a Calvinist or an Arminian".
Above in bold.Romans 8
38. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Above in bold.
The loss of salvation crowd will overlook this. They say they can walk away. They can "jump" out of the Lord Jesus Christs hand....Like they are not part of the CREATION.
They like to call themselves His Sheep. But His sheep NEVER perish. An oxymoron to the utmost.
We CANNOT call ourselves His sheep if we think we can perish.
"Nor anything created" is a better translation. You and I are created. So we cannot separate ourselves from Him. We are His Body. We cannot disembody the Lord Jesus Christ.It's helpful to know what translation is being used. That's quite an interpretation but not a good one. So, FWIW, going from a poor translation to part of the creation isn't sound. And where do you get "jump"?
Thanks.
Neither C nor A but apparently liked the FG interpretation.
Did you watch the video?
Wilkin and his Grace Evangelical Society is staunchly Free Grace Dispensationalism (last I knew and by the video remains).
I think I saw you elsewhere commenting on some of your background knowing of or having had exposure to RBThieme but mainly having time listening to or reading another.
Were you taught things like the perseverance you have on your site, or did such come about from your own studies?