B
What? You cannot find any examples on those pages of God being loving, living, relational, good or personal?
Yours are the special pleading and questions begging fallacies. The language used is the same. If it does not need to mean exhaustive past, present and future knowledge in the case of a man, then it does not need to mean those things in God's case. To insist that it does mean past, present, and future knowledge because it is God we are talking about, and God has exhaustive past, present, and future knowledge is exactly question begging and special pleading.
the point is GOD knows all man does not. God is not limited. Man is. Man who is limited cannot question God's nature. The created doesn't define the Creator. Create any term you like. God is not bound by human rationale.
the point is GOD knows all man does not. God is not limited. Man is. Man who is limited cannot question God's nature. The created doesn't define the Creator. Create any term you like. God is not bound by human rationale.
And yet you are binding God to having to know all the future based on human rationale.the point is GOD knows all man does not. God is not limited. Man is. Man who is limited cannot question God's nature. The created doesn't define the Creator. Create any term you like. God is not bound by human rationale.
Could it be based not only on that, but also based on the way God created each person in the womb?And yet you are binding God to having to know all the future based on human rationale.
Is God bound by his word?
God promises to never change His nature or mind (ML 3:6, PS 110:4), but He is not bound by man's fallible (mis)understanding of His Word.
God does and has repented, changed his mind. God will never repent on the promises he has made concerning his people Israel. Context matters.
And yet you are binding God to having to know all the future based on human rationale.
If someone declares that unless God knows all the future exhaustively He is not worthy of worship as God, they are binding God to an expectation based on a human rationale.unlimited freedom = bondage?
that's a new one
Are you trying to argue that Psalm 139 declares God knows all the future exhaustively?Could it be based not only on that, but also based on the way God created each person in the womb?
No. Now can you answer my question?Are you trying to argue that Psalm 139 declares God knows all the future exhaustively?
OkHeresy? By its definition,yes.
Imo, OT is silly. And worldly. God's actions are conditioned by humans free will? Buahahahaha! No!
If someone declares that unless God knows all the future exhaustively He is not worthy of worship as God, they are binding God to an expectation based on a human rationale.
if i can hide the future from God, i have power over Him, and time is greater than both God and me.