Climate Change

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,655
1,046
113
Absolutely. No different than the APA, which called homosexuality a lifestyle. There are many pseudo-meteorologists.

In global freezing in 1970, you must give up all your freedom and money to stop the world from freezing.

Global warming in 1896 was proposed by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius, later resurfaced in the 1930s and in the 50s; all lies from the pit of hell to get money from people and control their lives with fear.

Now, it's "Climate Change." Oh my, Lions, tigers, and bears, oh my. They took billions from rich kids' lunch money from mommy and daddy. Then, took more from taxes and laws that have us paying for lying devils who can't get water to a Fire Hydrant but want us to think they can control the weather. LOL. If you make no comment on sound Sicene like two genders that has been since the dawn of time, then don't try feeding me lies that you are saying from regurgitated sound bites of people who think there are more than two genders.

FYI, this is a Bible Discussion site, so God's opinion matters most. He said there are only two genders. And Science has not disproved that.
I trust the temperature measurements taken by the government.

There is no other source of daily temperature measurements.

You cannot argue with the Meteorology Department.

As I said before I have no stake in popular social debates.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,120
4,381
113
I trust the temperature measurements taken by the government.

There is no other source of daily temperature measurements.

You cannot argue with the Meteorology Department.

As I said before, I have no stake in popular social debates.
I can very much argue with a lying person who groups who use their position to create a false narrative and hidden agenda. What a hypocrite you say you have no stake in popular social debate but support Global warming that was proven false LOL.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,655
1,046
113
I can very much argue with a lying person who groups who use their position to create a false narrative and hidden agenda. What a hypocrite you say you have no stake in popular social debate but support Global warming that was proven false LOL.
Climate change is an observed change in the temperature readings across the world.

There is no conspiracy, no false narrative, concerning these temperature readings.

There will be all kinds of conspiracies regarding the causes of this worldwide, climate change phenomenon.

But not with the temperature readings themselves as they are just digital thermometer readings.

I have never in my life encountered someone who denied the temperature on a thermometer.

The increasing temperature is a scientific fact and cannot debated, your confused.

I am not a hypocrite if I don't adhere to some political viewpoint.

I am not a hypocrite if I do not take sides on any social debate.

I don't lie because I have nothing to hide.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,024
626
113
Climate change is an observed change in the temperature readings across the world.

There is no conspiracy, no false narrative, concerning these temperature readings.

There will be all kinds of conspiracies regarding the causes of this worldwide, climate change phenomenon.

But not with the temperature readings themselves as they are just digital thermometer readings.

I have never in my life encountered someone who denied the temperature on a thermometer.

The increasing temperature is a scientific fact and cannot debated, your confused.

I am not a hypocrite if I don't adhere to some political viewpoint.

I am not a hypocrite if I do not take sides on any social debate.

I don't lie because I have nothing to hide.
It's hard for me to believe you're really this gullible and place so much faith in such a corrupt system. I expect that from the world, but not from a Christian
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,024
626
113
Find me a meteorologist that disagrees with climate change,
Well there's Bill Gray, who was one of the primary developers of hurricane forecasting, who openly stated gullible warming is a hoax and lost funding because of his opposition to it. He is deceased

Judith Curry was the chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology until she was forced to resign due to her opposition to gullible warming.

Freeman Dyson is a professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study. He also holds the prestigious title as a Fellow of the Royal Society.

Dr. Willie Soon, a climate scientist and co-founder of CERES-Science, claims that gullible warming is a "complete nothing"

Dr. William Happer is a professor emeritus of physics at Princeton University and a specialist in optics and spectroscopy. He is also the chair of the CO2 Coalition, a group that challenges the scientific consensus on climate change, and a former director of energy research at the Department of Energy.

Panel of Broadcast Meteorologists Reject Man-Made Global Warming Fears- Claim 95% of Weathermen Skeptical
https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/i...s-all?ID=CC160863-802A-23AD-4B10-571FFE8F3B76

Why Don’t TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/...warming-john-coleman-james-span-joseph-daleo/

I could do this all night, but don't want to
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,655
1,046
113
Well there's Bill Gray, who was one of the primary developers of hurricane forecasting, who openly stated gullible warming is a hoax and lost funding because of his opposition to it. He is deceased
Although he agreed that global warming was taking place, he argued that humans were only responsible for
a tiny portion and it was largely part of the Earth's natural cycle. (wiki/William_M._Gray)

You named a meteorologist which is what I asked for.

Unfortunately, William Gray recognized that global warming was taking place.

Curry has become known for hosting a blog which is part of the climate change denial blogosphere.[3] Social scientists who have studied Curry's position on climate change have described it as "neo-skepticism", in that her current position includes certain features of denialism; on the one hand, she accepts that the planet is warming, that human-generated greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide cause warming, and that the plausible worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic, but on the other hand she also proposes that the rate of warming is slower than climate models have projected. (wiki/Judith_Curry)

Yet another Meteorologist that agrees with global warming.

Your on my side; thanks for the support.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,024
626
113
Although he agreed that global warming was taking place, he argued that humans were only responsible for
a tiny portion and it was largely part of the Earth's natural cycle. (wiki/William_M._Gray)

You named a meteorologist which is what I asked for.

Unfortunately, William Gray recognized that global warming was taking place.

Curry has become known for hosting a blog which is part of the climate change denial blogosphere.[3] Social scientists who have studied Curry's position on climate change have described it as "neo-skepticism", in that her current position includes certain features of denialism; on the one hand, she accepts that the planet is warming, that human-generated greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide cause warming, and that the plausible worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic, but on the other hand she also proposes that the rate of warming is slower than climate models have projected. (wiki/Judith_Curry)

Yet another Meteorologist that agrees with global warming.

Your on my side; thanks for the support.
You're being disingenuous. None of the ones I mentioned are CO2 alarmists. They believe the slight warming that has been occurring since the end of the Little Ice Age is natural, and nothing to be concerned about. Definitely not caused by man.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,655
1,046
113
You're being disingenuous. None of the ones I mentioned are CO2 alarmists. They believe the slight warming that has been occurring since the end of the Little Ice Age is natural, and nothing to be concerned about. Definitely not caused by man.
Read it again.

"on the one hand, she accepts that the planet is warming, that human-generated greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide cause warming, and that the plausible worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic"

Judith just thinks the rate of warming is slower than is predicted.

Judith definitely attributed G.W to CO2, that human-generated greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide cause warming.

You are being disingenuous with me.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,024
626
113
Read it again.

"on the one hand, she accepts that the planet is warming, that human-generated greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide cause warming, and that the plausible worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic"

Judith just thinks the rate of warming is slower than is predicted.

Judith definitely attributed G.W to CO2, that human-generated greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide cause warming.

You are being disingenuous with me.
Again you're being disingenuous. Read the rest of the article. She's considered a denialist because she doubts that CO2 will have a significant impact on gullible warming
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
38,237
7,073
113
Again you're being disingenuous. Read the rest of the article. She's considered a denialist because she doubts that CO2 will have a significant impact on gullible warming
OK so she thinks that gullible warming will be due to all the hot air on TV, that is fine, but what does she think about Global warming?
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,120
4,381
113
Climate change is an observed change in the temperature readings across the world.

There is no conspiracy, no false narrative, concerning these temperature readings.

There will be all kinds of conspiracies regarding the causes of this worldwide, climate change phenomenon.

But not with the temperature readings themselves as they are just digital thermometer readings.

I have never in my life encountered someone who denied the temperature on a thermometer.

The increasing temperature is a scientific fact and cannot debated, your confused.

I am not a hypocrite if I don't adhere to some political viewpoint.

I am not a hypocrite if I do not take sides on any social debate.

I don't lie because I have nothing to hide.
Anytime you lie and use terms like "Climate Change " to take money from people on false pretenses, that is evil. You're confused.

The earth is thousands of years old, and they do not have enough data to make policies based on fluctuating temperatures.

If you say you are a Follower of Christ and think there are more than two genders or Homosexuality is not a sin, then you are not well-founded in Biblical truth. Yet you believe Climate change can be controlled by taking money from people and have no proof that one can. You have been decieved.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,655
1,046
113
Again you're being disingenuous. Read the rest of the article. She's considered a denialist because she doubts that CO2 will have a significant impact on gullible warming
You call her a denialist but she declared that climate change is real.

The truth is the temperatures are rising globally and that cannot be denied.

As I said before the debate is all about what is causing the temperature to rise.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,655
1,046
113
Anytime you lie and use terms like "Climate Change " to take money from people on false pretenses, that is evil. You're confused.

The earth is thousands of years old, and they do not have enough data to make policies based on fluctuating temperatures.

If you say you are a Follower of Christ and think there are more than two genders or Homosexuality is not a sin, then you are not well-founded in Biblical truth. Yet you believe Climate change can be controlled by taking money from people and have no proof that one can. You have been decieved.
I am not talking about government legislation that a country may be subject to, such as a carbon tax.
That is a problem that the population in any given country must address at the ballot box. Elect members
that you believe will represent your viewpoint. Better still run for government in you electorate and make
sure that the issue is addressed.

I have been following climate change since 1993.

I am a hard nosed skeptic and I do not believe that humanity can stop climate change.

Governments of large industrial countries such as the US cannot afford to act on climate change.
That is an economic reality for the US; it's transport, industry, commercial, is solely based on fossil fuel.
The US like Russia, China, India, Canada, Brazil and Australia, are huge countries. We are not small European
countries that can reduce emissions overnight. Without undergoing a huge fall in their GDP.

That's the reality that obliterates the ideas that ignorant climate activists promote.

In my country a third of our GDP is derived from mining black and brown coal. At the time the
government suggested a climate tax; they were removed from government at the election.
No party in our country mentions a carbon tax anymore. My country is nearly the same size as the US.
We cannot take big climate change steps to reduce emissions unfortunately.

The temperature is rising and that is a fact.

If you devastate the surface of the earth by removing forests which we have been doing seriously, for
two hundred years. Then we will alter the temperature of the earth and you can't argue this.

Add to that, building houses and roads across the surface of the earth. Power plants, concrete buildings,
industry, aircraft, ships, massive production. The temperature at night will rise across the planet. I really
struggle with folk that do not understand the basics of climate change.

The addition of increasing CO2 emissions just speeds up the slow climate change. That was already taking
place on this planet.

I have not been deceived because we have devastated this planet.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,024
626
113
If you devastate the surface of the earth by removing forests which we have been doing seriously, for two hundred years. Then we will alter the temperature of the earth and you can't argue this.
Look into US forest cover 200 years ago compared to now. The eastern half of the counry has far more forest cover than it did them
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
38,237
7,073
113
Look into US forest cover 200 years ago compared to now. The eastern half of the counry has far more forest cover than it did them
That represents a very small percent of the Earth's surface. What is far more important is the 70% of the Earth covered by ocean and the extra CO2 in the atmosphere has acted like fertilizer for the ocean.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
38,237
7,073
113
I am not talking about government legislation that a country may be subject to, such as a carbon tax.
That is a problem that the population in any given country must address at the ballot box. Elect members
that you believe will represent your viewpoint. Better still run for government in you electorate and make
sure that the issue is addressed.

I have been following climate change since 1993.

I am a hard nosed skeptic and I do not believe that humanity can stop climate change.

Governments of large industrial countries such as the US cannot afford to act on climate change.
That is an economic reality for the US; it's transport, industry, commercial, is solely based on fossil fuel.
The US like Russia, China, India, Canada, Brazil and Australia, are huge countries. We are not small European
countries that can reduce emissions overnight. Without undergoing a huge fall in their GDP.

That's the reality that obliterates the ideas that ignorant climate activists promote.

In my country a third of our GDP is derived from mining black and brown coal. At the time the
government suggested a climate tax; they were removed from government at the election.
No party in our country mentions a carbon tax anymore. My country is nearly the same size as the US.
We cannot take big climate change steps to reduce emissions unfortunately.

The temperature is rising and that is a fact.

If you devastate the surface of the earth by removing forests which we have been doing seriously, for
two hundred years. Then we will alter the temperature of the earth and you can't argue this.

Add to that, building houses and roads across the surface of the earth. Power plants, concrete buildings,
industry, aircraft, ships, massive production. The temperature at night will rise across the planet. I really
struggle with folk that do not understand the basics of climate change.

The addition of increasing CO2 emissions just speeds up the slow climate change. That was already taking
place on this planet.

I have not been deceived because we have devastated this planet.
I agree that there is truly nothing the world's nations will do. However, they will use Climate change as an excuse to seize power, impose a digital currency, control what you buy and sell and force worship of the Antichrist or else death. Common sense is no match for the power of their propaganda.