Right. But which one does God recognize and how are we to live in it now? That’s what we’re discussing.
Yes, and as I said, we're not living IN the KOG. We have to get up, go to work, pay taxes, vote, we are still living in this fallen world.
Right. But which one does God recognize and how are we to live in it now? That’s what we’re discussing.
So you think covenants and institutions are the same?
What God established in covenant, man makes into an institution. Man tries to continue the covenant in his own strength, the institution, then, becomes subject to the world.
Like marriage. The covenant of marriage never included man betrothed to man. But the institution permits it, even celebrates it. God does not recognize the man and man as “one flesh” but the institution, by law, does.
One can examine all US institutions in this light and easily see the chasm between the KoG and terrestrial rule: family, business, church, commerce, education, arts, religion, etc. We are not called to refine the institutions, we are light and salt to the people entrapped by them: teaching them how to function within them but to not be of them.
A believer cannot honestly function as a head of any institution in the US because they must swear to uphold the will of the people. A believer is led by the Spirit of God.
Sure, for I don't think the Apostle was having another one of his episodes in folly, but indeed inviting us to be stewards of divine mysteries. I appreciate the adapted term and agree too, but that also is something we are to be stewards of.Why not just clarify the juxtaposition? What was your point based upon your interpretation and use of those Scriptures? FWIW, it seemed to me that all @GWH said is that it was interesting and many interpretations could result. I agreed with that. Would you clarify your point?
Sure, for I don't think the Apostle was having another one of his episodes in folly, but indeed inviting us to be stewards of divine mysteries.
My only exception to that would be a simple questioning of the fuller process, is it possible to grant citizenship to the least of these, my brethren?Well, I was pondering whether vetting immigrants crossing ''the boundaries of their habitation'' (Acts 17:26) contradicted Jesus saying "I was a stranger, and you took Me in.'' (Mt 25:35)
I think not. I think it is wise to vet strangers you are considering taking in.
Well, I was pondering whether vetting immigrants crossing ''the boundaries of their habitation'' (Acts 17:26) contradicted Jesus saying "I was a stranger, and you took Me in.'' (Mt 25:35)
I think not. I think it is wise to vet strangers you are considering taking in.
Sailor, you're the best at this unawareness syndrome.
As i explained to our friend Studier a few pages ago, if we even try to come close to what Jesus taught and try to establish some sort of government or nation based on His teachings and the life that He lived, we need to have open borders and show our other cheek to the enemy. This is the equivalent of communism especially in American culture!
The reason we don't do this, or we can't do this, is because we are not gods to bend the laws of the universe and feed 9 billion people with a loaf of bread and a fish.
So, it's a matter of resources too while we live in this sinful state in this fallen world.
This is why, again, we don't mix politics with God but have it your way. Burger King.
![]()
Well, I was pondering whether vetting immigrants crossing ''the boundaries of their habitation'' (Acts 17:26) contradicted Jesus saying "I was a stranger, and you took Me in.'' (Mt 25:35)
I think not. I think it is wise to vet strangers you are considering taking in.
Yes, and as I said, we're not living IN the KOG. We have to get up, go to work, pay taxes, vote, we are still living in this fallen world.
The Kingdom is within you. So you carry His grace wherever you go. If you can believe it.
The Kingdom is within you. So you carry His grace wherever you go. If you can believe it.
True, I did exercise a certain license with Matt25, still, I find the precept fitsI was pondering why Matt25 is being considered as speaking about borders and immigrants for a few reasons one of which is it would be saying how we treat all immigrants determines if we go into His Kingdom or not. Another reason would be whether or not all immigrants are Christ's brothers.
You would hold the SC Justice in error then?Sailor, you're the best at this unawareness syndrome.
As i explained to our friend Studier a few pages ago, if we even try to come close to what Jesus taught and try to establish some sort of government or nation based on His teachings and the life that He lived, we need to have open borders and show our other cheek to the enemy. This is the equivalent of communism especially in American culture!
The reason we don't do this, or we can't do this, is because we are not gods to bend the laws of the universe and feed 9 billion people with a loaf of bread and a fish.
So, it's a matter of resources too while we live in this sinful state in this fallen world.
This is why, again, we don't mix politics with God but have it your way. Burger King.
![]()
[T]he religion which has introduced civil liberty is the religion of Christ and His apostles… This is genuine Christianity and to this we owe our free constitutions of government. Noah Webster 1843
Isn't that just like every one of us in this godless indoctrination that has been forced upon us and our fathers? The quote was no comparison at all, but the resulting blessing of Christianity. We have fallen so far from the consciences of our founders and conditioned to accept a pluralistic preference rather than to esteem the Savior that it just is no laughing matter. And that esteem was COMMONPLACE. Who would attest to that level of esteem better than the U.S. Congress of their day,Civil Liberty = Christianity?
The quote above equates civil liberty with Christianity.
It says civil liberty EQUALS Christianity.
Provably Untrue:
This is provably untrue.
You can have civil liberty and not even be saved... so civil liberty does not equal Christianity.
Webster & Error:
Noah Webster did a lot of great things, and I appreciate him.
But no amount of appreciation can turn theological errors into facts.
Webster's quote above is lovely, and speaks highly of civil liberty - but it's conclusion is just a very obvious error in theology, mistaking virtues for Christianity.
.
Isn't that just like every one of us in this godless indoctrination that has been forced upon us and our fathers? The quote was no comparison at all, but the resulting blessing of Christianity. We have fallen so far from the consciences of our founders and conditioned to accept a pluralistic preference rather than to esteem the Savior that it just is no laughing matter. And that esteem was COMMONPLACE. Who would attest to that level of esteem better than the U.S. Congress of their day,
''FORASMUCH as it is the indispensable Duty of all Men to adore the superintending Providence of Almighty God; to acknowledge with Gratitude their Obligation to him for benefits received, and to implore such farther Blessings as they stand in Need of; And it having pleased him in his abundant Mercy not only to continue to us the innumerable Bounties of his common Providence, but also to smile upon us in the Prosecution of a just and necessary War, for the Defence and Establishment of our unalienable Rights and Liberties; particularly in that he hath been pleased in so great a Measure to prosper the Means used for the Support of our Troops and to crown our Arms with most signal success:
It is therefore recommended to the legislative or executive powers of these United States, , [that] they may join the penitent Confession of their manifold Sins, whereby they had forfeited every Favour, and their humble and earnest Supplication that it may please GOD, through the Merits of Jesus Christ, mercifully to forgive and blot them out of Remembrance; That it may please him graciously to afford his Blessing on the Governments of these States respectively, , for the promotion and enlargement of that Kingdom which consisteth “in Righteousness, Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost.'' - The Continental Congress, November 1, 1777 for a day of thanksgiving
True, I did exercise a certain license with Matt25, still, I find the precept fits
With the MAGA (Make America Godly Again) movement
I haven't read this before, but I guess it was only a matter of time.