The conversion of the Philippian Jailer in Acts 16.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
757
304
63
#1
Paul and Silas were in a Roman jail. It was about midnight, and they had been praying and singing hymns to God. The other prisoners were listening to them. How much the jailer actually heard is uncertain because he was asleep when an earthquake shook the foundations of the prison and “immediately all the doors were opened and everyone’s chains were loosed.” When he woke up, he saw that all of the doors were open and he thought all of the prisoners had escaped. Roman law demanded that if you were given a prisoner to guard and you let that prisoner escape, it was your life for his; you would be killed. So the jailer drew his sword and was about to kill himself, but Paul called out and said, “ Do yourself no harm, for we are all here.” Then the jailer asked Paul and Silas what he must do to be saved. Before we look at Paul’s answer, let’s notice some things that Paul did NOT say.

Paul did NOT say, “ You don’t have to do anything; God has already done it all.” But that is what men tell people today. Neither did Paul say, “Just repeat the sinner’s prayer and you will be saved.” That is a very popular answer to that question today; again from MEN not God).

Remember that this jailer was a Roman; if he was religious at all he would have Been an idolater. He was a pagan. He knew nothing about Jesus Christ—a Jew who had lived 6000 miles away. He didn’t know who Jesus was or anything about Him. Cold he have heard of Jesus? Possibly, but then Paul would not have had to “speak the word of the Lord to him and to all who were in his house”, which is what the very next verse (32) says. There was no way the Jailer could have been saved at the moment Paul told him to believe. He didn’t know who or what to believe in until he heard what Paul had to say. This verse (31) is used erroneously to teach “faith only” salvation. But a close examination shows that he could not have had faith in Christ at that moment—before he had even known there was a Christ.

So what happened after Paul taught him the “word of the Lord?” He “bore the fruit of repentance” Matthew 3:8, when he took Paul and Silas and “washed their stripes” where they had been beaten by the Roman officials, and IMMEDIATELY, he and all his family were baptized. Here we have someone again, like the Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8) who was taught the gospel of Christ and somehow they all IMMEDIATELY, want to be baptized. How could they know about baptism and why want to be baptized immediately? It had to have been in the teaching that Phillip did in Acts 8 and the teaching that Paul did to the Jailer. In Acts 16. The earthquake happened at midnight. Then Paul taught him the “word of the Lord”— we don’t know how long that took but I can’t imagine he only spent a few minutes telling him about the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, in addition to the man Jesus, faith, and baptism. Then, the Jailer “washed their stripes”. It must have been in the wee hours of the morning by this time. Why insist on being baptized IMMEDIATELY, if baptism is not necessary for salvation? Why even teach about it in the wee hours of the night? They could have easily put it off to a more convenient time—even the next day. These are all questions that need to be given thought and study.


Men today tell people that baptism is not necessary and that you don’t have to be baptized to be saved. But that is not the picture we get from the Bible, both in examples, as in the conversion of the eunuch, the jailer, Saul of Tarsus, and the Jews on Pentecost; and in the commands that we read in the Bible like Acts 2:38, Acts 10:48, and Acts 22:16.

There is one last part of this story that is very important and very “telling.” Read verse 34; after his baptism, the jailer “ rejoiced, having BELIEVED in God with all his household.” This proves that there is MORE to “Believe in the Lord and you shall be saved,” than just “faith”.

IN VERSE 30, the jailer asked “what shall I do to be saved?”
IN VERSE 31, Paul says “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved.”
IN VERSE 32, “ They spoke the word of the Lord to him”
IN VERSE 33, he showed evidence of repentance and was baptized.
IN VERSE 34, “He rejoiced HAVING BELIEVED IN GOD”.

And now you know the “rest of the story.” This is the WHOLE story of how the jailer was saved. Beware of men who would tell you a DIFFERENT story of the jailer’s salvation.
 
Nov 14, 2024
1,088
762
113
#2
Paul and Silas were in a Roman jail. It was about midnight, and they had been praying and singing hymns to God. The other prisoners were listening to them. How much the jailer actually heard is uncertain because he was asleep when an earthquake shook the foundations of the prison and “immediately all the doors were opened and everyone’s chains were loosed.” When he woke up, he saw that all of the doors were open and he thought all of the prisoners had escaped. Roman law demanded that if you were given a prisoner to guard and you let that prisoner escape, it was your life for his; you would be killed. So the jailer drew his sword and was about to kill himself, but Paul called out and said, “ Do yourself no harm, for we are all here.” Then the jailer asked Paul and Silas what he must do to be saved. Before we look at Paul’s answer, let’s notice some things that Paul did NOT say.

Paul did NOT say, “ You don’t have to do anything; God has already done it all.” But that is what men tell people today. Neither did Paul say, “Just repeat the sinner’s prayer and you will be saved.” That is a very popular answer to that question today; again from MEN not God).

Remember that this jailer was a Roman; if he was religious at all he would have Been an idolater. He was a pagan. He knew nothing about Jesus Christ—a Jew who had lived 6000 miles away. He didn’t know who Jesus was or anything about Him. Cold he have heard of Jesus? Possibly, but then Paul would not have had to “speak the word of the Lord to him and to all who were in his house”, which is what the very next verse (32) says. There was no way the Jailer could have been saved at the moment Paul told him to believe. He didn’t know who or what to believe in until he heard what Paul had to say. This verse (31) is used erroneously to teach “faith only” salvation. But a close examination shows that he could not have had faith in Christ at that moment—before he had even known there was a Christ.

So what happened after Paul taught him the “word of the Lord?” He “bore the fruit of repentance” Matthew 3:8, when he took Paul and Silas and “washed their stripes” where they had been beaten by the Roman officials, and IMMEDIATELY, he and all his family were baptized. Here we have someone again, like the Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8) who was taught the gospel of Christ and somehow they all IMMEDIATELY, want to be baptized. How could they know about baptism and why want to be baptized immediately? It had to have been in the teaching that Phillip did in Acts 8 and the teaching that Paul did to the Jailer. In Acts 16. The earthquake happened at midnight. Then Paul taught him the “word of the Lord”— we don’t know how long that took but I can’t imagine he only spent a few minutes telling him about the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, in addition to the man Jesus, faith, and baptism. Then, the Jailer “washed their stripes”. It must have been in the wee hours of the morning by this time. Why insist on being baptized IMMEDIATELY, if baptism is not necessary for salvation? Why even teach about it in the wee hours of the night? They could have easily put it off to a more convenient time—even the next day. These are all questions that need to be given thought and study.


Men today tell people that baptism is not necessary and that you don’t have to be baptized to be saved. But that is not the picture we get from the Bible, both in examples, as in the conversion of the eunuch, the jailer, Saul of Tarsus, and the Jews on Pentecost; and in the commands that we read in the Bible like Acts 2:38, Acts 10:48, and Acts 22:16.

There is one last part of this story that is very important and very “telling.” Read verse 34; after his baptism, the jailer “ rejoiced, having BELIEVED in God with all his household.” This proves that there is MORE to “Believe in the Lord and you shall be saved,” than just “faith”.

IN VERSE 30, the jailer asked “what shall I do to be saved?”
IN VERSE 31, Paul says “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved.”
IN VERSE 32, “ They spoke the word of the Lord to him”
IN VERSE 33, he showed evidence of repentance and was baptized.
IN VERSE 34, “He rejoiced HAVING BELIEVED IN GOD”.

And now you know the “rest of the story.” This is the WHOLE story of how the jailer was saved. Beware of men who would tell you a DIFFERENT story of the jailer’s salvation.
Amen.

When it comes to what Paul spoke to the Philippian jailer and his household, we can rest assured that it was in line with this.

Act 26:13
At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.
Act 26:14
And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
Act 26:15
And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.
Act 26:16
But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;
Act 26:17
Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,
Act 26:18
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
Act 26:19
Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:
Act 26:20
But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance.

Based upon his own testimony, we know that Paul told people everywhere that he went that they needed to turn from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they might receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them who are sanctified by faith in Christ. This faith in Christ most definitely includes to need to repent and turn to God, and the need to do works meet for or worthy of repentance.

This won't stop the mockers and scoffers though. In other words, many professing Christians will still insist otherwise while railing against those who uphold such foundational biblical truths.
 
Nov 14, 2024
1,088
762
113
#4
GRACE! GRACE! WONDERFUL GRACE!
Tit 2:11
For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,
Tit 2:12
Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world;
Tit 2:13
Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;
Tit 2:14
Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.
Tit 2:15
These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.
 

wattie

Senior Member
Feb 24, 2009
3,285
1,180
113
New Zealand
#5
People were baptized pretty much sraight away then. Not because it was part of their salvation, but because people were much less hesitant about it.

Water baptism for salvation is not a christian doctrine. Its a sign of a cult.

Read the book of John and try to find water baptism in it.

What about Romans 10?

John chapter 3..mention of water.. is amniotic fluid of the womb because that is what the subject is.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,733
2,687
113
#6
People were baptized pretty much sraight away then. Not because it was part of their salvation, but because people were much less hesitant about it.

Water baptism for salvation is not a christian doctrine. Its a sign of a cult.

Read the book of John and try to find water baptism in it.

What about Romans 10?

John chapter 3..mention of water.. is amniotic fluid of the womb because that is what the subject is.

Agree there is something very cultic about adding baptism as part of salvation, it makes salvation a work of human hands.
 
Nov 14, 2024
1,088
762
113
#8
Agree there is something very cultic about adding baptism as part of salvation, it makes salvation a work of human hands.
It is not cultic at all. Instead, it is the answer of a good conscience towards God.

1Pe 3:18
For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
1Pe 3:19
By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;
1Pe 3:20
Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
1Pe 3:21
The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
1Pe 3:22
Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him.

Anyone who is truly seeking salvation through Christ, and who truly understands (conscience or with knowledge) the significance of Christ's resurrection and ascension, and how it pertains to angels, authorities, and powers being made subject unto him, will, in good conscience, be water baptized.

Those who do not possess such knowledge may not see the significance of water baptism, but it is significant, nonetheless.

Also, those who do possess such knowledge, yet refuse to be water baptized, are giving the wrong answer of a bad conscience towards God.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,018
626
113
#12
Are you also of the humble opinion that John's baptizing of all the rest of Israel for
"induction into the [ Levitical? ] priesthood"?
No because it was a baptism unto John, not Christ, There are no Levitical priests in the NT. The baptism into Jesus I guess should be considered a formal induction into the Melchizedek priesthood.
 
Feb 22, 2021
3,316
1,703
113
Midwest
#13
No because it was a baptism unto John, not Christ, There are no Levitical priests in the NT. The baptism into Jesus I guess should be considered a formal induction into the Melchizedek priesthood.
So, then for this to be fulfilled...:

"And ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are​
the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel." (Exodus 19:6 AV)​
...then there would be Israel as a "kingdom of Melchizedek priests", with Christ as
their High Priest, Correct?

Is that to be fulfilled in the Millennial kingdom, in your humble opinion?
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,018
626
113
#14
So, then for this to be fulfilled...:

"And ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are​
the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel." (Exodus 19:6 AV)​
...then there would be Israel as a "kingdom of Melchizedek priests", with Christ as
their High Priest, Correct?

Is that to be fulfilled in the Millennial kingdom, in your humble opinion?
Yes, priests of the order of Melchizedek composed of all nations, right here, right now and on into the millennium
 
Feb 22, 2021
3,316
1,703
113
Midwest
#15
Nov 1, 2024
2,018
626
113
#16
Precious friend, respectfully disagree, as I cannot find Paul teaching us that "we are priests",
.
Peter and John did.

Made us a kingdom, priests [to] God, and to [the] father of him; to him [be] the glory and the might into the eons of the eons. Amen. Revelation 1:6
And you made them kings and priests [to] our God and they reign upon the earth. Revelation 5:10
But ye [are] a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: 1 Peter 2:9
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,018
626
113
#17
Precious friend, respectfully disagree, as I cannot find Paul teaching us that "we are priests",
imho:

Amen.
btw per you link, what God said in Exodus 19:6 was forfeited and postponed after Israel broke the covenant. That is why the Levitical priesthood was brought in. Exodus 19:6 is fulfilled in all of those who are in Christ

And ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel. Exodus 19:6
 
Feb 22, 2021
3,316
1,703
113
Midwest
#18
...Paul did NOT say...
Thank you:

The other things Paul did NOT say!: Neither "...he that believeth and is baptized
shall be saved..." (Mark 16:16 to the twelve), Nor Peter's: "...Repent, and be baptized
every one of you in The Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall
receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." (Acts 2:38 AV still to twelve). And:

Even before "the jailer's salvation" we can see God's Interruption of Peter's message/
/above Commands: about The Judge [ Jesus ] of the quick and dead (Acts 10:42):

"To Him give all the prophets witness, that Through His Name whosoever believeth
in Him shall receive remission of sins. While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy​
Ghost fell on all them which heard the word..."​
Now, this is interesting: Did The Holy Ghost Prompt Peter to Change here, so that In
God's New Dispensation Of Grace, The Holy Spirit Can Now Save the ungodly "By faith"?
"...And they of the circumcision which believed..."​
[ and "were Already baptized/Forgiven, per above commands to the twelve ]​
"...were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles​
also Was Poured Out The Gift of the Holy Ghost. For they heard them speak with​
tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, Can any man forbid water, that​
these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?"​
(Acts 10:43-47 AV)​
Well, we have An Important Doctrinal Decision here, do we not?:

Were "these First Gentiles Saved By God When they BELIEVED", or, according
to some, After they were water baptized?

Thus, here, and in Paul's Grace Letters Of God's Love To Gentiles, we see ' what',
Exactly
?

A) Is it God Does NOT Save one When He "Gives them The Gift Of The Holy Ghost"
and they { the UNsaved??? } "speak in tongues AND magnify God" [ Never heard​
of 'that doctrine' ]​
or: B)

1) God Saved them here By [ belief, ] Giving them "The Gift Of The Holy Ghost"
before water baptism:​
a) which, among other 'changes' in God's Transition From Law TO GRACE,
diminishes here on out = NONE after Acts 19.​
b) And, of course Peter asked about water, because "that Was Commanded​
In his own commission (Matthew 28:19-20 AV), Correct?​
c) Did Peter acknowledge that God Was Doing Something Different in his​
"recounting of 'the First Gentiles Salvation'"? His Very words, eh?:
"And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said​
unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago​
God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should​
hear the word of the gospel, and believe.​
And God, Which Knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, Giving them
The Holy Ghost, even as He Did Unto us;
And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by
faith. Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck​
of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?​
But we believe that Through The Grace of The Lord Jesus Christ we
Shall Be Saved, even as they [ were Saved? ]" (Acts 15:7-11 AV)​
Thus, he Verily Verily 'acknowledged' TWICE, That God Was Doing
Something Different, Correct?​
Thus, Again And Again, we humbly ask the critics of God's "Grace Through faith"
Salvation, The One and Most Important Question: "What Must we do, Today,
Under Grace, Do To Be Saved, eh?​
2) Christ, In His Hidden Mystery, Revealed to Paul:​
"GRACE Through faith" [ ONLY ], Biblically Confirmed By:
C) Some of the things Paul DID say, Through Christ, TO us:

1) Grace, Grace Through faith, NOT of ourselves NOR of works​
(Ephesians 2:5, 8-9 AV)​
2) Romans 3-5 AV:​
"...him which believeth" is "Justified Freely By His Grace", "boasting Excluded!"​
By What?: = The New "Law of faith" [ NO water = ], "Justified BY FAITH, Without
the deeds of the law..."​
"...One God Shall Justify [ Both ] the circumcision {Jews} And the Uncircumcision​
(Gentiles)..." By What?: = "...By faith!...",
"Now to him that worketh is the reward NOT Reckoned Of GRACE, but of​
debt. But to him that worketh NOT, but believeth On Him That Justifieth
the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness." (ch 4:4-5 AV)​
"...God Imputeth righteousness Without works...iniquities Are Forgiven...
The LORD Will NOT Impute sin..."​
"...Therefore of faith, By GRACE...":
RIGHTEOUSNESS!:
"...for us Also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on Him That
Raised Up Jesus our LORD From the dead ; Who Was Delivered * For
our offences, and Was Raised Again For our Justification."
(Romans 4:24-25 AV)​
* Because Of Christ's ALL-Sufficient Work On The Cross! Amen?​

NOT by "works of righteousness!" But, By MERCY, and The Washing and
Regeneration of The Holy Ghost! (Titus 3:4-7 AV etc, etc, etc In God's
Mystery! Amen? ) and, Also:​

"And if By Grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise Grace is no more​
Grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more Grace: otherwise work is​
no more work." (Romans 11:6 AV)​
If one would but prayerfully and Carefully read and re-read Romans Through
Philemon, All of things That Paul DID say, they could not help but Notice God's:

GRACE Is in them 70 Times!! How Much Plainer And Clearer Can God Get, eh?​

Christ Further Revealed, In His Mystery To Paul: The "Age Of GRACE" Now Has ONLY!:
ONE Baptism! [ Definitely NOT water !! ] = ONE [ Spiritual ] Baptism!

Further, God Teaches, Through Paul:

a) THE One "apostle TO the Gentiles" (Romans 11:13 AV) = Yes, we do magnify
Paul's office, NOT "lifting him ABOVE Jesus" [ critics' accusations ], and:​
b) Also our 'pattern!' (1 Timothy 1:16 AV), For us, teaches:​

c)​
"If any man teach otherwise, and consent not To Wholesome Words, even​
The Words of our LORD Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according​
to godliness" (1 Timothy 6:3 cp Galatians 1:11-12; 1 Corinthians 14:37;​
2 Corinthians 13:3; 1 Thessalonians 2:13; and Ephesians 3:2-5 AV)​
Which, of course, raises another Important Eternal [ which to "follow for rewards" ]
question:
Amen.

continued below...
 
Feb 22, 2021
3,316
1,703
113
Midwest
#20
What Paul DID say!

Continued from above:

Further Rightly Divided studies:

Basic Distinctions (14 +) Of Prophecy vs Mystery!

[ Update/Additions #’s: (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) ]

In Accordance with God's Command To all His ambassadors, eh?:

"...to make all men see what is The Fellowship Of The Mystery, Which from​
the beginning of the world hath been Hid In God, Who Created all things​
By Jesus Christ" (Ephesians 3:9 AV)​
Study Rightly Divided.png