One of the graphs is Tornado (EF 3) count over time.
Why a count on EF 3 tornadoes only?
Seems like cherry picking to me.
Why not a total count of tornadoes by year?
wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_tornado_events_by_year
Since the 1980s the tornado count has increased not decreased.
It feels real for every samoan and pacific islanders. The pacific islands are having massive issues with rising sea levels. Now its schools and individual houses, hopefully in the near future it isn't the entire islands people call home.
Yep, the earth has many systems that will help bring it back to homeostasis. If the ocean currents stop running and that is a real possibility then you stop pumping heat from the equatorial oceans to the arctic oceans. But they overplayed it with these theories about a new ice age. That is probably very unlikely result. The chances of that happening probably as unlikely as seeing snow in New Orleans.Anybody remember when scientists were predicting a new ice age. The scientific evidence presented was undeniable.!
We're all going to FREEZE!!!!!!!!!
If your not old enough to remember this then view this. .
It feels real for every samoan and pacific islanders. The pacific islands are having massive issues with rising sea levels. Now its schools and individual houses, hopefully in the near future it isn't the entire islands people call home.
No. When the jet stream is strong it keeps the vortex confined to the pole. When it weakens it meanders which allows the vortex to infiltrate lower latitutdes.
Some Pacific islands are experiencing increased sea levels because of ground subsidence, not becaause of an increased rate of sea level rise
The science apparently is not settled on the polar vortex or the polar jet stream.
Not much anyone can say on this subject.
Seeing all the news about Trump thinking we need Greenland because the melting Ice is becoming an open lane that Russia could use do you think Greenland is subsiding or rising in altitude?
Yes, that would be called isostatic rebound.I haven't been keeping up with it , but a quick search suggests Greenland is rising
Yes, that would be called isostatic rebound.
Neither. It is a hoax perpetuated by the radial left media.Human or Divinely Inspired??
First off yes it was wasted.Wasted? Do you really think the money was wasted? You have some of the most incompetent people making 700k a year, I think they would beg to differ, that money sent their kids to private school and not some failing public school, they were able to afford vacations in Europe, I doubt those that got the money would agree that it was wasted. Instead I think what the Bible would say is they are worthless shepherds that feed themselves and let the sheep burn up in the fire.
Do you have the temperature data for the last twenty years, so I can analyze your data?
According to the organizations that analyze temperature data from countries around the world.
Also from satellite data around the world.
The temperature has been rising steadily for the last 50 years.
If you do not supply an alternate source for the temperature data for the last 50 years.
Then I would assume that you are making a false claim, one that is not based on hundreds
of weather stations. From each country around the world.
There is a difference between authentic temperature data and someone's opinion!
Digital thermometers were employed in many countries in the seventies. So temperature readings
these days are in the thousands of temperature readings a day. I believe there are over 17,000 weather
stations around the globe now.
If you do have a private source for temperature data then you have nothing.
LOL, you are getting data from biased sources. I guess you think there are more than two genders, too?
By using the phrase, "biased sources", are you inferring that government meteorology departments,
from all over the world exhibit a bias?
For sure, brother.Facts wise.. accelerated warming looks like it is happening. But the question is weather natural cycles of the earth are being accelerated by man made problems or whether that affect is minimal.
The majority of scientists agree man made problems are accelerating it.
The thing is though..when you bring God into the equation, it changes things drastically.
It is up to God's plan how the earth ends.. not man's own stewardship.
By using the phrase, "biased sources", are you inferring that government meteorology departments,
from all over the world exhibit a bias?
I make no comment on gender, as it's none of my business.