What does Biden, Harris or the Democrats have to with who Trump is as a person?
It is all connected.
What does Biden, Harris or the Democrats have to with who Trump is as a person?
Hey TB,What does Biden, Harris or the Democrats have to with who Trump is as a person?
So they are responsible for Trump's bad character and wrongdoings?It is all connected.
So they are responsible for Trump's bad character and wrongdoings?
First Trump's victory wasn't all that massive. Many men always imagine things being bigger than they really are to puff up their ego.Hey TB,
I see you changed your profile pic from that leftist lunatic Dinero, after the phone smashing video of Bobby finding out aboutTrump's massive victory!
What the heck is that new pic?
Some Freemason voodoo jazz?
If you did, you wouldn't be asking such pejorative questions.I stated "connected" but you need to hyper focus on Trump's bad character because that serves your polemical position.
We understand, really we do.
Hey TB,
I see you changed your profile pic from that leftist lunatic Dinero, after the phone smashing video of Bobby finding out aboutTrump's massive victory!
What the heck is that new pic?
Some Freemason voodoo jazz?
If you did, you wouldn't be asking such pejorative questions.
First Trump's victory wasn't all that massive. Many men always imagine things being bigger than they really are to puff up their ego.
Robert deNiro is not only an acting legend, but he obviously can see through the hypocrisy and propaganda of a celebrity that has no business being in politics.
As for my avatar, you might want to go to a museum, watch a PBS episode or pic up a copy of National Geographic once in a while
He is unhinged, that is what happens to people who let hate fester in their hearts, yes even towards politicians.
That's true, but you do gotta admit that's why he played Taxi Driver role pretty bang on.
He is an very good actor, sad to watch him rant and rave though.
As if Trump's policies even have any affect on him personally.
I highly doubt any of these Holly weird types are capable of any independent thought or analysis if they do, they are banished
Or it could be righteous indignation.He is unhinged, that is what happens to people who let hate fester in their hearts, yes even towards politicians.
So facts can be considered an irrational argument?
Or it could be righteous indignation.
Many are of us privy to the potential threats of the incoming administration.
Judgment for what? Existing? Most of those people who have their homes destroyed had nothing to do with anything you're talking about. I bet if it was your house it burned down. You wouldn't be sitting here. Talking about it was God's judgmentThis is the day of the Lord. This fire in LA started on January 7th which is the end of the Christmas season according to the Eastern Orthodox and Julian calendar. I think we are now seeing the Lord's judgment on the US. Ever since 2021 when they mandated the vaccine things have not returned to normal, on the contrary the birth pains have gotten more frequent and more intense. In 2023 Hamas invaded Israel, in 2024 they were threatening nuclear war regularly and the drone swarms began their invasions as well as hypersonic missiles and ICBMs.
I think Christmas depicts it coming like a thief in the night.
Supporting and believing someone like Trump is not what the Bible meant by having a "servant's heart".
https://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/bible-verses-about-the-servants-heart/
Posting multiple definitions of a phrase in other languages is not a superstition or fallacy.Using facts that are irrelevant to an argument's thesis constitutes an irrational argument.
A- It is irrational to take an English acronym (with a known etymology and meaning) then find words in other languages that sound the same (with entirely different etymologies and meanings) and then use those words to redefine the English.
(We could call this a kind of "phonetic" fallacy, and we see it used all over the internet to support occultism, superstitions etc..)
B- Your argument is an ad hoc argument, and a complete non sequitur... multiple logical fallacies.
C- Your argument isn't logic, it is superstition.
.
.
The dilemma lies with those who support him.You clearly don't like Trump being president:
so how is arguing with us, AFTER Trump is elected, going to solve your dilemma?
.