And oh brother how the Calvintes assiduously tip-toe around that land mine!They are predestined because He decided in His sovereignty to NOT bequeath them regeneration.
Right @Cameron143 ?
I mean thats ground zero right?
And oh brother how the Calvintes assiduously tip-toe around that land mine!They are predestined because He decided in His sovereignty to NOT bequeath them regeneration.
No it's not. I just showed you why. You want it to be so badly that you have no problem deliberately and dishonesty misrepresenting both scripture and others.It is the logical end of your system of regeneration (God given yes) but preceding belief.
God's sovereignty gets derided in these discussions... is His omniscience being downgraded as well???It makes a difference because He foreknew them before creation. They were already chosen in Christ before they came into being.
It's not my position that anyone was predestined to destruction. Men are suited to destruction through their own actions. Given the corrupt nature due to sin, God has no need to predestine man to destruction. It is his default condition.
You are just as dishonest as she is.And oh brother how the Calvintes assiduously tip-toe around that land mine!
Right @Cameron143 ?
I mean thats ground zero right?
You misrepresented me and my beliefs. So many have presented such mangled versions of what I believe it's ridiculous. Absolute falsehoods again and again. But according to them they understand what I believe. They don't even bother to ask. They just present lie after lie after lie.We constantly get accused of misrepresenting their beliefs.
And oh brother how the Calvintes assiduously tip-toe around that land mine!
I don't have a problem with those who believe differently from me. This is to be expected. But those who deliberately misrepresent another's positions are simply dishonest.God's sovereignty gets derided in these discussions... is His omniscience being downgraded as well???
Again, you are missing the IN CHRIST part.It makes a difference because He foreknew them before creation. They were already chosen in Christ before they came into being.
It's not my position that anyone was predestined to destruction. Men are suited to destruction through their own actions. Given the corrupt nature due to sin, God has no need to predestine man to destruction. It is his default condition.
I’m not really getting that from anyone here honestly I’m not really following everything everyone is saying but enjoy your day of work sister you are a blessing !!Eh? Really? No, I am saying that by insisting that as a natural man they have a will that is free, which is nowhere taught in the Bible by the way, because what the Bible actually teaches is the natural man is a lover of darkness who suppresses the truth, being a slave to sin taken captive to the will of the devil, etc. By denying these and other verses regarding man's natural estate and ability they claim they were able to do something as a natural man because of their free will when it is Jesus Who sets us free, expressly articulated in the Bible, salvation is by the will and desire of God, not the desire or effort of man. Yeah, they give themselves the credit and further make lots of noise about how man is not as bad as the Bible makes him out to be. Their pride stamp is all over it.
Yea it’s happening on both sides because they aren’t understanding what the other people are sayingI don't have a problem with those who believe differently from me. This is to be expected. But those who deliberately misrepresent another's positions are simply dishonest.
Totally agree.This thread would be done if they owned up to it.
Seriously? And what are those "actions?" To repent and believe. Same as with us today. Are you being difficult on purpose, or do you genuinely not understand these simple truths?And yet the passage you quote has men choosing life or death based on their actions. How is that faith?
The Bible gives revelation progressively. This doesn't mean what is being revealed isn't already true. Salvation hasn't changed. It was always by grace through faith. It has always involved the Spirit and a new heart.
How is God's sovereignty allegedly getting derided here?God's sovereignty gets derided in these discussions... is His omniscience being downgraded as well???
Thank you again Zeke but I find it very odd that you're not getting that from anyone here because free will... you know, that false doctrine of free will, is at the heart of everything they argue to deny everything Scripture says about the natural man. And there are quite a few here doing it so I'm not sure how you can miss it.I’m not really getting that from anyone here honestly I’m not really following everything everyone is saying but enjoy your day of work sister you are a blessing !!
No it's not. I just showed you why. You want it to be so badly that you have no problem deliberately and dishonesty misrepresenting both scripture and others.
I asked if it was... are you saying it isn't? Oh I see , you are saying it is the people you disagree with who do this. Is there any point in me asking you questions when you did not answer any of mine that I put to you earlier ... and now you are asking me questions ... I don't see this as a fair way to have any kind of good faith dialogue.How is God's sovereignty allegedly getting derided here?
God, in his sovereignty, gave man the right to freely choose.
It really is that simple, and if anybody is deriding God's sovereignty, then it the Calvinists who deny this reality.
Yes, I am saying that God's sovereignty is not being derided here by non-Calvinists. Do you know what the differences between a sovereign and a dictator are? Are people allowed to vote (make choices) in a sovereignty?I asked if it was... are you saying it isn't? Oh I see it is only the people you disagree with who do this. Is there any point in me asking you questions when you did not answer any of mine that I put to you earlier ... and now you are asking me questions ... I don't see this as a fair way to have any kind of good faith dialogue.
This really is how I feel tooAgain, you are missing the IN CHRIST part.
By way of analogy, consider Noah's ark. The wickedness of men was great in those days, and God, in his foreknowledge, was not caught unaware of the same. Instead, he foreknew, from before the foundation of the world, that it would eventually be so. At that time, God's Spirit was not only striving with men, but we also know that Noah was a preacher of righteousness. In other words, God was actively seeking, via his Spirit and the preaching of righteousness, to save everybody. Furthermore, God provided a "chosen" or "elected" means of escape, which he foreknew from before the foundation of the world, or he chose Noah's Ark. In his foreknowledge, he knew who would favorably respond to the promptings of his Spirit and the preaching of righteousness, and he also foreknew who would unfavorably reject the same, but he still genuinely strove with everybody. Those who got on the Ark did so of their own freewill choices, and those who did not board the Ark chose not to of their own freewill choices. With these things in mind, we could rightfully say that God foreknew who was going to be found "in the Ark" before the foundation of the world, and, similarly, God foreknew who was going to be found IN CHRIST before the foundation of the world. This does not mean that God chose who was going to be in either the Ark or Christ, but simply that he foreknew who would be.
I honestly cannot believe that we even have to have such a discussion. Can I tell you, plainly, what this whole discussion reminds me of?
Before I got saved, I spent some time at the racetrack. One night, a man placed a $100 bill on the floor with a hidden invisible wire attached to it. He then stood there for about an hour while sadistically and gleefully watching people bend over hastily to grab the $100 dollar bill, only to have it snatched away from their grasp at the last second. I actually saw one man go for it with such fervor that he did a somersault on his head before crashing his body onto the floor as the $100 bill was snatched away from his outreaching grasp at the last second.
This is Calvin's "god."
He puts the gift of salvation before certain unsaved people via the preaching of the gospel, and then he sadistically and gleefully pulls it away from their grasp because they never really had a chance to lay hold of it. Calvin's "god" is not the God of the Bible, and he is certainly not my "god." I REPUDIATE Calvin's "god" with every fiber of my being.
Only 1 side is deliberately misrepresenting.Yea it’s happening on both sides because they aren’t understanding what the other people are saying