I have posted the NT verses showing God gives FAITH to those He chooses
("I will bless whomever I wish and I will curse whomever I wish", etc.).
As He chooses after, He alone knows who accepted His drawing, and those who rejected!
SBS!
I have posted the NT verses showing God gives FAITH to those He chooses
("I will bless whomever I wish and I will curse whomever I wish", etc.).
You have the first mover Call-er transmitting the "signal" and the reactionary call-ees, the responders, who "receive" it and then call upon Him in return by asking for that promised grace which, as a result of the plea, is then granted.I have posted the NT verses showing God gives FAITH to those He chooses
("I will bless whomever I wish and I will curse whomever I wish", etc.).
Jesus says Father God must DRAW (compel, drag) people to Him,
and these people He will accept.
"No one can (is able to) come to Me unless the Father who sent Me
draws (Greek: compels, draws) him" (John 6:44)
Butski, IMO, these people still have the free will to reject this grace!
If your real question is whether I fail at exercising love at times, I do. If you want me to comment on the behavior of others, I already have. Poor behavior is always wrong. In general, the use of such terms, even if accurate, doesn't lead to peace.
We've all felt we have been misjudged or misrepresented. And we would all be better off trying to explain our positions more fully. But if that fails, it should be enough that the Lord knows our hearts. We should love our enemies, bless those that curse us, do good to them that hate us, and pray for those that abuse and persecute us. The extent to which we resist this is a reminder of just how little we are like Christ.
We generally think that people are placed in our lives to reveal truth to them. More likely, they are placed there to reveal the truth concerning us.
I have posted the NT verses showing God gives FAITH to those He chooses
("I will bless whomever I wish and I will curse whomever I wish", etc.).
The "real question" is whether TULIP-sim is a heresy or not.If your real question is whether I fail at exercising love at times, I do. If you want me to comment on the behavior of others, I already have. Poor behavior is always wrong. In general, the use of such terms, even if accurate, doesn't lead to peace.
We've all felt we have been misjudged or misrepresented. And we would all be better off trying to explain our positions more fully. But if that fails, it should be enough that the Lord knows our hearts. We should love our enemies, bless those that curse us, do good to them that hate us, and pray for those that abuse and persecute us. The extent to which we resist this is a reminder of just how little we are like Christ.
We generally think that people are placed in our lives to reveal truth to them. More likely, they are placed there to reveal the truth concerning us.
I'm still under the impression that all things are possible with God.Its complicated and not really solvable especially on a discussion board.
I'm still under the impression that all things are possible with God.
I'm still under the impression that all things are possible with God.
And that saying came out of a discussion Jesus had with His disciples who had exclaimed, who then can inherit eternal life? With man it is impossible, Jesus' meaning is clear but many muddy it and say the opposite, with man it is possible, and God is not necessarily required.I'm still under the impression that all things are possible with God.
Well let me help you out:The "real question" is whether TULIP-sim is a heresy or not.
The critical matter at hand being whether such a doctrine stifles the gospel message.
And whether such a doctrine rightly glorifies God or not.
And you thought Calvinists were pessimistic?Perhaps possible but not probable.
And you thought Calvinists were pessimistic?
Sure, it would only apply to things that remain possible, and not restricted or prohibited by God. Surely you know this doesn't apply to the content of the current discussion.But, not will all people.
For it was possible that Lucifer could have been God's most esteemed angel forever.
Aaaaahhhh no. Actually no. I don't think so.Well let me help you out:
...both camps have their version of TULIP. Both camps are made up of fallible humans who are sincerely trying to understand and glorify God.
...both camps have the same gospel...Jesus Christ and Him crucified.
What do you believe the result to be if Jesus destroys all the works of the devil?I am not a pessimist, I am a realist and I know how complicated people are, unlike some who make all people into a little
pre-determined one dimensional Flat Stanley.
Not sure how you meant the statement but most people tend to stay in their indoctrination, few escape but those who test themselves to see if they are in the faith, they might.
And I read no where in scripture where we are heading towards utopia here on earth, so I am a realist.
They think nothing of downgrading God's omnipotence.And you thought Calvinists were pessimistic?
What do you believe the result to be if Jesus destroys all the works of the devil?
Agree insofar as this present condition and state of prophetic fulfillment.And I read no where in scripture where we are heading towards utopia here on earth, so I am a realist.