That's what you cane up with?
Bummer to be you.
Yeah...I came up with that from the larger context 2Kings passage you quoted. The man with the axe problem was a prophet of God like Elisha! Prove me wrong!
That's what you cane up with?
Bummer to be you.
It is not doublespeak. All moral entities (including God!) have only the ability to make choices that comport with their nature. There's a reason why God cannot sin: it's because he cannot choose against this thrice holy nature. Likewise, there's a reason why fallen man cannot not sin...because he can only choose to do evil. No unregenerate man is good and no one does good!
A unregenerate person is dead to God dead and sinThen how come?
So many know about God, while they do not believe in Him?
"You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder."
James 2:19
You raise an interesting question: Is God free to do evil? Is God the Father able to change His will, is God the Son free to sin, and could God the Holy Spirit become demonic? Is it possible for God to be tricky?
If God cannot do what He has decreed to be evil, then He would not be as free as volitional humanity created in His image, and there would be no basis for praising His holiness. Just as God created physical laws such as gravity, so He created moral laws such as “love everyone” and determined a plan of salvation involving the atoning death of Messiah to win our redemption from hell. Thou shalt love (MT 22:37-40).
The Bible clearly teaches that God the Son is free to sin in HB 2:14-18 & 4:15), and Paul (in RM 9:16-21) upholds the freedom of God to love or hate as He chooses. The cliche “might makes right” is true; it is because God is almighty that only He can determine what is right ultimately. There is no super-divine authority that determines God; God is self-determined. The only basis humans have for evaluating whether God is just is understanding how God’s acts and judgments are consistent with the moral principles He has ordained for those created in His image (RM 3:22-26).
If God were ever to change His mind, it would mean that God is tricky and that morality is ultimately arbitrary. Thus, ultimate reality would indeed be a farce. This is why we should not take God and divine love for granted. Instead, we should be eternally grateful that God has decreed loving to be right, and He promises never to change (ML 3:6). Let us praise God in the spirit of Psalm 66:1: “Shout with joy to God, all the earth! Sing to the glory of his name; Offer him glory and praise!”
Yes, Ephesians 1:11 can be taken to mean that God chooses without the knowledge and consent of individuals. However, Romans 8:29 adds the idea that God knew who would receive Christ.He made it very clear. The passage does not speak to WHAT God foreknew -- but to WHOM (personal pronoun) God knew in eternity ("foreknew" since the Eternal One and eternity existed before temporal reality). You're reading the impersonal pronoun "what" into the passage. That kind of interpretation is called eisegesis because you're adding to the text what isn't there. If God wanted to say he knew WHAT then he could have said through Paul,
"For the faith and repentance that God foreknew in his chosen people..." But that isn't what the text says, is it?
In fact, the NIV renders v.29:
Rom 8:29
29 For those (i.e. people) God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.
NIV
And this doesn't change the sense of the passage one iota since people are in view here -- not things about people.
Also, the Gr. term "ginosko" which means "know" also denotes an intimate, personal knowledge of its object. For example, Joseph did not "know" (have intimate, personal, sexual knowledge of) Mary until after Jesus' birth:
Matt 1:25
25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.
KJV
Matt 1:25
25 and knew her not until she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Jesus.
Darby
Matt 1:25
25 and did not know her till she brought forth her son — the first-born, and he called his name Jesus.
YLT
Finally, your interpretation would flat out contradict Eph 1:11 since God's will is not contingent on the will of his moral agents.
You may have knowledge, but you lack spiritual discernment, and spiritual discernment is what matters.
I think your basic premise is faulty. Man is accountable because he sins. There is no requirement in scripture that says man must know he is sinning to be held accountable.
If you are stopped by a law enforcement professional and he or she gives you a citation for a law you are unfamiliar with, are you any less guilty. Nope. Similarity, if you transgress one of God's laws you are guilty whether you recognize the transgression or not.
What God does say is that man can know of the existence of God through creation, providence, and conscience. Nowhere does it say man has the ability to apply reason as a means of entering into an intimate knowledge of God. In fact the opposite is true. The world through wisdom knows not God...1 Corinthians 1:21. Further, entrance into a relationship with God in Christ comes as a matter of the revelation of God to an individual...Matthew 16:15-17. Keep reading and you find that this is how Jesus is building His church.
So far from being a charade, I'm attempting to show you what the scripture reveals about the fallen estate of man and its affect on mankind. This is in addition to all the verses I know @Magenta has shared with you concerning the impact of sin on the will of man.
So stop considering what you think must be true of God and allow what scripture actually reveals to shape your understanding.
[Pro 1:22 KJV]Duuuhhhh, right!
You don't need knowedge to have distherernment!
Here's your problem.
Proverbs 14:12There is a way that seems right to a man,But its end is the way of death.
That means?
You will be held captive to your own wrong way of thinking without God's knowledge to expose and check you!
Self-righteousness is always self-assured that his way is the correct way…
Because he just feels it must be so.
For after all? God feels the same way as you do on a matter.
Right?
Isaiah 55:8“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.
That means? You must get KNOWLEDGE!
Teaching from someone who has been tested, and proven, able to teach sound doctrine.
.............
Yes, Ephesians 1:11 can be taken to mean that God chooses without the knowledge and consent of individuals. However, Romans 8:29 adds the idea that God knew who would receive Christ.
The problem with the concept of election solely by God's choice is that it contradicts His word.
"The Lord is not slow in keeping His promise as some understand slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance." 2 Peter 3:9
"....who wants everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." 1 Timothy 2:4
God has never withdrawn His gift of free will from mankind. The opposite, man is entirely responsible for everything he says and does. Jesus told us to pray, "Your will be done, on earth as in heaven." Why? Because God's will is not done automatically.
That's why I believe unconditional election is wrong. Does it matter? No, as long as the gospel is preached. Hyper Calvinism says that there is no point in preaching the gospel as God is going to save His elect anyway. That is obviously false. But that is the logical conclusion of unconditional election.
You raise an interesting question: Is God free to do evil?
No, my premise is logical, whereas yours fails to explain how a soul who does not know he is sinning is sinning.
Regarding Scripture, Paul explains quite clearly in RM 7:7-13 and GL 3:19-25 that the law was given so that souls would know they were sinners. It is true that intentional ignorance of truth a person had the opportunity to learn/option of learning is blameworthy.
Man can know of the existence of God through creation and conscience, but nowhere does it say man will be condemned to hell even though he had no ability/opportunity to be saved. On the contrary, souls are without excuse because they had the option to seek God and LGW (RM 1:20).
The wisdom of the world Paul cited in 1CR 1:21 is contrasted with GW or the wisdom of God in 2:6-7, which is the mind of Christ (v.16), the incarnate Logos (JN 1:14), and Paul taught (in 1TM 2:3-4) that God wants every sinner to LGW and be saved or enter into a relationship with Him in Christ, just as Peter did in MT 16:15-17. Keep reading and you should learn this truth. So much for the "fallen estate of man. "Stop considering what you think must be true of God and allow what scripture actually reveals to shape your understanding."
Like? Is Donald Trump free to deny the truth for a nickle?
Evil is an absolutely putrid, cheap substitute, for what God knows Truth has in store.
Man sins because he is born with the same kind of flesh Adam fell into.
Now, if God's grace-power keeps the flesh in check while giving a man's soul FREEDOM to choose?
Then the depravity of man has been conquered!
That is what @Rufus just does not yet have the capacity to comprehend, because of all the brainwashing he
is wishing to perfect as to gain himself power in this world… All while being done in the name of righteousness.
Jesus put up with false teachers.
So did Paul.
So did John.
And, so did Peter....
False teachers will always oppose the Truth…
While desiring to receive approbation from their invisible influencers, to ironically please their own flesh.
Only Sound Bible doctrine can make us free when accepted and understood
In contrast, the false teachers equate freedom with thinking freely without integrity.
The Lord sees all.
[Pro 1:22 KJV]
How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?
[Pro 7:7 KJV]
And beheld among the simple ones, I discerned among the youths, a young man void of understanding,
[Pro 8:5 KJV]
O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart.
[Pro 14:15 KJV]
The simple believeth every word: but the prudent [man] looketh well to his going.
[Pro 14:18 KJV]
The simple inherit folly: but the prudent are crowned with knowledge.
[Pro 22:3 KJV]
A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.
Duuuhhhh, right!
You don't need knowedge to have distherernment!
Here's your problem.
Proverbs 14:12There is a way that seems right to a man,But its end is the way of death.
That means?
You will be held captive to your own wrong way of thinking without God's knowledge to expose and check you!
Self-righteousness is always self-assured that his way is the correct way…
Because he just feels it must be so.
For after all? God feels the same way as you do on a matter.
Right?
Isaiah 55:8“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.
That means? You must get KNOWLEDGE!
Teaching from someone who has been tested, and proven, able to teach sound doctrine.
.............
None of the passages you cited teach the peccability of Christ or God. Rather, scripture teaches the impeccability of both! God cannot lie! God cannot DENY himself, i.e. cannot deny who and what he is in his essence (nature). It's cold comfort to know that the triune God is capable of sinning. I thank God for his impeccability and immutability.
And, yes, Jesus was tempted from without -- but never from within! Conversely, man is neither impeccable or immutable. Far from it!
Here's a link if you're interested:
https://www.gotquestions.org/could-Jesus-have-sinned.html
And another reason the the triune God cannot sin is because God is FREE FROM all evil influences. This makes him FREE TO only do what is righteous, just, holy and good.
Tell me: Do you think the saints in our glorified state will be able sin?
I may not be perfect, but I am perfectly willing to devour 12 hours of fine Bible lectures non-stop.Physician, heal thyself first!
So the elect could perish? Makes no sense to me. Believe as you wish. I don't agree. That's fine.Yes, God knew who would receive Christ because he predestined them in eternity for salvation.
And you're taking 2Pet 3:9 and 1Tim 2:4 out of context. In the former passage, Peter is saying that God does not want any of his readers (the ELECT) to perish. (Pay careful attention to personal pronouns in that passage.) And in the latter passage, Paul is referring to the Gentiles.
I may not be perfect, but I am perfectly willing to devour 12 hours of fine Bible lectures non-stop.
And then listen to them all at least 2 or 3 (sometimes 5 or 6) times over again.
And that is just the cursory background info.
Then I undertake the other 80 or 120 hours of lectures to get a better grasp of the subject matter.
How about you?
And I see with all that that studying, hitting the books and all those PH.D. lecturers, you have learned to be proud, arrogant and boastful.
So the elect could perish? Makes no sense to me. Believe as you wish. I don't agree. That's fine.