Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,889
649
113
Well then...since you misunderstand the doctrine of election, stick around and pay close attention to those who do understand. Perhaps it would please God to open your mind and heart to the truth.
I think the problem, Rufus, is that they just can't bring themselves to accept that it is actually God who is the Savior and not man.
The fact that He refers to Himself throughout the Bible as the Savior(singular) is completely irrelevant to them.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,801
8,618
113
Best post yet @cv5 and misunderstanding, poorly defining God's sovereignty.
What the Calvinites cannot fathom is that God provided a certain degree of sovereignty to his creation as well.
You know.....like Adam. Who was gifted with the responsibility to oversee, manage and keep what God created.

Satan too. He definitely holds a certain degree of authority and sovereignty.

Cuz you know......God is big enough to allow for that.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,801
8,618
113
I think the problem, Rufus, is that they just can't bring themselves to accept that it is actually God who is the Savior and not man.
The fact that He refers to Himself throughout the Bible as the Savior(singular) is completely irrelevant to them.
Thank goodness the inquisition is no longer a problem today.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,889
649
113
Happy Birthday to all the Jarheads that may be out there and Semper Fi.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,059
415
83
God is not unrighteous, nor irrational.

Irresistible grace is both.
TULIP was not from Calvin, but came after his death from the likes of one of his disciples, Theodore Beza.
I have a question for you, Mr. Genez: When Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, do you believe that was a gracious act by the Savior? If not, why?
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,059
415
83
Oh no. I did not miss the cental point. Or any other point for that matter.
In fact, that was my emphasis, so I highlighted portions of the text IN BOLD for your approbation.

But I guess you missed the point in my doing so.
Yeah, you did miss the point entirely because the prodigal's "free" will is not the point to the parable. You made a huge deal of all the prodigal's "I wills' when the real point is that God welcomes, receives and delights in humble, repentant sinners -- a truth that the self-righteous religious elite of Jesus' day largely dismissed or at the very least discounted. Also, all your highlighting of the "I wills" and your interpretation of them contradict several scriptures that teach that repentance, like faith, is a gift of God as I pointed out earlier.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,801
8,618
113
Yeah, you did miss the point entirely because the prodigal's "free" will is not the point to the parable. You made a huge deal of all the prodigal's "I wills' when the real point is that God welcomes, receives and delights in humble, repentant sinners -- a truth that the self-righteous religious elite of Jesus' day largely dismissed or at the very least discounted. Also, all your highlighting of the "I wills" and your interpretation of them contradict several scriptures that teach that repentance, like faith, is a gift of God as I pointed out earlier.
Dodging shucking and jiving and bafflegab. Thats what I see.
Anybody else agree?
 

MeowFlower

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2024
883
406
63
youtube.com
What the Calvinites cannot fathom is that God provided a certain degree of sovereignty to his creation as well.
You know.....like Adam. Who was gifted with the responsibility to oversee, manage and keep what God created.

Satan too. He definitely holds a certain degree of authority and sovereignty.

Cuz you know......God is big enough to allow for that.
There is no degree to Sovereignty. As in,a certain degree of.

Satan has no degree of Sovereignty. He can only do what God permits because God alone has Dominion and is Sovereign.

The Calvanist bigotry blinds people to the truth.

Jesus said,no one can come to him unless....

And in context to that condition , God calls whom he will, his call is his choosing us. Just as Jesus told his Disciples they did not choose him,he chose them.

When Jesus said the natural (sinful,worldly) consciousness/mind cannot understand the things of God,as in the Gospel,because it is spiritually discerned that means we cannot choose Jesus because to our worldly mind the Gospel,the things of God,are thought to be foolishness to us.

When God tells us he wrote the names of those he redeemed through his grace before the creation, foundation,of the world,and the lamb that would take the sins of the world upon itself was also slain before the world was founded,created, predestination is Scripture.

When God tells us we do not save ourselves,we are saved by grace of God ,not of ourselves so we cannot boast, we cannot then insist we do choose Salvation and therein boast. Nor can we say we believe the scriptures when in insisting we choose to be saved we contradict them.

Calvinism is Reformed Theology that predates John Calvin. His TULIP is a culmination of everything Jesus taught as to why ,what,and how we are and need Saving.

Jesus predated John Calvin. Those who taught the same thing prior to Calvin garnered their teachings from Jesus teachings in scripture.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,059
415
83
I think the problem, Rufus, is that they just can't bring themselves to accept that it is actually God who is the Savior and not man.
The fact that He refers to Himself throughout the Bible as the Savior(singular) is completely irrelevant to them.
And the reason "they just cannot bring themselves to accept" the plain truth is due to their self-deceived hearts and their pride. Christianity aside, the rest of the religious world has deceived itself into believing they they can merit God's favor in one way or another.
It's no wonder that John wrote that the whole world is under the power (control) of the evil one (1Jn 5:19), and Paul taught that Satan has blinded the minds of unbelievers (including purveyors of false gospels) so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ who is the image of God (2Cor 4:4). These people don't understand that the gospel of forgiveness, the gospel of the kingdom, etc. is also the gospel of the grace of God (Act 20:24). Therefore, man cannot add anything to it, otherwise it ceases to be grace once it becomes polluted, corrupted and defiled with man's works -- works that are as dead as the world itself!
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,080
6,883
113
62
To ignore the first 2 parts of the parable allows for different understanding than the context of the parable allows.

The Shepherd clearly goes after the sheep. The Spirit enlightens and cleanses that the coin is found. Then...and only then is the wayward child received home and celebrated.

Father, Son, and Spirit are all involved in the salvation of the sinner.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,059
415
83
Dodging shucking and jiving and bafflegab. Thats what I see.
Anybody else agree?
If it'll make you feel any better just take a vote to gain the approval of men. You can learn much from the Pharisees in the NT. They were experts in backslapping and coveting the approval of men.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,450
539
113
When you don't know the meaning of Sovereignty and refuse to learn what it means,it is you who do not understand.
I do know the meaning of Sovereignty.

I also know the meaning of absolute Righteousness.

Know that God can not change.. He is immutable.

Know that God is love. There can be no love without free volition.

TULIP's version of God's sovereignty amounts to we being players in God's video game.

At the time it was a way to answer a question that mystified the ones asking.
Trouble is. Theodore Beza did just like the Catholic church was known for doing.
His sect made up it's own definition to explain something.
And, Calvinists accepted what was proclaimed as if it were ex cathedra..

The rigid mind set of TULIP exchanged places with the rigid mind set of the Vatican's.
They were used to going along with that kind of religious locked-in kind of thinking at that time.

Our way of knowing freedom in Christ was not known in the religious culture at that time.
It took many years of growing in the Word to eventually bring us to finally achieving a solid grasp
on the Freedom in the Spirit with Truth some know today.

God sovereignly had me proclaim that to you...
It was decreed that I would.

grace and peace ..............
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,450
539
113
I have a question for you, Mr. Genez: When Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, do you believe that was a gracious act by the Savior? If not, why?
Tell me...

How do you come up with such ______ ideas?

Do you know the difference between an 'ideal' solution?
And, an 'idealistic' solution?

They are not the same things!

God's grace, and God being gracious, are not the same thing.

.......
 

MeowFlower

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2024
883
406
63
youtube.com
I do know the meaning of Sovereignty.

I also know the meaning of absolute Righteousness.

Know that God can not change.. He is immutable.

Know that God is love. There can be no love without free volition.

TULIP's version of God's sovereignty amounts to we being players in God's video game.

At the time it was a way to answer a question that mystified the ones asking.
Trouble is. Theodore Beza did just like the Catholic church was known for doing.
His sect made up it's own definition to explain something.
And, Calvinists accepted what was proclaimed as if it were ex cathedra..

The rigid mind set of TULIP exchanged places with the rigid mind set of the Vatican's.
They were used to going along with that kind of religious locked-in kind of thinking at that time.

Our way of knowing freedom in Christ was not known in the religious culture at that time.
It took many years of growing in the Word to eventually bring us to finally achieving a solid grasp
on the Freedom in the Spirit with Truth some know today.

God sovereignly had me proclaim that to you...
It was decreed that I would.

grace and peace ..............
Sarcasm posing as self righteousness is a bad example.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,801
8,618
113
If it'll make you feel any better just take a vote to gain the approval of men. You can learn much from the Pharisees in the NT. They were experts in backslapping and coveting the approval of men.
On that theme, it is apparent to some (if not many) that the Calvinistas could be the Pharisees of today!
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,450
539
113
Sarcasm posing as self righteousness is a bad example.
You are saying that Paul was not righteous?

Paul's epistles in the Greek are loaded with sarcasm when it was needed....
Paul was filled with the Spirit while he wrote.

I did not sense any sarcasm in what I wrote.
That's between you and the Lord.
 

MeowFlower

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2024
883
406
63
youtube.com
You are saying that Paul was not righteous?
Nothing I stated would cause someone to infer I stated that.

Paul's epistles in the Greek are loaded with sarcasm when it was needed....
No,they aren't.
needed....
Paul was filled with the Spirit while he wrote.
He was indeed. It is wrong for you to compare your behavior to Paul's.

I did not sense any sarcasm in what I wrote.
That's between you and the Lord.
You wouldn't be conscious of your sin now would you? As Paul told us,that is the condition of the natural mind.