it would not?Your last statement is true. But apart from the intervention of God, all will choose death. If it were not so, salvation wouldn't be necessary to begin with.
This is a nonsensical statement.
it would not?Your last statement is true. But apart from the intervention of God, all will choose death. If it were not so, salvation wouldn't be necessary to begin with.
And it is not completed until the person says I do.Salvation is consummated in space and time. So while it was in one regard accomplished before the foundation of the world, it was not implemented or consummated before the world was formed.
Yet you said it was applied to Adam and Eve and that they were therefore saved.Salvation is consummated in space and time. So while it was in one regard accomplished before the
foundation of the world, it was not implemented or consummated before the world was formed.
Yes he does,God may not choose for us, but He definitely enables the choosing that takes place.
Adam was as free as you or I.How free was he? As a natural man, he certainly had a propensity to sin. Otherwise, he would not and could not have sinned.
And God already knew which way the chips would fall... Eve was deceived but Adam was disobedient without being deceived.
We are born in a state of grace.Grace is a state of being. Once God grants it, you have it and are in that state of being. It starts with that state of being called repentance. This leads you to the state of being called belief (faith), and then to the state of being called love for God first, and all others as we love ourselves. You can't refuse it, and once you have it, you want to keep it.
Thats right.And it is not completed until the person says I do.
Christ set us free. When did Christ set Adam free?Adam was as free as you or I.
He could have resisted and told Eve no. he could have fought for her instead of letting her sin..
Thats why the onus falls on Adam. Eve was deceived. Adam knew what he was doing..
I have not swamped the OP with a lot of Scripture quotations,
but hopefully you will recall the NT verses which confirm the following …
Man is doubly incapable of believing in Jesus and the Gospel
1 – Because of the disobedience (sin) of Adam and Eve,
all humans are born with an inherited sin nature,
and are bent on sinning instead of following God (Romans 3:9-18).
Having a saving faith is against their very nature!
2 - All unsaved humans are captive prisoners of Satan,
and are bent on doing whatever he wants them to do (2 Timothy 2:26).
Jesus came to set the captives of Satan free (Luke 4:18).
Having a saving faith is against our enemy’s plans for them,
which, of course, is spending eternity with Satan and his demons in hell.
If the God-worshipping Lydia (Acts 16:14) needs God to give her the necessary
faith to believe in Jesus and the Gospel, surely everyone does also!
Similarly, the “anyones” who believe in Jesus in verses such as John 3:16
are the ones whom God has given saving faith!
Those whom Father God gives to Jesus are guaranteed salvation
This is the most wishy washy and worthless doctrine. Because if you pull up all the verses that could be interpreted to mean someone lost their salvation the argument is simply "they were never saved to begin with". Why would Peter tell us to make our calling and election sure? Why would Paul tell us to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling? Are they really saying this to people who aren't actually saved?This is all about the unconditional security of the born-again believer.
Multitudes of NT verses are God’s promises of salvation given to His elect.
Surely, those of us who are born again should be continually praising God and
thanking Him for choosing us … and for the Holy Spirit sanctifying us unto holiness
… and for Jesus interceding for us before Father God in heaven.
which makes the point.This falls within His permissive will. If it were prescriptive, all would be saved.
Its notI don't have any problems reconciling the two. Each expresses an attribute of God and displays His glory. I just don't buy that casting someone into hell is a manifestation of love, so I don't believe God is manifesting love to all people at all times.
Did Noah seek out God? Abraham? Moses? Did Adam suggest to God that He should sacrifice an animal on his behalf or make a covering for him? Adam, in fact, did just the opposite. He provided his own covering and hid from God.it would not?
This is a nonsensical statement.
False. Post-fall Adam AND the Woman were UNDOUBTELY free moral agents.Man's will is now subject to his fallen nature and slave to sin. While man remains able to make choices, he is no longer a free moral agent, and remains under the influence of his corrupted nature until that nature is redeemed.
Father God elects (chooses) and calls whomever He wishes
Jesus says to the elect, “You did not choose Me, but I chose you ….” (John 16:15).
Surely, here is a strong hint that we should investigate this matter further.
Romans chapter 9 is the most famous proponent of God’s election …
“… that the purpose of election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls.
… So then, it is not of him who wills (to be elected, chosen, and called),
nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy.” (Romans 9:11-16)
God gives grace to whomever He chooses, but no one deserves grace (unmerited favor)!
God gives justice to whomever He chooses, and everyone deserves justice!
God wishes that all could be saved, but it is not possible because He insists on His justice.
“You love justice and hate evil.” (Hebrews 1”9)
God is not willing that any (of us) should perish, but that all (of us) should repent …
… the “us” referring to His elect, who are promised salvation.
Christians are called to confess and repent of their on-going sins,
and the blood of Jesus will cleanse them of all their unrighteousness (1 John 1:7-9).
Nope, despite what seems the best efforts of some to suggest otherwise.are you though?
Adam didn't seek out God after sin. He hid from God. That's an odd confession.False. Post-fall Adam AND the Woman were UNDOUBTELY free moral agents.
The proof is unequivocal and codified for all to see.....
There was ZERO intervention from God when our father and mother made the RIGHT DECISIONS after the fall.
OR the wrong decisions before the fall either!
Their free will reigned supreme in their predicament.
Not only that, Satan had free will to cause chaos in the garden.
And God had free will to do all that He did when He intervened.
All three parties demonstrate the free will principle.
Free will is the INITIAL CONDITION demonstrated in this drama.
"YES, Adam was free to disobey. And he did.....to save his beloved wife. And he ALSO was FREE to repent and confess....and he did.
Adam chose to sin (a wrong choice) of his own free will.....WHILE HE WAS SINLESS AND PERFECT in full fellowship with God.
And THEN, AFTER HE FELL Adam ***chose*** to do the RIGHT THING of his own free will.....by preventing Eve from eating from the tree of life, and refusing to eat from the tree of life himself (which was a devastating temptation under the circumstances! Adam by his own sheer will power refused). And the Adam did the RIGHT THING by testifying TRUTHFULLY (as did the Woman) at the trial of Satan."
Rev 20: 14 Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire.Viewing God as schizophrenic is NOT reconciling love and justness, but I also don't buy that God casts people into hell.
And this faith/grace principle has been operative......SINCE THE FALL OF ADAM. And to be clear: POST FALL ADAM.Yes, we were all captive to the world, but Jesus blood frees us from that captivity. His blood breaks every chain.