(Psalms 103:5) (Is The Earth is Not a Globe or is The Earth a Globe?)
- Thread starter Conformed
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The aeronaut can see for himself that Earth is a Plane. The appearance presented to him, even at the highest elevation he has ever attained, is that of a concave surface—this being exactly what is to be expected of a surface that is truly level, since it is the nature of level surfaces to appear to rise to a level with the eye of the observer. This is ocular demonstration and proof that Earth is not a globe.
-
1
- Show all
I don't think you clicked my link.
This is the flight map, and there are photos on the site of a plane at the pole.
it's easy for you to sit in a chair and claim it's all fake.
But here is a opportunity for you to go see for yourself.
All I was doing was showing that 5 seconds of googling disproves your claim that there are "no flights to the south pole ever" - that's misinformation.
This is the flight map, and there are photos on the site of a plane at the pole.
it's easy for you to sit in a chair and claim it's all fake.
But here is a opportunity for you to go see for yourself.
All I was doing was showing that 5 seconds of googling disproves your claim that there are "no flights to the south pole ever" - that's misinformation.
-
1
- Show all
The human eye is incapable of detecting the difference in ”level” of water over small distances (up to a few miles). You are making claims beyond your capacity to know.
When you feel curious, do some research on the towers of the Verrazano Narrows Bridge in New York. You might be surprised.
When you feel curious, do some research on the towers of the Verrazano Narrows Bridge in New York. You might be surprised.
-
1
- Show all
Okay, this is more useful. But you will note that my statement was that "the flights do not cross the actual "south pole" and most certainly don't take a short cut through Antarctica."
Your map from the tourist company doesn't show either of these things. And if you looked into it further, you'd find that even ball Earthers admit that the "ceremonial" south pole advertised on the map by the tourist company is not the "real" south pole. Why not put the ceremonial south pole at the real south pole, if the real south pole does indeed exist and can be so readily visited by tourists?
Your map from the tourist company doesn't show either of these things. And if you looked into it further, you'd find that even ball Earthers admit that the "ceremonial" south pole advertised on the map by the tourist company is not the "real" south pole. Why not put the ceremonial south pole at the real south pole, if the real south pole does indeed exist and can be so readily visited by tourists?
You think it makes us feel special to argue with stubborn people whose worldview is in conflict with basic science and yet who talk down to us as if we're the stupid ones?
You should get some better hobbies if so!
You should get some better hobbies if so!
-
1
- Show all
that's both false information and a false conclusion.
the earth is big, hence the local curvature small.
you don't need to include the curvature for relatively small scale construction - so your conclusion is false.
But for very large scale things like bridges across the Florida keys, you do. and for tall buildings the coriolis force ((which is directly calculated from the earth's rotation)) must be taken into account - so your statement is also false.
the earth is big, hence the local curvature small.
you don't need to include the curvature for relatively small scale construction - so your conclusion is false.
But for very large scale things like bridges across the Florida keys, you do. and for tall buildings the coriolis force ((which is directly calculated from the earth's rotation)) must be taken into account - so your statement is also false.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Okay, this is more useful. But you will note that my statement was that "the flights do not cross the actual "south pole" and most certainly don't take a short cut through Antarctica."
Your map from the tourist company doesn't show either of these things. And if you looked into it further, you'd find that even ball Earthers admit that the "ceremonial" south pole advertised on the map by the tourist company is not the "real" south pole. Why not put the ceremonial south pole at the real south pole, if the real south pole does indeed exist and can be so readily visited by tourists?
Your map from the tourist company doesn't show either of these things. And if you looked into it further, you'd find that even ball Earthers admit that the "ceremonial" south pole advertised on the map by the tourist company is not the "real" south pole. Why not put the ceremonial south pole at the real south pole, if the real south pole does indeed exist and can be so readily visited by tourists?
flights from San Francisco to Chicago don't cross Belize. So what
-
1
-
1
- Show all