This is what I wanted to know, what did she say.
She walked in during the worship of the Lord, I thought that was disrespectful, but was willing to overlook it.
However, her message to me is revolting and highly offensive.
1. We know this is because of the damage done when she kicked out two Christians from her rally on campus, two students at the university that had every right to be there and every right to say what they did. But she did not apologize nor did she try and explain her actions.
2. Instead she pretended to preach the gospel as though it was aligned with her political campaign. That was bad. But to be expected from her.
3. No, what I found highly offensive is that the pastor would invite her to speak from the platform at a church service. We aren't talking about her renting the auditorium at a different time. We are to do a test of anyone who speaks, do they believe that Jesus is Lord, that He is King, that He came in the flesh and accomplished redemption for us by his blood.
If she had started by saying "I believe Jesus Christ is Lord and King" and then explained that she overstepped in kicking those students out but felt she shouldn't turn her campaign rally into a Christian service since many of the supporters were not Christian, I would forgive and forget.
But she never addressed the issue, never proclaimed that Jesus is Lord and King and instead turned a supposed message from Luke into a stump speech for her campaign. I feel the pastor is the one who bears the most fault here.