neuter gender? LOL, you take one word and make it elite over the whole text. You make descriptive words and make them normative.
Why do you keep ignoring proper biblical interpretation? No, Paul did not say tongues are for the unbeliever.
1cor 14:2,4
2 For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries.
4 He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church.
20 Brethren, do not be children in understanding; however, in malice be babes, but in understanding be mature.
22 Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those
who believe.
A Sign to Unbelievers.
Why do you keep ignoring proper biblical interpretation? No, Paul did not say tongues are for the unbeliever.
1cor 14:2,4
2 For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries.
4 He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church.
20 Brethren, do not be children in understanding; however, in malice be babes, but in understanding be mature.
22 Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those
who believe.
A Sign to Unbelievers.
So be it. You have been informed.