I did not ask for a verse to contradict Scripture. Get honest. I did not even mention 1st John.That was most certainly what you wrote. I answered your question fairly. You just don't like the answer.
I did not ask for a verse to contradict Scripture. Get honest. I did not even mention 1st John.That was most certainly what you wrote. I answered your question fairly. You just don't like the answer.
Here is what you wrote:I did not ask for a verse to contradict Scripture. Get honest. I did not even mention 1st John.
I know what I said. I said nothing about first John which you claimed I did. Get honest.. there was other things said besides that.Here is what you wrote:
"Can you supply a verse that contradicts what was said?"
What am I missing?
Okay, but what was it that you wanted me to supply a scripture to contradict?I know what I said. I said nothing about first John which you claimed I did. Get honest.. there was other things said besides that.
You want me to "supply a verse that contradicts" 1st John 5:1???
Why would you want such a thing?
We as Christians are not to negate one scripture with another.
It is JBTN who is attempting to use 1st John 5:1 as a all-encompassing verse that would make Acts 2:38 and others null and void.
There is no need to contradict 1st John 5:1, the verse stands true unless you add a grammatical definitive to change its scope.
I don't believe it was a fair answer at all because you lied about what I said.Okay, but what was it that you wanted me to supply a scripture to contradict?
It was your question I supplied a fair answer.
It is you who is being vague.
Just restate your question and I will try to answer it.
What did I lie about???I don't believe it was a fair answer at all because you lied about what I said.
I did not mean underline that but I'm on my phone and sometimes it is difficult to push right icon. I'm also at work so I can't respond in a timely manner right now
You do not make any sense, You say she is vague, then you say you gave a fair answer.What did I lie about???
Stop being so vague.
Actually you did no such things as I showed above. she never mentioned 1st john.. yet you came back at her as if she did.. she continually asks you why you are mentioning 1 john. and you continually ignore her question.. so who is really slandering here?I gave you a fair and proper answer. You on the other hand have replied with slander.
She has multiple times..Tell me what I got wrong and I will respond.
Do you not see experiences relative to water and Spirit are recorded in all detailed conversion accounts?
(Acts 2:38-41, 8:12-18, 9:17-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-7, 22:16) Do you believe this is just a coincidence?
The following verse pertains to born again Christians: "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;" 1 Peter 2:9Oh, yes, yes, I do, yet there is in truth only one Lord, One Faith and one Baptism, the Baptism of Father, the Holy Spirit to teach us truth, at least me born new not seeing as did in first birth here on earth. God just loves you too. start with God between God and you as the premise just loving you, then one will begin to see reality as born new. no longer alive to first birth of flesh and blood, caught up in sins, trying to not sin, which not one other person but Son, Jesus can keep from you from sin, when anyone are alive in thier flesh and blood nature still
Born again is real as said in John 3 to Nicodemus as man makes it out to be this and or that.
Amazing
John the Baptist's Job was to Baptize Jesus into the ministry of the Levites. As the Levites, would not have ever done that. Yet John Wass a Levite, and it was proper for him to do as led to Dom by God Father of Son Jesus for us was it not?
Your decision, not mine thanks
What is so vague about explicitly articulating the fact that I made NO mention of the John verse?Stop being so vague.
Jesus makes a clear distinction between water and Spirit in the verse:.
The water Jesus spoke of in John 3:5 isn't for bathing, rather, it's for
drinking.
● John 4:14 . .Whoever drinks the water I give him will never thirst. Indeed,
the water I give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to
eternal life.
In other words: the water Jesus spoke of isn't in the ground, in the clouds,
nor in a river or a lake because it isn't natural H20, rather, it's supernatural.
_
I gave her a fair answer to her question.You do not make any sense, You say she is vague, then you say you gave a fair answer.
If she was so vague, how could you even answer the question at all unless you got more clarification?
The Spirit, the water and blood agree. Getting water baptized into Christ doesn't nullify faith in His blood, it confirms it. Nor does the belief that the Spirit washes us exempt us from the necessity of baptism. People are too hung up on what "saves" us. They seem to only be interested in how to acquire fire insurance. Instead of trying to find a foolproof plan, just simply obey the Word.
"This is he who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ; not by the water only but by the water and the blood. And the Spirit is the one who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree." 1 John 5:6-8
Not from what I sawI gave her a fair answer to her question.
I thought she was quite clear. she asked you why you would mention 1 john, when she spoke nothing of John. You still as of this time, have refused to answer that question.She responded with vagueness and slander:
But that is not what she wants you to supply a verse thjat says somethign else about."I don't believe it was a fair answer at all because you lied about what I said."
"I know what I said. I said nothing about first John which you claimed I did. Get honest.. there was other things said besides that."
"That is not what I said. I shall ignore the rest of your blather in that post."
This is Magenta's question:
"Can you supply a verse that contradicts what was said?"
This is what was said:
“Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the Father loves whoever has been born of him.”
1 John 5:1 ESV
https://bible.com/bible/59/1jn.5.1.ESV
When someone believes that Jesus is the Christ they have already been born again according to this verse.
This was my fair response:
"You want me to "supply a verse that contradicts" 1st John 5:1???
she did not ask you about a scriptureWhy would you want such a thing?
We as Christians are not to negate one scripture with another.
it does not make acts 2: 38 void. Now your interpretation of acts 2: 38 (which ius in error) would make 1 John 5 to be in error. you put them in contradiction to each other. and appose each other.It is JBTN who is attempting to use 1st John 5:1 as a all-encompassing verse that would make Acts 2:38 and others null and void.
I agree. But your interpretation of acts 2 contradicts 1 john 5.. why can't you see it? they both can;t be right.. In fact. this is how you should have answered her question. in your view. Acts 2: 38 contradicts "what was said"There is no need to contradict 1st John 5:1, the verse stands true unless you add a grammatical definitive to change its scope."
You misunderstood her. continue to misunderstand her. and then attack and falsly accuse herAgain, what is wrong with my answer?
It is I who is making the effort to properly respond to a question.
It is Magenta who simply issues vague responses pertaining to my answer.