Just reread your posts.You never consider a candidate's past when deciding how to vote?
Where?
Just reread your posts.You never consider a candidate's past when deciding how to vote?
Where?
That's not even the worst of it. what about the mutilation of children and teenagers to conform to the promotion of demonic transgenderism.
As to anyone claiming to be neutral today, that it a complete lie. Even you cannot be neutral given what has been done to America, and what is being done to the West. Conservatives from the West are flocking to Russia which upholds conservative values. Yes Putin is an evil man, but when Tucker Carlson visited Moscow, he was stunned to see how clean it was in comparison to American cities today.
I don't understand your point. Are you saying Americans should not have the freedom and liberty to live as they wish?If you agree to live in a society where everyone is free to do whatever they want without causing anarchy, then why are you even debating to begin with? Since nothing is going to happen to you physically?
That's between the employee and the employer. If the employer says employees have to refer to trans people by their preferred gender, then people who can't do that shouldn't work there.But if you live in a society where if you don't accept that a man in a dress is a woman and this results in you losing your job
Sorry, not following you.then the next reaction to this is Trump installing a Christian Theocracy where you will be required to have a mullet haircut and drive a Ford pickup truck.
So you can't show where I lied, but you still accuse me of it.Just reread your posts.
I don't understand your point. Are you saying Americans should not have the freedom and liberty to live as they wish?
That's between the employee and the employer. If the employer says employees have to refer to trans people by their preferred gender, then people who can't do that shouldn't work there.
That's the free market.
Sorry, not following you.
Famous Hundred Million Dollar Tofu Bridges in Mainland China1 Corinthians 6:1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?...9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Would you dare to have a thief rule over your bank account?
Hi kettle.So you can't show where I lied, but you still accuse me of it.
I pray God forgive you.
Could you restate your question please?Why are you arguing against Conservatives is everyone is free to live as they wish?
I certainly hope not.Then the free society will elect Trump
Could you restate your question please?
I certainly hope not.
If the federal government can prosecute people for living a lifestyle that you don't like, what makes you think that won't be turned on Christians later in the future? What happens when secularists gain power and decide to crack down on conservatives or Christians?
So you can't show where I lied, but you still accuse me of it.
I pray God forgive you.
Ok, thanks for the summary.Let’s summarize
- I suggested that in order to have a more normal dialogue towards the center of the scale then the left should admit that a man in a dress is not a woman.
- You then said that all Americans have freedom and liberty to live as they wish.
- Then i said that if everyone has freedom and liberty to live as they wish, then why are you even arguing against conservatives?
- You then said that the free-market determines what a private employer should do.
- I then said that the free-market might correct itself by electing Trump.
- You then said: I hope not. Because then the Christian theocracy will persecute people for many things including language usage while ignoring that the government on the left has set the standards in the market by their language usage to call a man in a dress .. a woman.
This is where we are.
Well, like I posted a few days ago, it seems one of the reasons some people identify with Trump is because like him, they too engage in personal attacks, name calling, and overall nastiness.I really do not understand these accusations on a message board, you are a liar, you are a hypocrite, you should apologize ... people can police themselves, if they do they do, if they don't that is there problem.
Ok, thanks for the summary.
Honestly, it's none of my business. If the neighbor down the street wants to believe they're the greatest basketball player in the world, how does that matter to me?do you think it's reasonable to say that a man in a dress is not a woman?
Yep, which means we can vote on values like freedom and liberty.You know since we're independents and we are able to see outside of team sports?
Honestly, it's none of my business. If the neighbor down the street wants to believe they're the greatest basketball player in the world, how does that matter to me?
Because it's not so simplistically black and white.If it's none of your business what people do, then why are you even arguing with conservatives about their beliefs in their business?
So then I can expect in the future, to never see you pointing out anyone's sins or flaws, right?
Because it's not so simplistically black and white.
Again you seem to be missing the point.Politicians aren't pastors. Just like sports figures aren't, or actors. You don't stop watching sports because of their lives. Or stop watching movies because of actors. But hey, listen, if you can find the perfect moral candidate to vote for, let me know. Let us know!! We'll all flock to the person you believe is perfect.
Registered Independent my whole life.You sure you're an independent?
If someone is trans, in the vast majority of cases it's none of my business because it doesn't affect me. Some conservative and liberal policies and proposals do affect me.You call a man in a dress a "vague" subject which falls under the category of personal freedoms but you find more nuance in conservatives?