Hi @Eli1
Is that what you think I'm saying in talking about your example? Yeah, I can see where you have difficulties in understanding. No, I was pointing out how Paul, as I've been saying, didn't go around condemning people for sin... unless they were a part of the fellowship. And in your example that's exactly what Paul didn't do. He did not condemn them for their sin. He merely said that their understanding was from ignorance and he was going to explain the gospel to them that they might be saved. Didn't say a word about how offending it is to God that they're bowing down before false gods. Never said a thing about any condemnation for some sin. Just explained that they were ignorant and told them the truth.
Are you now able to understand? I was using your example to show that you were wrong in your understanding of what this specific and particular example of his teaching was to be taken by us. It is not any justification that believers now 2,000 years later can go around condemning the lost for their sin. Sure, if you want to go around and tell someone that what they are doing is out of ignorance of not knowing the one true and living Savior, that's fine. Have at it.
Then teach them about Jesus, just as Paul did.
You really didn't get any of that?
God bless,
Ted
Is that what you think I'm saying in talking about your example? Yeah, I can see where you have difficulties in understanding. No, I was pointing out how Paul, as I've been saying, didn't go around condemning people for sin... unless they were a part of the fellowship. And in your example that's exactly what Paul didn't do. He did not condemn them for their sin. He merely said that their understanding was from ignorance and he was going to explain the gospel to them that they might be saved. Didn't say a word about how offending it is to God that they're bowing down before false gods. Never said a thing about any condemnation for some sin. Just explained that they were ignorant and told them the truth.
Are you now able to understand? I was using your example to show that you were wrong in your understanding of what this specific and particular example of his teaching was to be taken by us. It is not any justification that believers now 2,000 years later can go around condemning the lost for their sin. Sure, if you want to go around and tell someone that what they are doing is out of ignorance of not knowing the one true and living Savior, that's fine. Have at it.
Then teach them about Jesus, just as Paul did.
You really didn't get any of that?
God bless,
Ted
You want things spelled out when it suits you but you want them vague when it doesn't suit you, like talking to sinners with gentle truth.
This is why we have different denominations Ted because you read one page and reach one conclusion and i read the same page and reach a "slightly" different conclusion.
Somehow, you think that Paul didn't point out the Truth here and telling them that they were sinning. Paul's goal and God's goal was to discuss philosophy with the Greeks not to point out their sin in the brilliant manner that Paul did.
Okay, at this point we have reached a conclusion which takes us in different paths based on free-will, so you can go ahead and communicate to the LGBT brigade in a manner that you understand when they are trying to show their lifestyle anywhere in your face and try to force you how to speak while you try to find your words to communicate with them.
- 1
- Show all