the point is- we were told the vax was "safe and effective" and it was neither.
now, if we were told " the vax could help, but it may have some long term possible severe .side effects".. then that would be o k.
it is called " informed consent".
For many of us we were not allowed to give consent, so there was no "informed" and there was no "consent". So that was criminal.
I taught science and I knew that in all human history we never once stopped an epidemic with a vaccine. Yes, we eradicated some things with a vaccine, but an epidemic is the result of unclean practice. Could have to do with rats, or with sanitation, or perhaps swimming in infected swimming pools. But in every case the solution is to deal with the unclean practice.
For example, sneeze guards at the checkout was a good idea. Taking temperature at the door and only allowing those without a temperature in was a good idea. Social distancing of 3 feet was a good idea.
However, they forced masks on people that were unhealthy and had little if any positive effect. They mocked and ridiculed the use of HCQ and Ivermectin which are both proven safe and effective. They made the social distancing six feet rather than three feet and as a result shut down most small businesses while Costco, Walmart and the Casinos were able to stay open. It was proven that vitamin D deficiency made one at much greater risk but did you ever hear Fauci encourage people to get outside in the sun or to take vitamin D? Instead they mocked outdoor rallies as "super spreader events" when in reality they were anything but. They knew that the best vaccine is to have recovered from Covid and yet they didn't care, everyone was mandated to get the vaccine whether or not they had recovered from Covid.