Hi
@Cameron143
No we don't. We know that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court allowed ballots to be counted that were received after the election date, but were postmarked as having been in the mail prior to the election date. No problem there. If it was postmarked before the election date, then it was still a ballot that was made without any knowledge of who the winner might be. The same knowledge as each one of us have when we cast our ballot.
I used to be a landlord and I would always tell my tenants that if I received their mailed rent payment in an envelope that was postmarked before the due date of the rent, then I would consider that a timely rent payment. Similarly, if someone fills out a mail in ballot on the day of, or the day before, the election and got it to the post office in time for it to be postmarked at least by the day of the election, then that ballot is valid. And if the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania says that it is legal, then it isn't in any way a fraudulent ballot. It would be a perfectly legal ballot according to the election laws of the state of Pennsylvania. We should keep in mind that each state has the lawful duty to determine how the voting process works within their boundaries.
BTW do you know how many ballots were counted as such? How many ballots did the elections departments of Pennsylvania receive after the election date that were postmarked by the election date? That issue doesn't really have any bearing on the matter, but I'm just curious whether or not you've done the research to prove your point. And of course, another more important matter would be, how many of those late ballots were for the Democratic ticket and how many for the Republican ticket? You might actually find out that more Republican votes came in by mail after the election date but postmarked on or before it.