New Law: Digital Assets - Not Good 07/24/2024
I don't like it when Stan refers to "good guys" and "bad guys". I don't think that is fully accurate. It implies that there are those who will stop the mark of the beast from being implemented and that is completely false. No one is going to stop it. God has ordained it, written in His word.
So I want to explain it in greater detail, I think if we are naive and speak in these terms it sets up believers to look like stooges.
Think of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, which you could also call the tree of death. That is what the mark is. Their is just as much "good" as their is "evil".
For example: if you have complete control over what people can buy or sell it would give you the power to eliminate crime. What is the point of stealing something if you can't sell it and then use that money for something else? How do you hire someone to commit a crime? For example, how would you pay for drugs or for a prostitute? You could wipe out drug trafficking, and human trafficking. Also, how does a terrorist buy weapons? Theoretically you could eliminate 90% of crime immediately. Not all crime has a financial incentive or is facilitated with cash. But all organized crime is.
Not only so but you would be able to track every single person on the planet. So let's say some guy killed some person. You would be able to see when these two people were together. It would make it very easy to catch and convict people who committed crimes. So 90% of crime could simply dry up because there is no money and 90% of the remaining crime would be easy to solve and convict beyond a reasonable doubt. So not only could 99% of crime very quickly disappear, the cost to do this would be less than 10% of what we pay now. You would have very few if any cases go to court, public defenders could simply be AI, while about 80% of your lawyers could be AI as well. Arbitration could be done with AI as a judge. Since 90% of crime would simply dry up and disappear that means 90% of your prisons would be empty. You could close them down and cut down on the cost of incarceration by 90%.
This could also eliminate fraud. So you can forget tax fraud. Imagine how much money will be saved worldwide by eliminating all tax fraud. You save money on police, courts, prisons, and don't lose money to cheats and fraud.
That is the "good". But I use the term "could" because you have no idea if it will be "would". Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Whoever controls the Mark of the Beast could become the most corrupt and evil person on the planet. They could see people as beasts of burden that they have branded with their mark. You work as long as you are able and then they sell you to the glue factory. Yes, you have the power to eliminate crime, but you also have the power to rid yourself of all those you see as "useless". Imagine an accountant does a cost benefit analysis on each person and anyone whose costs exceed their benefit you target and remove. No one dare talk about this much less complain because the minute they do you cut their ability to buy or sell. The minute that happens they are a pariah, everyone else is afraid to even talk to them lest the same fate happen to them. If I can figure out who killed some guy in an alley at 3am, I can also figure out who talked to some reporter. Imagine how terrified any business owner would be of this, if they shut down his ability to buy and sell he is out of business instantly. He cannot think for himself, you can forget democracy, whoever controls the mark of the beast controls everyone.
It used to be we had 360 million Americans and you could feel a little anonymity. No more. Not with AI. We have all seen how our computers will hear something we said in our home and all of a sudden we are seeing ads for that thing we were just talking about. The benefit to the supreme dictator of cutting crime is that he can focus on thought crimes. Today we think of "agreeing or disagreeing" and "debates". You can forget that. This leader will be thinking in terms of "worship and those that don't worship him", there is no room for "debate" only "those that serve his interest and those that don't".