Obviously they are being dishonest because in their man centered view, the unrighteous require zero help from God. They are their own workmanship.You said above "I have a Jesus centered view" ...
Obviously they are being dishonest because in their man centered view, the unrighteous require zero help from God. They are their own workmanship.You said above "I have a Jesus centered view" ...
I am not misrepresenting the truth, I am denying what you promote. People can hear and respond affirmatively to the Gospel message because of the power of the truth and their own conscience.
They are not born unable to respond correctly, other things may interfere for some but not all.
Nowhere does scripture states people are BORN morally unable to respond positively to Truth, nor does it state each and every person who walked the earth considers the Gospel foolish unless the Holy Spirit changes their heart.
It is only to those being saved that the gospel is the power of God.
Acts 2:37 Now when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart,
Yes we would agree on that! Can you answer this question for me: The verse you have quoted in 1 Cor 1:30, and surrounding verses where these Corinthians are the chosen ones, the elect of God. 100% saved.In other words, cults like the Mormons "sincerely" seek after their gods -- but not the God who has revealed himself in his Word. Have you never heard the old adage that says, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions"?
When Paul in Rom 3 said that "No one seeks God", he didn't mean that the world at large didn't actively and sincerely seek after their versions of God -- and erect idols to them. To this day, the world is still quite religious.
While I believe much of this is very good, you have no explanation for how someone who is opposed to God suddenly is ready to hear from God. And this is the crux of the matter for me. How does a person go from Romans 3 to Acts 2:37? The idea that it is simply a change of the mind and doesn't incorporate the entire person being changed, in my understanding, is inconsistent with what is recorded in Acts 2:37.A few comments:
- Rom1:16 in looking at this with some more precision, IMO it simply tells us:
- The Good News from God:
- Is Power from God
- The purpose of this Good News from God / Power from God is Salvation
- (which is paralleled by Righteousness from God in 1:17)
- This Good News from God / Power from God for the purpose of Salvation is for the benefit of all (Jews & Greeks) who believe [it].
- IOW:
- It's really just a general statement of fact
- It benefits whoever believes it
- I normally don't do analogies but this is like a free-flowing pure water public drinking fountain that anybody can freely drink from. All they have to do is be thirsty and take a drink (John4 Jesus re: living water).
- It doesn't say how one comes to believe it.
- So we go to other Scriptures
- Acts2:37:
- Pierced to/stabbed in the heart is idiom we can all understand. It's emotional distress.
- All that's in this verse in context that stabbed them was what they heard from Peter as he explained the sign from God that the resurrected Jesus Christ now at the right of God had received the Holy Spirit from God and per prophecy was pouring the Spirit out on men.
- So, Peter is giving the Gospel of Jesus Christ and Jesus is with him pouring out the Spirit to substantiate what Peter is proclaiming as he draws from Scripture from God that his audience trusted.
- Anything other than this is imported / eisegeted unless proven by other Scripture.
- It seems God is doing an awful lot of work and having His proclaimer do an awful lot of work if all that had to be done by God is to give people a new heart or resurrect them or ??? so they could believe.
All this antagonism and disagreement seems to be centered around how an unbeliever believes:
- @Cameron143 and I think @Magenta say that God must circumcise the heart of the unbeliever so they can believe.
- @Rufus seems to think God must resurrect the dead/unbeliever so they can believe.
- I don't agree with either of the above and think the Word of God (Good News) and/namely the Spirit of God (which are paralleled in Prov1:23) can be received and believed by anyone ready to hear and learn from God.
- I'll let anyone else who cares to explain their own view do so and anyone can correct me where I'm wrong about their view.
- I'm happy to go through any Scripture one verse/small section at a time that anyone thinks substantiates their view.
that is an interesting point because we see the Holy Spirit being resisted, grieved, and quenched, and the Holy Spirit is GOD.
Yes we would agree on that! Can you answer this question for me: The verse you have quoted in 1 Cor 1:30, and surrounding verses where these Corinthians are the chosen ones, the elect of God. 100% saved.
Why does Paul say to these same Corinthians in 1 Cor 6:9-10 for example to not be deceived, that if they live like this they won't make it to the kingdom of God? Why warn people about things like that if its already done for them, they are already the elect, so there is no risk of them falling away. The warning passages arent something to be taken very seriously in calvinism as they would only apply to the false professing ones not the truly elect ones. Even though the letter is clearly written to the elect ones!
It always comes down to the fact that to some, the natural man is nowhere near as bad as what Scripture describes. The fact that the Bible describes the natural man as a slave to sin, taken captive to the devil's will, means nothing to them... that no man is righteous means nothing to them, that no bad tree can produce good fruit means nothing to them. Man of his own natural resources is capable of saving himself. No supernatural intervention is required. They might as well say Jesus was not needed after all because we can do it all by ourselves!While I believe much of this is very good, you have no explanation for how someone who is opposed to God suddenly is ready to hear from God. And this is the crux of the matter for me. How does a person go from Romans 3 to Acts 2:37? The idea that it is simply a change of the mind and doesn't incorporate the entire person being changed, in my understanding, is inconsistent with what is recorded in Acts 2:37.
Obviously they are being dishonest because in their man centered view, the unrighteous require zero help from God. They are their own workmanship.
Thank you! I will have to come back to this post later today because I'm at work and unable to look up passages and post at the same time on my phone... But I will say that even Jesus' will in His humanity did not always align with God's will yet He submitted to God's will in all things. These people who exalt the capabilities of the natural man then in essence make the natural man as great as Jesus... As if the natural man was not wretched pitiful poor blind and naked.Good way of putting it! And they are too proud to acknowledge that they were helpless, without power and in dire need of being rescued by God! PRIDE -- perhaps the deadliest sin of all (Prov 16:18). Augustine famously said:
It was Pride that turned angels into devils; it is Humility that makes men as angels.
And what is pride if not an excessive view or opinion of oneself by which a person has a grandiose belief in his own abilities (Jer 9:23-24) whereby the person places trust in himself instead of in God.
Now that I have you here for a moment....since you generally have sound spiritual insights, I'm wondering if you have ever come to terms with difficult passages like Prov 16:1, 9; 19:21; Job 23:13-14; Ps 110:3; Jer 10:23, etc. ? The common theme in these passages is the intersection where the sovereignty of God's will and man's meet. Have you ever given serious contemplation to these kinds of passages? And if so, would you mind sharing your insights? But if you haven't...don't feel badly about that either. These are not easy passages to reconcile.
I have some general ideas of my own but I would like to hear from you and even from others as to how they understand these passages.
It always comes down to the fact that to some, the natural man is nowhere near as bad as what Scripture describes. The fact that the Bible describes the natural man as a slave to sin, taken captive to the devil's will, means nothing to them... that no man is righteous means nothing to them, that no bad tree can produce good fruit means nothing to them. Man of his own natural resources is capable of saving himself. No supernatural intervention is required. They might as well say Jesus was not needed after all because we can do it all by ourselves!
While I believe much of this is very good, you have no explanation for how someone who is opposed to God suddenly is ready to hear from God. And this is the crux of the matter for me. How does a person go from Romans 3 to Acts 2:37? The idea that it is simply a change of the mind and doesn't incorporate the entire person being changed, in my understanding, is inconsistent with what is recorded in Acts 2:37.
It always comes down to the fact that to some, the natural man is nowhere near as bad as what Scripture describes. The fact that the Bible describes the natural man as a slave to sin, taken captive to the devil's will, means nothing to them... that no man is righteous means nothing to them, that no bad tree can produce good fruit means nothing to them. Man of his own natural resources is capable of saving himself. No supernatural intervention is required. They might as well say Jesus was not needed after all because we can do it all by ourselves!
Good way of putting it! And they are too proud to acknowledge that they were helpless, without power and in dire need of being rescued by God! PRIDE
Yes we would agree on that! Can you answer this question for me: The verse you have quoted in 1 Cor 1:30, and surrounding verses where these Corinthians are the chosen ones, the elect of God. 100% saved.
Why does Paul say to these same Corinthians in 1 Cor 6:9-10 for example to not be deceived, that if they live like this they won't make it to the kingdom of God? Why warn people about things like that if its already done for them, they are already the elect, so there is no risk of them falling away. The warning passages arent something to be taken very seriously in calvinism as they would only apply to the false professing ones not the truly elect ones. Even though the letter is clearly written to the elect ones!
Misunderstanding and misrepresentation.
What do you suppose happened to Adam and Eve when they sinned? How were they separated from God? Why did they hide? Why did they feel the need to cover themselves? What is the source of their shame and fear? Did they have these emotions before? What changed that they experienced them now? Did God change or did something in them change?Good observation and question. My statement purposely deserved this.
Firstly, and primarily, my simplest answer in overview without all the Scripture actually posted at this point (hopefully you'll recognize where I'm drawing from) is:
From there, I don't think God submits to the boxes men make for Him and He has many ways to accomplish His will:
- The Word of God and Spirit of God remain active in the world. Proclaimers are being sent and the Spirit is convicting/convincing. And since they are both inextricably interrelated, then they each and both have the power to do what they are doing. And the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. I think He laughs in derision against any man who thinks otherwise.
- Precisely how God gets through to men I have some thoughts on (see below) but I remain open to discussion from Scripture.
- Rom3 seems all inclusive but it is being written by someone who is not or no longer is included, and the Scriptures Paul draws from distinctly identify the fools/wicked who say there is no God while also identifying God's people, so not all are fools who say there is no God. I see no way of going down through history in the Bible and coming up with all men being the God rejecters Paul seems to speak of. Generally speaking, sure, but not in the absolute sense even though at times in history things were worse than at other times. Some men do not reject the knowledge of God that He has made clear in all men.
- Acts2:37 I think this is simply what it says it is and it's not the transition you may think it is if you see Rom3 differently than I just explained. Acts 2 is men who believed God existed and who were expecting Messiah and transitioned into belief that Jesus is Messiah based upon work the resurrected Messiah / the Spirit was doing among them along with some of their countrymen sent by God to proclaim the Gospel to them.
- The Gentiles:
- Men have consciences and that conscience is God created and God given and the work (singular) of God's law is done in men to varying degrees. Man's conscience can be extremely strong in some if not many. And orientation to conscience however strong or weak, if the standards are from God's standards, then the orientation is to righteousness and one of the things the Spirit is convicting of is righteousness which is correlated by Christ to belief in Hm.
- FWIW, I actually think this orientation is much more important Biblically than many seem to care to discuss.
- Life experience & desires coupled with an awareness of God's existence can and do combine and result in knowing there is something better for us, and coming to the point where we know it is not found in the things in this world. As some are discussing in this thread, many men are seeking meaning elsewhere. It's not a rare phenomenon.
- Along with man's conscience, his reasoning abilities though infected as his conscience is, are still functional to the degree God is perfectly and intimately aware of. The hardening of the heart is a process based in continuing rejection of God and I don't see it as automatic for all men. I've read from and spoken to men who through reasoning came to faith in Christ. Please notice I said "came to..." This is not meant to be isolated from my "Firstly" statement above. None of these points are to be isolated from what God is doing to make His Son clear to men.
- And so on... Always much to discuss.
I suppose the Reformed also misunderstand that when we were in Adam
What do you suppose happened to Adam and Eve when they sinned? How were they separated from God? Why did they hide? Why did they feel the need to cover themselves? What is the source of their shame and fear? Did they have these emotions before? What changed that they experienced them now? Did God change or did something in them change?
We obviously disagree on the severity of the effect sin had on mankind. I'm just trying to find out why. Thus, my questions.Are you disagreeing with something(s) I said, or seeking more information?