We disagree again, faith is being persuaded something is true and yes people have the moral capacity to be persuaded.
White is all colours combined... black is the absence of colour.Agree, "white" is a word we use to describe the absence of color, the absence of color is a real thing.
Here I think is the issueExcept for the fact that scripture makes "belief/trust" in Jesus and His work as a condition for receiving the gift of salvation.
I'll go with God's requirement.
I disagreeWe CERTAINLY do!
I tell the Lord I am honestly trying my best not to be combative, but this is a horrible definition of faith, and in effect makes human intellect, and ability to understand and be "persuaded" omit God from the equation.
I'm going to have to extricate myself from this discussion, as you are clearly not being persuaded on God's gifts to us. And I am astonished on your understanding of the Gospel.
I truly wish God's blessings on you.
Here I think is the issue
When you say bekief/faith is a requirment, it looks like your saying we must earn our salvation. But thats not the case.
It’s better to say God loved the whole world. That he sent his son to die for that world
That whoever recieves him in faith will never perish but has eternal life,
I can not earn salvation by believing “its the work of good we believe” - spoken by Jesus.
So I can not take credit. God gets all the credit
White is all colours combined... black is the absence of colour.
So acting responsible 'makes' us righteous?, or we act righteous because of Christ transforming us?Maybe because it removes responsibility of man and his ability to respond to the Truth of the Gospel message.
We can not even think of acting righteous (love) until we are first loved by GodSo acting responsible 'makes' us righteous?, or we act righteous because of Christ transforming us?
So acting responsible 'makes' us righteous?, or we act righteous because of Christ transforming us?
There is a righteousness before God (absolute) and only by the imputed righteousness of Christ through faith, and there is a righteousness before men (which is relative).We can not even think of acting righteous (love) until we are first loved by God
We love because he first loved us.
I always ask myself when i think of these discussions. Was the tax collector acting righteous when he fell to his knees and called out to God with faith of a mustard seed?
Or was he brought to the point of being poor in spirit (Literally Bankrupt) and in this state, Acted out of desperation. “Lord have mercy on me”
I would not call that an act of righteousness, Nor would I call this a good deed, nor would I call this the tax collector saving himself. I Definately would bot call this saving himself.
It was simply a rhetorical question.Is that what I wrote? Good twist and straw manning my words
Not inescapable but imperative.It is quite inescapable that people are called to believe throughout scripture.
It was simply a rhetorical question.
Not inescapable but imperative.
Let me ask again, "So acting responsible 'makes' us righteous?, or we act righteous because of Christ transforming us?"
We are considered legally righteous in the eyes of God. We aren't in practice righteous.I am sorry I do not know what you are asking.
Scripture is clear.. the call is to believe on Christ Jesus and his completed work on our behalf.
Upon trusting in, believing in Christ Jesus for the gift of salvation we are made righteous.
" ,, not by works of righteousness we have done, but according to His mercy, He saved us.."We are considered legally righteous in the eyes of God. We aren't in practice righteous.
I'm asking "Does acting responsible make us righteous" OR "Do we act righteous because Christ is actively working in us (sanctifying us)? It's really not a difficult question, more like Salvation 101.I am sorry I do not know what you are asking.
Scripture is clear.. the call is to believe on Christ Jesus and his completed work on our behalf.
Upon trusting in, believing in Christ Jesus for the gift of salvation we are made righteous.
Some have a name for that...Simultaneously justified and sinner...("Simul Justus et Peccator")We are considered legally righteous in the eyes of God. We aren't in practice righteous.
There is a righteousness before God (absolute) and only by the imputed righteousness of Christ through faith, and there is a righteousness before men (which is relative).
Maybe because it removes responsibility of man and his ability to respond to the Truth of the Gospel message.