Discussing the Free Will of man
First mentioned - Greek Haireō: to choose
Haireō: Defining it
Haireō: NC Scriptures:
Search of the New Covenant Scriptures (only NC for now) for Greek haireō and some observations about man’s ability to choose:
NKJ Phil. 1:22 But if I live on in the flesh, this will mean fruit from my labor; yet what I shall choose I cannot tell.
First mentioned - Greek Haireō: to choose
Haireō: Defining it
Haireō: NC Scriptures:
Search of the New Covenant Scriptures (only NC for now) for Greek haireō and some observations about man’s ability to choose:
NKJ Phil. 1:22 But if I live on in the flesh, this will mean fruit from my labor; yet what I shall choose I cannot tell.
- A little context:
- Phil. 1:21-25 NKJ 21 For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain. 22 But if I live on in the flesh, this will mean fruit from my labor; yet what I shall choose I cannot tell. 23 For I am hard pressed between the two, having a desire to depart and be with Christ, which is far better. 24 Nevertheless to remain in the flesh is more needful for you. 25 And being confident of this, I know that I shall remain and continue with you all for your progress and joy of faith,
- Some observations:
- Paul is speaking of making a choice:
- A choice between living here in flesh or dying and departing to be with Christ.
- He says he is hard-pressed between the 2 choices
- He says he has a desire to be with Christ and says it is far better than living here in flesh.
- He then decides that remaining here in flesh is more needful for his audience than is his personal desire to die and depart.
- He says he has been and is convinced and has known and knows that he will remain and continue with his audience for their progress and joy of the faith
- Paul is speaking of making a choice:
- A summary depiction:
- Have information > have choices > struggle of desire vs. need > convinced & know > choice
- Comments & Thoughts:
- The concept of Free Will is mostly a philosophical discussion spanning millennia.
- There's not much use discussing it if the ones having the discussion are not willing to define what they mean by Free Will
- There are some who simply say there is no such thing as Free Will but who will not define what they mean by it and depart the conversation.
- There are some who say there is no such thing as Free Will, do define it to some degree, then depart the conversation when disagreed with or questioned.
- It seems absurd to posit that men do not make choices.
- Does unregenerate man make the choice to accept or reject the Gospel of Jesus Christ?
- Some say, Yes. Some say, No.
- What I see in how Paul speaks above about choosing:
- It seems pretty simple and straight forward.
- It's a specific instance when he was struggling between 2 choices.
- It seems to match my experiential mental processes for as long as I can recall making choices - IOW nearly all my life.
- It doesn't tell us about a choice in accepting or rejecting the Gospel, but the process certainly seems to fit what some say is the process of coming to faith in Jesus Christ once one has heard the Gospel of Jesus Christ and this has information.
- It does show us Paul thinks it quite natural to discuss choosing in words and concepts easily recognizable and understandable to us.
- With the previously linked work defining haireō, we can see how this middle voice verb works in that Paul is choosing from some inclusion of self-interest, which in this case looks to be self-sacrifice as a son of God.
- Is Paul speaking of Free Will?
- Some will likely say, Yes.
- Some will likely say, No.
- Will anybody define their terminology and explain their answer?
Or could the will be something far more profound than that? God is a free moral agent, yet his will is severely restricted morally. How is this so, you might ask? Answer: I posit that God's will is perfectly free FROM evil, corruption and darkness since His nature is holy, righteous, good and light; therefore, His will is perfectly free TO always make moral choices that accord just as perfectly with his nature; and this is why he cannot lie, cannot deny himself, cannot be tempted, etc.
Sadly, the inverse is true of fallen man. While man is also a free moral agent, his will is imperfect in every respect since he is free FROM holiness, righteousness and goodness ; for man's nature is evil, profane and darkness itself; therefore, his will is free TO only make moral choices that accord with his evil nature, and this is the reason why man cannot not sin. He cannot not sin because his will is in bondage to his sin nature. For any free moral agent to be truly free in the biblical sense, he must be exactly like God, i.e. free FROM free Evil so that he is free to do Good always. Any man in Adam, therefore, is a type of God by contrast just as Adam himself is type of Christ by contrast.
My biblical proof for my premise is threefold. First, in eternity God's glorified saints will be totally free from the presence of sin from within and without, which will make all his saints perfectly free to love and obey and glorify God forever and ever. Yet, are we to suppose that we'll become something less than free moral agents, unlike our Creator and Redeemer? Will we become programmed robots because we've been set from evil and won't be able to sin?
Secondly, an important question must be asked about Truth: What did Jesus mean when he said, "...and the truth shall set you free" (Jn 8:32)? Free from and/or to do what?
Thirdly, a very similar question must be asked about what Jesus said about himself: "If the Son shall set you free, you shall be free indeed" (Jn 8:36). Again, the Son sets his disciples free from and/or to do what?
For me the answer is simple and as plain as day: The Truth and the Son (just like God and Moses with he ancient Hebrews in Egypt)
both set their people free FROM bondage so that they and we would be truly free TO worship God in Spirit and in Truth. We shouldn't forget that when the Hebrews were enslaved to Pharaoh for 400+ years they basically became just like the king's own people (seed): pagan idol worshipers.
In conclusion: TRUE spiritual/moral freedom or liberty consists of freedom from all evil, from within and without, which is the only way we can be free to always make holy, righteous and good choices in our thoughts, words and deeds. Anything less than what I have just said is not freedom in the biblical and spiritual sense. In fact, anything less amounts to bondage!
- 2
- 1
- 1
- Show all