Open Text > Insert Theology.
- We haven't even discussed the Text in context and your beginning is to insert the following presuppositions:
- the natural man is:
- Dead (without defining dead)
- God-hating
- Unable to understand [any] spiritual truth
- No Spirit = no spiritual discernment (though you've previously stated he does have some)
- The unregenerate first becomes a newborn babe in Christ, then:
- Believes the Gospel
- Repents
- Can do far more than the natural man can do,
What's the point of looking at the Scripture?
I'll do it anyway, once again:
1Cor2:14 is not about believing the basic concepts of the Gospel. Loose that premise and meditate on it. Just try it out.
- This is the primary difference between the different doctrinal views.
- #1 TULIP: Natural Man > Gospel proclaimed > Gospel not (can't be) heard >
- No Gospel belief
- No Gospel rejection
- No nothing - just dead
- #1 TULIP Solution: Infant in Christ > Gospel heard > Gospel believed > Infant in Christ
- No Gospel rejection (can't reject)
- #2 NON-TULIP: Natural Man > Gospel proclaimed > Gospel heard
- Gospel believed > Infant in Christ
- Gospel rejected > remain Natural Man
Simply put, this is an argument about TD and the definition of Spiritual Death
- IF 1Cor2:14 in context is not speaking about believing the basics of the Gospel, but about deeper things only mature believers can understand
- Then all it's saying is the natural man cannot understand these deeper things -
- It thus means we take the discussion of belief in the basics of the Gospel to other places in Scripture and part of TD is not found here.
I've shown you why I see "spiritual" in this part of Scripture to be more specialized than just meaning being in Christ - more than just being a believer. Here's more reason for this from this same document:
- NKJ 1Cor14:37-38 If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord. 38 But if anyone is ignorant, let him be ignorant.
- So, Paul is contrasting the spiritual Christian with the ignorant Christian.
- So Paul sees 2 types of Christians - spiritual and ignorant
- More in 1Cor re: ignorance:
- NKJ 1 Corinthians 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware ignorant (same word) that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea,
- Paul doesn't want Christians to be ignorant, so he teaches them (so they can become spiritual per 1Cor10:37-38, and so they can be mature and he can teach them the deep things of God per 1Cor2).
- NKJ 1 Corinthians 12:1 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I do not want you to be ignorant:
- Again, Paul doesn't want Christians to be ignorant, so he teaches them (so they can become spiritual per 1Cor10:37-38, and so they can be mature and he can teach them the deep things of God per 1Cor2).
So, with this in mind and with what I've said previously, I see the following:
- There is a difference in Paul between a spiritual Christian and an ignorant Christian - an ignorant Christian needs more teaching in order to become a spiritual Christian (shown above)
- There is a difference in Paul between a spiritual = mature Christian and a babe/infant in Christ (1Cor2-3)
Now, irrespective of what I posited before from Scripture, you assert your theological presuppositions again and add this:
So, you assert once again that believer = spiritual.
Not only does this ignore or simply disagree (apart from much if any explanation) with what I've previously posited from Scripture, but it also disagrees with what I just pointed out above re:
the difference between a spiritual and an ignorant Christian.
In Paul's thinking I see at least 2 types of Christians - believers with the Spirit - described 2 ways:
- spiritual and ignorant
- spiritual and infant
So, spiritual does not = believer.
So, looking at 1Cor3:1 again in this light: All you and I are doing is looking at the basic premise we have to see if it is presuppositional error or correct.
I already see you as being wrong as I just pointed out. But here we go once more. BTW, IMView this does not resolve
everything about the Natural Man and Spiritual Death, but maybe it's a decent start:
- NKJ 1 Corinthians 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual people but as to carnal, as to babes/infants in Christ.
- In context Paul says he is speaking to mature Christians about the wisdom [from God] re: this new era - the deep things of God - the things God has prepared for those who love Him, etc. per 1Cor2:6, et.al - things well beyond the basic Gospel
- Paul is speaking to Christians (brethren).
- Paul says he cannot speak to these Christian brethren as spiritual - but as fleshly / infants in Christ- So:
- Is Paul saying they are Christian brethren (spiritual) but he can't talk to them as Christian brethren (spiritual)?
- So he has to talk to them as infants in Christ?
- So infants in Christ are not Christians (spiritual)?
- Or is Paul saying he cannot speak to infant Christian brethren in Christ with the Spirit as mature Christians with the Spirit - i.e. as Spiritual Christians?
- Therefore:
- Paul has to speak to infant Christians with [spiritual] milk (1Cor3:2)
- Insert your 1Peter2:2-3 verses: 2 Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in/into your salvation (maturity - being Spiritual) 3 now that you have tasted that the Lord is good (they're in Christ and need milk).
- Peter: New born baby Christians need spiritual milk to grow by
- Paul: Infant Christians need [spiritual] milk to become mature/spiritual
- Different ways of saying the same thing.
- Milk explained: Insert NKJ Heb5 speaking to Christians re: [spiritual] milk:
- 12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food.
- The first principles of the oracles from God = milk
- 13 For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe/infant (same word Paul uses).
- Infant Christians need milk = The first principles of the oracles from God
- Infant Christians are unlearned/unskilled in the word of righteousness
- 14 But solid food belongs to those who are of full age/mature (same word Paul uses), that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
- So like Paul - the contrast between the infant and the mature Christians
- NKJ Hebrews 6:1-2 Therefore, leaving the discussion of the elementary principles of Christ, let us go on to perfection (maturity - same as in 5:14 and in Paul), not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, 2 of the doctrine of baptisms, of laying on of hands, of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
- Milk is further explains as the elementary principles of Christ - the foundation:
- Repentance from dead works
- Faith toward God
- Doctrine of baptisms
- Doctrine of laying on of hands
- Doctrine of Resurrection from the dead
- Doctrine of eternal judgment
cont'd