I'll have to research this practice a bit.... I know that there were "odd" beliefs here and there, but I've never heard of putting off baptism until just before death...
There is no shortage of man-made traditions in church history... my dad tells of how churches in the 1800's and early 1900's always covered the communion trays with a white cloth... it became standard. When some of the churches stopped covering the trays, people were outraged... that's unscriptural, the trays are supposed to be covered!
This tradition was simply started to keep flies out of the bread and wine/juice.... had nothing to do with anything scriptural, it was simply an answer to a problem.... but it became tradition/scriptural to do it...
There is no shortage of man-made traditions in church history... my dad tells of how churches in the 1800's and early 1900's always covered the communion trays with a white cloth... it became standard. When some of the churches stopped covering the trays, people were outraged... that's unscriptural, the trays are supposed to be covered!
This tradition was simply started to keep flies out of the bread and wine/juice.... had nothing to do with anything scriptural, it was simply an answer to a problem.... but it became tradition/scriptural to do it...
I'll have to research this practice a bit.... I know that there were "odd" beliefs here and there, but I've never heard of putting off baptism until just before death...
There is no shortage of man-made traditions in church history... my dad tells of how churches in the 1800's and early 1900's always covered the communion trays with a white cloth... it became standard. When some of the churches stopped covering the trays, people were outraged... that's unscriptural, the trays are supposed to be covered!
This tradition was simply started to keep flies out of the bread and wine/juice.... had nothing to do with anything scriptural, it was simply an answer to a problem.... but it became tradition/scriptural to do it...
There is no shortage of man-made traditions in church history... my dad tells of how churches in the 1800's and early 1900's always covered the communion trays with a white cloth... it became standard. When some of the churches stopped covering the trays, people were outraged... that's unscriptural, the trays are supposed to be covered!
This tradition was simply started to keep flies out of the bread and wine/juice.... had nothing to do with anything scriptural, it was simply an answer to a problem.... but it became tradition/scriptural to do it...
Genesis 15:6-7
And he believed in the LORD, and He accounted it to him for righteousness. Then He said to him,
"I am the LORD, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans, to give you this land to inherit it."
Abraham still has to inherit the land, but because he believed, the LORD accredited him with righteousness before telling him he must do this. and the Spirit speaking through Paul in Romans 4 calls this belief his salvation, long before even circumcision was given to him to do.therefore the mere fact God has things for Abraham yet to do cannot mean Abraham does not have salvation.
you were incorrect to say you have never read a scripture that teaches this: you have read these scriptures, but you haven't understood that this is what they say.
James even uses the scripture that you give as evidence that Abraham was justified by works. He quotes Romans 4 when he says that Abraham believed and it was accounted to him fior righteousness—exactly what Romans 4 says. So James was aware of what Romans 4 is talking about and yet, he STILL says that Abraham was JUSTIFIED BY WORKS. Now, I would be no better off than you if I say “works only.” Because that is not what God says. We are not saved by any one thing “ONLY.” Verse 22 in James 4 says that our “faith” and our “works” work “TOGETHER” to produce salvation. This is where you and I differ. And this is where you and the Bible differ. Because you insist on a “faith only” doctrine, you have neither God nor the Bible to support what you say.
Romans 4 must be interpreted and reconciled with James 2. They are both talking about the same thing.
Also, the kind of works that Abraham was not justified by were “boastful works” ; the same kind stated in Ephesians 2. There are also “WORKS OF GOD” as is evident from John 6:28-29 and those are the kind that justified Abraham. When God told him to offer His son, that was a work of God—not a work of which he could “boast.”. And God is careful to make that distinction. We are saved by the same kind of works; which is why He said we are NOT saved by faith only.