Nope, not at all honest. tsk tskWhat is that person saying they are choosing? Choosing themself of their own free will? or choosing Jesus of their own free will? You said they claim to choose themselves of thei own free will. Is your claim honest?.
Nope, not at all honest. tsk tskWhat is that person saying they are choosing? Choosing themself of their own free will? or choosing Jesus of their own free will? You said they claim to choose themselves of thei own free will. Is your claim honest?.
I completely understand what you are doing.
You cannot fool anyone here.
Jesus gave 2 back to back verses that showed the Will of the Father in John and you only posted 1.
I know you are here to deceive anyone you can.
I just thank God I am here to point it out.
Could you clarify this?Faith is a natural faculty all people possess. Otherwise you would never act expecting a particular outcome. Saving faith is that native faith directed toward a person or persons who can save.
40 For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.”
This shows our participation all day long!
We have to LOOK and BELIEVE!
Could you clarify this?
No. It isn't necessary for man to believe a lie. And I'm not talking about what man is able to accomplish given his use of his corrupted faculties. I have already assented that man has use of them. But they are not as they were before sin. How many times did Adam hide from God or cover himself before sin. Surely you can admit something was terribly different in man's responses to God after sin?Does God have to give a man the faith to believe a lie before he can believe that lie? Or are men presented with delusions upon which they believe with native faith?
Developing a bias toward lies does not mean a complete inability to receive any truth. You are assuming TOTAL depravity, which the Bible does not mention.No. It isn't necessary for man to believe a lie. And I'm not talking about what man is able to accomplish given his use of his corrupted faculties. I have already assented that man has use of them. But they are not as they were before sin. How many times did Adam hide from God or cover himself before sin. Surely you can admit something was terribly different in man's responses to God after sin?
It is this difference that must be repaired for man to respond to God as before. This reparation is the substance of salvation.
No. It isn't necessary for man to believe a lie. And I'm not talking about what man is able to accomplish given his use of his corrupted faculties. I have already assented that man has use of them. But they are not as they were before sin. How many times did Adam hide from God or cover himself before sin. Surely you can admit something was terribly different in man's responses to God after sin?
It is this difference that must be repaired for man to respond to God as before. This reparation is the substance of salvation.
John 6:39 talks about Jesus being given the planet and Him raising up a new planet at the last day.Ridiculous. You should have been able to relate 6:39 to 6:40 because 6:39 is the basis for 6:40 - they are not independent of each other. Your reply is not worth anything further from me.
Since it's a doctrinal belief you repeatedly put forward, you should be the one telling us, because as far as I'm concerned, it's nonsense, and I've been telling you that for weeks... and weeks. On the other hand if you have backed down from that unBiblical stance, good for you. But you get demerit points for pretending that it wasn't you in the first place.Now that doesn’t even make any sense. If God has chosen an individual, that person will, without a doubt, run into the arms of Jesus upon hearing the Gospel. Why? Do you not know? It’s written; have you read it?
You seem to have a lot of trouble understanding what folks write. I’m sorry for that, but it’s not my problem. You are going to have to dig in deeper into the Word and stop falsely accusing the brethren. I do reckon it’s time to dissolve our communications with each other. I hope you at least agree with my humble request, sister. God bless you. —SelahSince it's a doctrinal belief you repeatedly put forward, you should be the one telling us, because as far as I'm concerned, it's nonsense, and I've been telling you that for weeks... and weeks. On the other hand if you have back down from that unBiblical stance, good for you. But you get demerit points for pretending that it wasn't you in the first place.
So people can please God apart from faith? No they can't. Otherwise, why do the just walk by faith?You are falling for the negative inference fallacy again. Without faith it is impossible to please God, does not imply that all those who do not please God have no faith.
Without sight it is impossible to read this text, does not mean that all people who cannot read this text have no sight.
Thus, I do not see this strange doctrine of "God Programs human
'robots' to be saved." However, I do believe in His:
I'm saying what you call good, God calls evil. And I explained why.No. That's not what I said or believe. I said man does not become good by merely doing something good some time. An apple that is only 10% rotten is not good, even though parts of it are good. I said only God is good because everything He does is good all the time.
You argue as though something bad cannot contain any good, which is total depravity. But from the other side of your mouth you argue that man is not totally depraved, depending on which claim help your argument at the time.
I never said they were independent of one another anywhere. You literally made that up. Reminds me of your doctrinal beliefs. Made up without Biblical facts.Ridiculous. You should have been able to relate 6:39 to 6:40 because 6:39 is the basis for 6:40 - they are not independent of each other. Your reply is not worth anything further from me.
I cannot count the number of times you falsely accused me of not understanding what you put forward even as I asked you questions to help you clarify your position with the hope that you would finally get it right ... you made quite plain that anyone can choose of their own free will to believe in God and then they become one of the elect ... a whole thread was made on it. But if you stop talking to me then all your false accusations toward me will also stop so good for you. I will continue to call out your error.You seem to have a lot of trouble understanding what folks write. I’m sorry for that, but it’s not my problem. You are going to have to dig in deeper into the Word and stop falsely accusing the brethren. I do reckon it’s time to dissolve our communications with each other. I hope you at least agree with my humble request, sister. God bless you. —Selah
Thanks for clarification.PaulThomson said:
Faith is a natural faculty all people possess. Otherwise you would never act expecting a particular outcome. Saving faith is that native faith directed toward a person or persons who can save.
A gospel-ignorant child can go to a tap and turn it on expecting water to come out. They have faith that water will come out. An octogenarian atheist can do the same. They have faith. Every person has faith. But to start being saved from our guilt we must direct that faith toward Jesus as dying for sins and rising from the dead as Lord.
What is wrong @rogerg do you agree with what SS used to say??? That anyone of their own "free will" can choose to believe and then they become one of the elect?