The false teachers are not the Elect.
No, I don’t believe so. The them are the false proohets.
I certainly understand what you’re saying. …and I’m at a loss; I don’t understand it. Right now, I’m studying…
I know it’s kind of late to address this now but after looking at your reply, selahsays, I wanted to give you my perspective of 2 Peter 2:1, as I do not believe the one that you replied to was correct. That prior post took the position that the false teachers and prophets were of those bought by the Lord. And with that interpretation, I completely disagree. I hope the following might make visible a point of view which may not be immediately obvious in the verse.
Okay so this may be a little difficult to follow so please try to bear with me, because the verse is more subtle than it might initially seem to be on the surface, plus, I am not the best of writers. So, it may take multiple rereading to recognize it.
First, to establish a foundation, in 2 Pe 2:7 - 9, we are informed that those who have been ”bought” by the Lord, cannot “bring in damnable heresies even denying the Lord that bought them” because God will not permit them to do so. Once an elect became bought by the Lord, the Holy Spirit brings them, guides them, and keeps them, in righteousness. So, those bought cannot be the false teachers.
[2Pe 2:7-9 KJV]
7 And delivered just Lot
, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed [his] righteous soul from day to day with [their] unlawful deeds
9
The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and
to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:
Jude 1:4 describes the same type of situation as in 1 Pet 2:1, using almost the exact same wording. The verse informs that “certain men who “before of old were ordained to this condemnation” (similar to the false teachers and prophets of 2 Peter 2:1). It would be impossible logically therefore that both conditions be true at the same time: that from old, God ordained them to condemnation, and yet, they also had been bought by the Lord – one precludes and negates the other. Further, why would the Lord have bought them if He had already ordained them unto destruction or vice versa since the verse informs us that they were ordained to destruction from of old?
[Jde 1:4 KJV]
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares,
who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and
denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
In 2 Peter 2:1, the” denying the Lord” informs us of the message that the false teachers would teach; the "that bought them" those whom the false teachers would try to teach their message to; that is, through their teaching, the false teachers would try to deny the Lord unto those who were actually bought of the Lord. It does not mean that the false teachers were themselves bought of the Lord (Jde 1:4 also teaches against that possibly being correct).
If I may, just for clarity purposes, rephrase to better demonstrate my point:
This is what I believe the verse to state:
“ false teachers bring swift destruction upon themselves by the teaching of the heresy of the denial of the Lord unto those whom the Lord bought.”
This is what I believe the verse not to state:
“false teachers, those bought by the Lord, brought swift destruction upon themselves from the Lord by the teaching of the heresy of the denial of the Lord.”
In the first (above), the "bought" by the Lord, are those who would be taught by the false teachers (but who will never accept it nor suffer destruction); in the second, the bought are the false teachers who definitely will suffer destruction.
I hope I was able to make the distinction a little clearer so as to nullify the perception that Christ died for everyone.
2Pe 2:1 KJV]
1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there
shall be false teachers among
you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies
, even
denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
If you have difficulty in understanding it, please let me know and I'll try to clarify - as I said, I'm not the best of writers.