I don't what the Hebrew means for 'atone', but it has implication of correcting and remitting sin.I won't mention names but several claim no need to be forgiven if you've repented once because futures sins from now on are covered.
I don't what the Hebrew means for 'atone', but it has implication of correcting and remitting sin.I won't mention names but several claim no need to be forgiven if you've repented once because futures sins from now on are covered.
I only agree with the Bible. You should know that.I've seen you in several Topics and agree with many Reformed.
I don’t know. I let my Father judge such as that.You don't believe that has happened?
Who is saying that? From this forum?I won't mention names but several claim no need to be forgiven if you've repented once because futures sins from now on are covered.
You misunderstood his position. He wasn't saying he didn't need to confess, but that because he had already repented...turned from his sin and agreed with God that it was sin...that confession was sufficient, and didn't need to continually repent.I won't mention names but several claim no need to be forgiven if you've repented once because futures sins from now on are covered.
I do as well which is why I require deeper explanation of some posts to get at what they're really saying.I only agree with the Bible. You should know that.
It's why they were required a sin offering for every sin. That still means every sin requires forgiveness. But we do it by asking, not performing now.I don't what the Hebrew means for 'atone', but it has implication of correcting and remitting sin.
We were not talking repentance but continual sin.You misunderstood his position. He wasn't saying he didn't need to confess, but that because he had already repented...turned from his sin and agreed with God that it was sin...that confession was sufficient, and didn't need to continually repent.
You misunderstood his position. He wasn't saying he didn't need to confess, but that because he had already repented...turned from his sin and agreed with God that it was sin...that confession was sufficient, and didn't need to continually repent.
But what does the Bible say?One example was in the Charles Stanley thread where claims being made were if you do not ask forgiveness of sins you just lose gifts and rewards from God.
About sinning and sinning and sinning and not asking for forgiveness after being saved?But what does the Bible say?
Still applies.We were not talking repentance but continual sin.
So you are saying some of the Reformed on this Forum are not really saved even though they bash others for not being Reformed?Still applies.
And I realize there are zealots who would say we can continue in sin and still be saved. These people are not saved to begin with or will be the recipients of the chastening hand of God.
@Everlasting-Grace.To whose position are you referring?
He is not the only one.@Everlasting-Grace.
He does have a point. Repentance is a turning from sin. It is called for in salvation. Confession is for restoring fellowship with God.
I think that is likely the case, as a functional judgment. As a final judgment, I'm not qualified to make such a determination.So you are saying some of the Reformed on this Forum are not really saved even though they bash others for not being Reformed?
I will leave it at that. But they are giving Reformers a bad vibe.I think that is likely the case, as a functional judgment. As a final judgment, I'm not qualified to make such a determination.
They are not wholly wrong. Once someone is saved, there is no way to take such a one from the Father's or Jesus' hand.He is not the only one.
There were at least 3 others in the Thread I mentioned.
A couple also in this Thread:
Can the nonelect ever be born-again? (2 Kings 22:27) With the elect thou wilt be elect: and with the perverse thou wilt be perverted.
Jesus gave us a daily Prayer that includes daily forgiving others and ourselves. So there's some importance to obeying that Prayer.They are not wholly wrong. Once someone is saved, there is no way to take such a one from the Father's or Jesus' hand.
I believe the problem comes in when men believe someone to be saved when they are not, and when they inevitably fall away, it is assumed they lost their salvation.