Predestination is misunderstood...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
4,321
714
113
Are you saying Christ was wrong for stating this twice below?

Luk 13:3 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.
Luk 13:4 Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem?
Luk 13:5 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish."
Then you do not believe once you are saved that all sins are forgiven but that after being saved and you sin you must repent of those new sins?
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,230
2,207
113
So I brought up your interpretation that Adam was basically satan, and that satan didn't/doesn't exist as a being, but rather as something Adam and all of us struggle with internally last night.

One of the learned participants had heard of a similar doctrine from a group called "Christadelphians".

Do you consider yourself a Christadelphian?
^I'll research a bit into it and see if I line up with them anywhere else.

There is a Christian philosopher often quoted by a teacher (with a philosophical background) whose thoughts I often check in on at times that I find myself in want of encouragement. I think it might've been Kirkegaard, though that is not the only philosopher that he often quotes, maybe it was CS Lewis... anyway, it was something about the human's inate potential to be either a (paraphrasing) something (antithetical to glorious) horror or a beautiful something something better. I wish my retention of exact wording were so much more adequate, but I tend to think in abstracts. At any rate, I do believe this to of a truth.
I searched "Christadelphian" on wiki and ran into a contrary belief, in regard to the Trinity, in the first paragraph so I'm definitely not a Christadelphian.

And I found the actual quote I was thinking of which is, indeed, attributed to CS Lewis (not that I agree with him entirely either about everything). "There are no 'ordinary' people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilizations - these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub and exploit - immortal horrors or everlasting splendors" (The Weight of Glory).
 

sawdust

Active member
Feb 12, 2024
980
198
43
68
Australia
I don't disagree that God calls men to respond. We simply disagree on why people choose as they do, which means we disagree on the estate of unredeemed man.
I don't disagree with you on the state of unredeemed man apart from grace. We part ways when it comes to application of grace. You see grace can only be applied unto salvation. I see grace can be applied to free man's will from the bondage to his sin nature allowing him to respond to God in accordance with his true self ie. his self as it would have been if he had not been born spiritually dead with a sin nature.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,613
113
They responded differently.
Indeed they do. For example Ruth. Or the Queen of Sheba. Or Naaman.
What of Shechem? How about those Gibeonites?

Christ Himself spoke of a number of these.

You see, anyone of the nations roundabout Israel had the opportunity to enter into the covenant.
Anyone at any time. The "light was on", the spring of life was flowing, the door was always open.

But only some few did. The same goes for this Church age. The same goes for the Millennial age.

God does not predestinate anyone to the lake of fire. They go of their own accord.
Jesus Messiah, in His righteous judgement and justice, then SEPARATES the evil from the good. Forever.

And.....its over. Finally. Then comes the new heavens and new earth. The war has ended.

In this we can rejoice and this we anticipate while we abide as chaste virgins for our Husband.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,613
113
Are you saying Christ was wrong for stating this twice below?

Luk 13:3 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.
Luk 13:4 Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem?
Luk 13:5 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish."
Jesus is speaking about receiving Him. Then and there. Without delay. With the utmost urgency.

Jesus here is commanding everyone to take a bath in His Blood.
These passages have nothing to do with "washing your feet" after having "bathed".
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
it is only those who still serve the devil that have been handed over to believe his lie that faith is the cause of salvation and not grace.
no people who haven't come to the lord can be ruled by devil.

They hand themself's handed themselves over to the devil, which is why God enslaves people in captivity to his old covenant

Even if scripture says they have been handed over to the devil.

They where still being ruled by devil.

So what difference does it make.

As they where still born in a fallen state.

Able to be ruled by the devil.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,613
113
Act 7:51
You stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit; as your fathers did, so do you.
 

Chaps

Active member
Apr 3, 2024
307
114
43
California
You are guilty of the very thing you accuse me of. I never raised the issue that one side does not accept salvation by grace alone. You had to read that into my remarks.

One of the problems that invariably arises when the subject of salvation comes up is that people assume things of others. Another problem is found in the use of language. Often when a phrase or term is employed, it holds one understanding with one, and means something different to another. A third is that the subject of salvation is one that many become very emotional about and there are verses that seem to say opposing things on the subject.

But thanks for the discussion. Grace and peace.
I apologize if I misrepresented you. It was not my intent. However, you did say, “from that perspective, there is no need for God in salvation.” Maybe you didn’t mean it that way, but it seemed as if you were saying that my argument implied that God was not necessary for salvation. I don’t know how else to read that.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
From that perspective, there is no need for God in salvation. A person can simply read the Bible and believe and they are saved.

Except, that's not how scripture deals with salvation. Men in their natural estate never seek after God. It is always God who initiates with man.
This text does not say that man cannot seek God! He can and should seek God (Acts 17:26-27)!
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,075
6,882
113
62
I apologize if I misrepresented you. It was not my intent. However, you did say, “from that perspective, there is no need for God in salvation.” Maybe you didn’t mean it that way, but it seemed as if you were saying that my argument implied that God was not necessary for salvation. I don’t know how else to read that.
No apology ever necessary. I'm never offended by what someone posts. And I do believe the way you worded your argument it implies that someone could be saved apart from God. That doesn't mean I believe that you believe that is so. I was merely pointing out what I see as an inconsistentcy in your reasoning.
 

Chaps

Active member
Apr 3, 2024
307
114
43
California
Gnosticism is what this is, sorry but true.
I wouldn’t say the doctrine of Christian enlightenment is Gnosticism. Gnosticism was a dualistic religion that sought to meld Christian theology with Greek Platonic philosophy. It taught things like: the spirit is good, the flesh is bad (thus, people could practice hedonism as long as they had the correct knowledge (gnosis)). It also taught that God created the spiritual and a demigod created the physical world. And they taught that Jesus didn’t die to save us from our sin and rejected the resurrection (Why would God raise a corrupt flesh?). They believed Jesus came to bring knowledge and those who had that secret knowledge had special access to God/heaven.

Anyway, Christian enlightenment is a popular Christian doctrine. Although I don’t think it is supported biblically, I also don’t think it is heretical or to be considered false teaching, as would be Gnosticism. I just say this because I think we as Christians need to be cautious in our discussions and debates on the charge of teaching heresy. There is a lot of variety of views in the Christian faith and we need to be careful to distinquish between something that we dont feel is biblical and something that is heretical. The latter usually is an accusation that the person is not a Christian and their views lead people to destruction…which is why I think we need to be cautious about such claims.

I hope this doesn’t come off the wrong way. I just want Christians to be able to disagree passionately without claiming the other person is a heretic.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,075
6,882
113
62
This text does not say that man cannot seek God! He can and should seek God (Acts 17:26-27)!
Sure man is required to seek after God. And you are correct in that it doesn't say he cannot seek after God. It says he doesn't seek after God. And the reason is given...none are good.
Everything God created was good. After the fall, man is no longer good.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
I wouldn’t say the doctrine of Christian enlightenment is Gnosticism. Gnosticism was a dualistic religion that sought to meld Christian theology with Greek Platonic philosophy. It taught things like: the spirit is good, the flesh is bad (thus, people could practice hedonism as long as they had the correct knowledge (gnosis)). It also taught that God created the spiritual and a demigod created the physical world. And they taught that Jesus didn’t die to save us from our sin and rejected the resurrection (Why would God raise a corrupt flesh?). They believed Jesus came to bring knowledge and those who had that secret knowledge had special access to God/heaven.

Anyway, Christian enlightenment is a popular Christian doctrine. Although I don’t think it is supported biblically, I also don’t think it is heretical or to be considered false teaching, as would be Gnosticism. I just say this because I think we as Christians need to be cautious in our discussions and debates on the charge of teaching heresy. There is a lot of variety of views in the Christian faith and we need to be careful to distinquish between something that we dont feel is biblical and something that is heretical. The latter usually is an accusation that the person is not a Christian and their views lead people to destruction…which is why I think we need to be cautious about such claims.

I hope this doesn’t come off the wrong way. I just want Christians to be able to disagree passionately without claiming the other person is a heretic.
I do not think I mentioned heretic and yes there are elements of gnosticism in Christian theology and yes when there is a "special" enlightenment given to a person that is an element of gnosticism.

Of course a born again Christian can have elements of false doctrine and still be a believer. I know because I once was instructed in Augustine's doctrines, I was a believer with a bad teacher.

Thankful each day God did not leave me there, self imposed cognitive dissonance is a horrible burden to bear.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
Sure man is required to seek after God. And you are correct in that it doesn't say he cannot seek after God. It says he doesn't seek after God. And the reason is given...none are good.
Everything God created was good. After the fall, man is no longer good.
Yes man is no longer singularly good prior to the fall, he/she has the capacity for good and evil.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,075
6,882
113
62
Yes man is no longer singularly good prior to the fall, he/she has the capacity for good and evil.
That's not what it says either. It says man knows good and evil. It doesn't say he can do good. In fact, if you read Romans 7, Paul says the good he wanted to do he could not do.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
That's not what it says either. It says man knows good and evil. It doesn't say he can do good. In fact, if you read Romans 7, Paul says the good he wanted to do he could not do.
Alrighty then Mr. Cameron143, I was waiting for you to raise this objection! :)

Getting my ducks in order...

 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
Sure man is required to seek after God. And you are correct in that it doesn't say he cannot seek after God. It says he doesn't seek after God. And the reason is given...none are good.
Everything God created was good. After the fall, man is no longer good.
man still has the human nature that God created him with, before he fell. Which God saw that was Good after he created mans humans nature , and God also creates mans human nature to know right from wrong. And man still has that human nature after he fell

So total depravity doesn't exist.
 

stilllearning

Well-known member
Oct 4, 2021
598
307
63
man still has the human nature that God created him with, before he fell. Which God saw that was Good after he created mans humans nature , and God also creates mans human nature to know right from wrong. And man still has that human nature after he fell

So total depravity doesn't exist.
The argument against you would be.

John 3:.....19And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,075
6,882
113
62
man still has the human nature that God created him with, before he fell. Which God saw that was Good after he created mans humans nature , and God also creates mans human nature to know right from wrong. And man still has that human nature after he fell

So total depravity doesn't exist.
The image of God in man was corrupted in the fall. Salvation is about restoring the image of God in man...with some really cool upgrades.
You don't understand total depravity. It doesn't mean that man is completely corrupt. It means that every aspect of man...the whole of a person...has been corrupted. In other words, man's mind was affected in the fall. It still functions, but it is no longer as it was created. Man's heart has been corrupted. It, too, still functions, but not as intended in creation. And so forth.