The non-elect cannot be born again because they are the non-select and the non-select are not like the elect who are born again.
But the scripture states that the elect became the non-elect and the non-elect became the elect!The non-elect cannot be born again because they are the non-select and the non-select are not like the elect who are born again.
But the scripture states that the elect became the non-elect and the non-elect became the elect!
Do you deny that the Jews were the chosen people, the elect?That's referring to God's chosen people rejecting the Messiah and as a result the Lord turned them over to a reprobate mind and offered salvation to the gentiles.
Do you deny that the Jews were the chosen people, the elect?
Jesus was never sent to the Gentiles, the non-elect.
The Gentile dogs were grafted in at a latter date after the Jews rejected their messiah.
The word of God says while we were yet dead in our sins, Christ died for us. Yes, He died for those who are going to hell. Your intellectual understanding can not comprehend the love of GOD.You knew I was referring to the elect, are you suggesting that He also shed His blood for the condemned reprobate whom He's going to cast into the lake of fire.
Your philosophy is self-defeating; why would He shed His blood for someone whom He promised to cast into hell. It just doesn't make sense
The problem is you are trying to use human reasoning with that philosophy garbage. You think it's about me, LOL . its about the love of God that was given even to those who will go to hell.You knew I was referring to the elect, are you suggesting that He also shed His blood for the condemned reprobate whom He's going to cast into the lake of fire.
Your philosophy is self-defeating; why would He shed His blood for someone who He promised to cast into hell. It just doesn't make sense
But the scripture states that the elect became the non-elect and the non-elect became the elect!
First of all, you must identify who the "we" areThe word of God says while we were yet dead in our sins, Christ died for us. Yes, He died for those who are going to hell. Your intellectual understanding can not comprehend the love of GOD.
I looked long and hard to find any scriptures to support your private unbiblical view and I came up with a big fat ZERO.The problem is you are trying to use human reasoning with that philosophy garbage. You think it's about me, LOL . its about the love of God that was given even to those who will go to hell.![]()
First of all, you must identify who the "we" are
I looked long and hard to find any scriptures to support your private unbiblical view and I came up with a big fat ZERO.
So I suggest you go back to the drawing board, and come back when you find something to prop up your theory.
Your home work is to fill in the gaping holes in your statement "while we were yet dead in our sins". Who are the we, by your private interpretation Satan Himself could be included in the "we".
Those of us who know we are the "we" will reject any suggestion that that includes any of those people God hates. We know God hates many He confirms it many passages of scripture. They are thew reprobate, who can never be saved no matter what they do.
There is nothing in the Bible to suggest that God loves anyone who He's going to cast into hell. But there are many passages where God says He hates those who are going to hell. It absolutely absurd to suggest God could love someone He who is going to hell. It's crystal clear that He hates the vast majority of mankind. Very few will be saved, the rest are condemned to hell.
Your meek and mild Jesus doesn't exist, He's coming back to cast billions into hell. He is coming back as a man of war, He never came to bring peace into the world the first time. He came to turn son against father, daughter against mother etc.
You need to stop misrepresenting God as some soft meek and mild hippie. I find that quite disturbing
First of all, you must identify who the "we" are
I looked long and hard to find any scriptures to support your private unbiblical view and I came up with a big fat ZERO.
So I suggest you go back to the drawing board, and come back when you find something to prop up your theory.
Your home work is to fill in the gaping holes in your statement "while we were yet dead in our sins". Who are the we, by your private interpretation Satan Himself could be included in the "we".
Those of us who know we are the "we" will reject any suggestion that that includes any of those people God hates. We know God hates many He confirms it many passages of scripture. They are thew reprobate, who can never be saved no matter what they do.
There is nothing in the Bible to suggest that God loves anyone who He's going to cast into hell. But there are many passages where God says He hates those who are going to hell. It absolutely absurd to suggest God could love someone He who is going to hell. It's crystal clear that He hates the vast majority of mankind. Very few will be saved, the rest are condemned to hell.
Your meek and mild Jesus doesn't exist, He's coming back to cast billions into hell. He is coming back as a man of war, He never came to bring peace into the world the first time. He came to turn son against father, daughter against mother etc.
You need to stop misrepresenting God as some soft meek and mild hippie. I find that quite disturbing
First of all, you must identify who the "we" are
I looked long and hard to find any scriptures to support your private unbiblical view and I came up with a big fat ZERO.
So I suggest you go back to the drawing board, and come back when you find something to prop up your theory.
Your home work is to fill in the gaping holes in your statement "while we were yet dead in our sins". Who are the we, by your private interpretation Satan Himself could be included in the "we".
Those of us who know we are the "we" will reject any suggestion that that includes any of those people God hates. We know God hates many He confirms it many passages of scripture. They are thew reprobate, who can never be saved no matter what they do.
There is nothing in the Bible to suggest that God loves anyone who He's going to cast into hell. But there are many passages where God says He hates those who are going to hell. It absolutely absurd to suggest God could love someone He who is going to hell. It's crystal clear that He hates the vast majority of mankind. Very few will be saved, the rest are condemned to hell.
Your meek and mild Jesus doesn't exist, He's coming back to cast billions into hell. He is coming back as a man of war, He never came to bring peace into the world the first time. He came to turn son against father, daughter against mother etc.
You need to stop misrepresenting God as some soft meek and mild hippie. I find that quite disturbing
The perfect sacrifice Jesus offered up was for all mankind.You did not look at all. You did not address the point of "human reasoning. " Sarcasm is not a part of valid Hermeneutics.
John 3:16 Jesus was speaking Did not say God so loved the elect He Died for them. The Lord Jesus said those who believe and call on HIS name.
16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.
18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation,
that the light has come into the world,
and men loved darkness rather than light,
because their deeds were evil.
The Lord Jesus said, But you know better than he. What are you smoking, Hippie?
Wrong, God said He knew everyone before He created the world. So your theory that He only became aware of our existence while we were in the womb doesn't make any sense at all.FYI, we are those in the world whom God knows while we are still being formed in our mother's womb.
Or are suggesting God plan for those who are in the womb is hell? I am not misrepresenting anything. Also, name-calling in this setting just makes you a coward.
Why do you keep dogging the question. Who is the "we" in that verse. I didn't ask for your theory. I asked if your theory can be supported by scripture.You did not look at all. You did not address the point of "human reasoning. " Sarcasm is not a part of valid Hermeneutics.
John 3:16 Jesus was speaking Did not say God so loved the elect He Died for them. The Lord Jesus said those who believe and call on HIS name.
16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.
18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation,
that the light has come into the world,
and men loved darkness rather than light,
because their deeds were evil.
The Lord Jesus said, But you know better than he. What are you smoking, Hippie?
What I'm saying is that God has many attributes. He is a jealous God. He is a God who hates some people before they're even born. He is a God who Loves Himself, and He is a God who loves those in His Son. God hasn't revealed much about Himself, so He remains a mystery.1 John 4:8
The one who does not love does not know God, because God is love.
Are you saying that God is not love?
Yes, he said that, too, let's just leave it at that okWrong, God said He knew everyone before He created the world. So your theory that He only became aware of our existence while we were in the womb doesn't make any sense at all.
There's no need to resort to name calling, just present your case and lets see if your private opinion lines up with what god actually said
Why do you keep dogging the question. Who is the "we" in that verse. I didn't ask for your theory. I asked if your theory can be supported by scripture.

God said He knew everyone before He created the world.
What I'm saying is that God has many attributes. He is a jealous God. He is a God who hates some people before they're even born. He is a God who Loves Himself, and He is a God who loves those in His Son. God hasn't revealed much about Himself, so He remains a mystery.
We only know those things He revealed to us, He has hidden the rest from us.
It's extremely dangerous to add our view in order fill in those blanks which He has deliberately hidden from us.
God doesn't kill billions of men women and children and babies in the womb, because He loves them. It would utterly ridiculous to suggest that He does. My understanding is He does it because He hates them.
Your understanding of the revelation of the Christ is appalling.What I'm saying is that God has many attributes. He is a jealous God. He is a God who hates some people before they're even born. He is a God who Loves Himself, and He is a God who loves those in His Son. God hasn't revealed much about Himself, so He remains a mystery.
We only know those things He revealed to us, He has hidden the rest from us.
It's extremely dangerous to add our view in order fill in those blanks which He has deliberately hidden from us.
God doesn't kill billions of men women and children and babies in the womb, because He loves them. It would utterly ridiculous to suggest that He does. My understanding is He does it because He hates them.