They like to redefine words too, and then lie about it.remember, a lot of the judaizers do not take Paul's letters as Scripture, just inspired writings...
They like to redefine words too, and then lie about it.remember, a lot of the judaizers do not take Paul's letters as Scripture, just inspired writings...
Another of your lies. Wow! How disobedient, rebellious, and obstinate you are to continue so in your dishonesty.I'm taking the position that we should obey what He has commanded while you are taking the position of being disobedient and obstinate.
The position that some of God's laws are not moral laws is the position that we can be acting morally while disobeying those laws, however, there are no examples in the Bible where disobedience to any of God's laws is said to be moral and I do not see justification for thinking that it can ever be moral to disobey God. Morality is in regard to what we ought to do and we ought to obey God, so all of God's laws are inherently moral laws. Legislators give laws according to what they think ought to be done, so the position that some of God's laws are not moral laws is the position that God made a moral error about what ought to be done when He gave those laws, which is claiming to have greater moral knowledge than God.We are always to obey the moral laws, and laws of love, nothing wavering, for they are spiritual laws, and spiritual laws never pass away.
In Romans 6:14, it describes the law that we aren't under as being a law where sin had dominion over us, which does not describe the Law of God, but rather it is the law of sin where sin had dominion over us. In Romans 6:15, being under grace does not mean that we are permitted to sin, and in Romans 3:20, it is by the Mosaic Law that we have knowledge of what sin is, so we are still under the Mosaic Law, but are not under the law of sin.When the Bible says a Spirit led person is not under the law it means their sins are forgiven, and they are abstaining from sin, so the law cannot touch them for prosecution.
In Galatians 5:16-18, Paul spoke about the desires of the flesh as causing us not to do the good that we want to do, which again how he described his struggle with the law of sin in Romans 7. The Spirit is God, so it wouldn't make sense to think interpret that as saying that we aren't under the Law of God when we are led by the Spirit, especially when the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey the Law of God (Ezekiel 36:26-27).If we are led of the Spirit and we sin we are back under the law until it is forgiven.
In Colossians 2:14, it says nothing to distinguish between physical or spiritual ordinances.Jesus took the physical ordinances of Israel out of the way nailing them to His cross for they were contrary to us for they had no bearing on salvation which let no person judge you in the physical ordinances.
Correctly understanding a spiritual principle will lead us to take physical actions that are examples of that principle in accordance with what God's law instructs. If someone thought that they understood the spiritual principle of love, so they did not need to take physical actions to express love for their neighbor, then they would be missing the whole point.So we do not have to obey the physical laws of Israel, but we always have to obey the spiritual laws of Israel, moral laws, laws of love.
The Torah is truth (Psalms 119:142), Jesus is the embodiment of that truth (John 14:6), and with all of the false accusations that you are spewing out, you are clearly opposed to truth.Another of your lies. Wow! How disobedient, rebellious, and obstinate you are to continue so in your dishonesty.
How pathetically sad that you think you uphold the law while repeatedly bearing false witness.
In Romans 10:4, the Greek word "telos" can mean "end', though it can also mean "purpose" or "goal", such as with how it clearly has that meaning in 1 Timothy 1:5, Romans 6:21-22, or James 5:11, so this is a classic example where those who are determined to turn God's word against itself and be workers of lawlessness have the freedom to do that while a correct examination of the passage in context supports obedience to God's word.What about Romans 10:4??? "For Christ is the end of the law, with the result that there is righteousness for everyone who believes."
I feel sorry for you! You have missed the basic truth of Christianity. Read this verse carefully and pay attention to exactly what it says...
So, my brothers and sisters, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, so that you could be joined to another, to the one who was raised from the dead, to bear fruit to God.
Us embodying God's word through following the example of the one who is the embodiment of God's word is the way to be joined with him while rebelling against God's word is the way to reject God's word made flesh. It should not make sense to you to interpret Romans 7:4 as saying that we need to die to God's word in order to become joined with God's word made flesh or that we need to die to God's instructions for how to bear fruit for him in order to bear fruit for him, rather we need to die to a law that was hindering us from bearing fruit for Him in order to bear fruit for Him, namely the law of sin.Romans 7:4
Give it up Soyeong!!! You are wrong about the law and Christians.
All throughout the Bible, God wanted His people to repent and to return to obedience to His law, and even Christ began his ministry with that Gospel message, so why does it make sense to you to think that doing that is the way to incur God's wrath while rebelling against His commands is the way to avoid God's wrath?WRONG!!! Why can't you understand the basis of Christianity??? Why not just become a Jew and get it over with? Put yourself under the law and incur God's wrath. Let me know how it goes!
In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself to free us from God's law, but in order to free us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to God's law is the way to believe in what Jesus accomplished through the cross (Acts 21:20) while returning to the lawlessness that he gave himself to redeem us from is the way to reject what he accomplished.Why don't you obey His instructions by accepting Christ's sacrifice which put an end to the OT law???
I'm not denying the salvation that is found only in Christ, but rather I am promoting it while you are the one denying it. Our salvation is from sin (Matthew 1:21) and it is by the Mosaic Law that we have knowledge of what sin is (Romans 3:20), so living in obedience to it through faith in Christ is the way that he saves us from not living in obedience to it.Why are you denying the salvation that is found only in Christ???
What have I said that opposes truth in exposing the multitude of your lies?The Torah is truth (Psalms 119:142), Jesus is the embodiment of that truth (John 14:6), and with all of the false accusations that you are spewing out, you are clearly opposed to truth.
“I hate, I despise your feasts! I cannot stand the stench of your solemn assemblies. Even though you offer Me burntAll of God's laws are either in regard to the way to love God or the way to love our neighbor,
You want to sit as a judge and umpire on another man's salvation-go right ahead-I'd rather work out my own salvation with fear and trembling-You did not answer my question. I wonder if you assumed I was one of those two people. Whoa. How dare you.
Another question for you: do you disagree with Paul? Was he wrong to speak against Judaizers?
I wouldn't think so--The only “gospel” you’re spreading is false, unfortunately.
I agree with those verses. The fact that we are not required to earn our righteousness as the result of obeying God does not men that we are not obligated to obey God. There is a difference between the way to attain a character trait and what it means for us to attain a character trait. The only way to attain a character trait is through faith that we ought to be doers of that trait apart from being required to have first done a certain amount of works that express that trait in order to earn it as the result and what it means for us to attain a character trait is for us to become a doer of that trait. For example, there is no amount of courageous works that we are required to have done first in order to earn courageousness as the result, but rather the only way to become courageous is through faith that we ought to be doers of courageous works and what it means for us to become courageous is to become a doer a courageous works. The same goes for righteousness. We are become righteous by faith apart from being required to have first done a certain amount of righteous works, but becoming righteous means that we are becoming a doer of righteous works, which is why the faith by which we are declared righteous does not abolish our need to be doers of righteous works in obedience to God's law, but rather our faith uphold it (Romans 3:28-31). To say that God is righteous is to say that He is a doer of righteous works and it would be contradictory to say that God is righteous if he were not a doer of righteous works. In 1 John 3:7, everyone who is a doer of righteous works is righteous even as they are righteous.Romans 3:19-24 makes everything clear. I suggest that you read it!!!
"Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world may be held accountable to God. For no one is declared righteous before him by the works of the law, for through the law comes the knowledge of sin. But now apart from the law the righteousness of God (although it is attested by the law and the prophets) has been disclosed— namely, the righteousness of God through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ[aa] for all who believe. For there is no distinction, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. But they are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus."
How can you not understand this??? APART FROM THE LAW!!!
Why is that?remember, a lot of the judaizers do not take Paul's letters as Scripture, just inspired writings...
Agreed. Notice however the distinction between the gospel as cited in your examples ("The Law says you're a sinner so you need Jesus") and the false gospel that Soyeong preaches ("Now that you've come to Jesus, you need to follow the whole Law").I wouldn't think so--
THE LAW AND EVANGELISM
Similarly, the importance of the law is seen in a subject that is dear to the heart of every true preacher and every true Christian–evangelism.
In days gone by, children learned the commandments before they learned John 3:16, because only then did John 3:16 make any sense. Likewise, John Elliot’s first translation work among the Indians was not of John 3:16 but of the Ten Commandments, and his first sermon was on the commandments. Did John Elliot think the Indians would be saved by the Ten Commandments? Of course not, but the commandments would show them why they needed to be saved–they were law-breakers, and they needed a law-keeper to be their substitute.
John Paton, a great Presbyterian missionary to the New Hebrides, first taught the commandments. Why? People will never be properly interested in a relationship with the Redeemer until they see the terrible breach in their relationship to the Creator. The commandments are the moral mandate of the Creator to creatures. The sharp needle of the law makes way for the scarlet thread of the gospel. The law is indispensable in biblical, God-centered evangelism.
Run and work the law commands
But gives me neither feet nor hands.
A sweeter sound the gospel brings;
It bids me fly and gives me wings.
SUMMARY
The whole Bible is law and gospel, and the two are so vitally related to each other that an accurate knowledge of either cannot be obtained without the other.
The law reveals the character of God and the condition of man. These two kinds of knowledge are absolutely necessary for salvation. (See, for example, the first chapter in Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion.)
The law is essential to true biblical evangelism because by the law is the knowledge of sin. It was the law that was effective in Paul’s conversion: “I would not have known sin except through the law” (Rom. 7:7).
The law is the only biblical rule and direction for obedience–that is, a sanctified life. In what does sanctified behavior consist? Doing the will of God. What is the will of God in respect to morality? The moral law summarized in the Ten Commandments.
The law is one of three truths of the Bible that stand or fall together: (1) the law of God, (2) the cross of Christ, (3) the righteous judgment of almighty God.
First, if there is no law there is no sin because sin is the transgression of the law (The Ten Commandments).
Second, if there is no cross there is no hope for poor sinners–no forgiveness of sin.
Third, if there is no righteous judgment of almighty God who cares about sin or a Savior. These three truths stand or fall together.
The following statement by J. Gresham Machen, the principal founder of Westminster Theological Seminary will emphasize the importance of the place of the law.
A new and more powerful proclamation of that law is perhaps the most pressing need of the hour; men would have little difficulty with the gospel if they had only learned the lesson of the law. So it always is: a low view of law always brings legalism in religion; a high view of law makes a man a seeker after grace/ Pray God that the high view may again prevail. (What is Faith?, [Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust], pp. 141-142).
Preacher, preach the moral law; and parents, teach your children the Ten Commandments.
If the Law is "not too difficult for us to obey", why did God provide instructions for remedy after failure to obey?God's law came with instructions for what to His children sinned, so it never required us to have perfect obedience.
The truth is that God's law is not too difficult for us to obey
Since you preach that Christians must follow the Law, you must either preach that Gentile Christians must be circumcised, or you are not preaching the Law. You are either a Judaizer or a hypocrite.Christ spent his ministry teaching teaching his followers to obey the Mosaic Law by word and by example, so the problem that Paul had with the Judaizers was not that they were teaching Gentiles how to follow Christ, but that they were wanting to require Gentiles to become circumcised in order to become saved, so I completely agree with Paul’s stance against the Judaizers.
In Deuteronomy 30:11-20, it is presented as a possibility and as a choice, not as the need for perfect obedience. Repentance doesn’t change the fact that we have not had perfect obedience, so if we needed to have perfect obedience for some strange reason, then repentance wouldn’t do us any good, but the fact that we can repent after we have not had perfect obedience and still be saved demonstrates that perfect obedience is not a requirement for salvation. Even if someone managed to have perfect obedience, then they still wouldn’t earn their salvation as a wage (Romans 4:1-5), so that is a fundamental misunderstanding of the goal of why we should obey God’s law. Our salvation is from sin (Matthew 1:21) and sin is the transgression of of God’s law (1 John 3:4), so having the experience of living in obedience to God’s law is intrinsically part of what God’s gift of salvation is, not something that we are required to have done first in order to earn it as a wage. In 1 John 3:4-10, those who do not practice righteousness in obedience to God’s law are not born again, and in Romans 8:4-14, Paul contrasted those who are born of the Spirit with those who have minds set on the flesh who are enemies of God who refuse to submit to His law, so obeying God’s law through faith is the way to get born again and repent of our sin and to follow the Lord Jesus Christ.If you fail to keep just one commandment under the OT law, you are guilty of sin and will spend eternity in hell.
Since you have already failed to be literally perfect, you're pretty screwed at this point unless you get born again and repent of your sin and follow the Lord Jesus Christ rather than trying to earn your salvation by keeping the law.
Yes... but what is the end result of sin? Death. Our salvation in Christ is ultimately from the wages of sin. If all that salvation does is keep us from sinning (quite so much) in this life, one would rightly question its value.Our salvation is from sin (Matthew 1:21)
No. The experience of living in right relationship with God is part of the gift of salvation. The relationship is based on love, not law.so having the experience of living in obedience to God’s law is intrinsically part of what God’s gift of salvation is
No! There is no such thing as "obeying the law through faith". You either actually obey the whole law, or you actually fail to obey the law.so obeying God’s law through faith is the way to get born again and repent of our sin and to follow the Lord Jesus Christ.
How do you guys keep on and on? We could argue this for days on end, and our friends and family will still be in the same situation. This arguing accomplishes nothing. So you win the stupid intellectual argument. Big deal. You’ve absolutely no impact on anything. What has it changed? But go ahead. Y’all just hammer it out.
In Romans 10:5-8, it references Deuteronomy 30:11-16 as the word of faith that we proclaim in regard to saying that the Mosaic Law is not too difficult for us to obey and that obedience to it brings life, so believing that we can obey the Torah is a matter of putting our faith in God's word, but that is the word of faith that you are denying.
Furthermore, the issue of whether followers of God should follow what God has commanded in accordance with the example that Christ set for us to follow is independent of the issue of what I am personally doing. Even if I were the biggest hypocrite in the world who was actively trying to sin as much as I could, then that would just mean that I would need to repent, but it wouldn't change the fact that followers of Christ ought to follow His example of obedience to the Torah (1 Peter 2:21-22).