Prove it from Scripture.
Thy word is truth...once we have the truth, the Holy Spirit can guide us to understanding...yes?
Prove it from Scripture.
The whole point of translating the Bible into any language is to make it available in the then-current language.
The whole point of translating the Bible into any language is to make it available in the then-current language. This is as true for the KJV in 1604 as it is for a translation into a previously-unserved language today. This is not "adjusting the Bible".
Neither is it "adjusting the Bible" to make it available in a current version of the language that is actually used by the majority of that language's speakers.
Does that mean you think the Holy Spirit cannot guide us unless we already have the truth? Be careful how you answer.Thy word is truth...once we have the truth, the Holy Spirit can guide us to understanding...yes?
Really? Where is that in Scripture?Totally agree and I'm all for it. But those translations cannot be considered the holy, pure words of God without error.
Whatever. When you're capable of putting forth a rational argument, you're welcome to do so. Your opinion doesn't account for much.Dung...rubbish...garbage...the chosen word doesn't really matter since they're all bad.
Why start now?Does that mean you think the Holy Spirit cannot guide us unless we already have the truth? Be careful how you answer.
Do they use the KJV?
The two cannot be separated.
I like what Cameron said "False beliefs can come from good translations. I'm not in favor of bad translations, but you use the KJV and still believe in a works salvation and don't believe eternal life is actually eternal. Can't blame that on the version. "
Are all Hebrew/Greek translations the same? Nope. Trying to think through out my 50+ years of bring found by Christ where someone said God told them (lets hope we all believe He does still talks) "that translation (bible) is wrong I never said it like that" Yeah I can't.
If we keep looking/staying in the natural here then sure you will find so many things wrong. Then if its not this its all those other books that never got put in that should have ..oops should not have
Ever have the sweel holy Spirit give you a word and then told you where (chapter and verse) that was in the bible that you never knew about? Oh I so wish it happened all the time but only twice so far in 50+ years. My point is I think back and in those moments NONE of this talk thinking ever popped up. Some of you know this. How many times you talked with GOD and then after "WHAT? How could I not remember to ask Him that/those questions". Because were making something out of nothing.
What's a Calvinist?
What's a Calvinist? Do they claim to be Calvinist's or did you apply the label?Outside the scope of John146’s friends, Calvinists can be either for the KJV Bible-believing position or they can be for Textual Criticism. Calvinists who are into Textual Criticism include James White, John MacArthur, John Piper, and Matt Slick.
Calvinists who are more well-known and believe in the King James Bible as the pure Word of God are Will Kinney, Dr. Ken Matto, and the author of YougTextlessReformed.com (Note: He also has a YouTube Channel). Will Kinney probably has the best apologetic articles involving the KJB (Brandplucked.com).
And yet those verses don't end the beliefs of those you label Calvinists; surprisingly, even the ones who employ the use of the KJB.Calvinists derive their belief ultimately from a man named John Calvin who had a man executed over theological differences.
John Calvin helped to have Michael Servetus burned at the stake because he did not believe in the Trinity.
Granted, denying the Trinity is heresy, but we shouldn’t kill people over it.
Calvinist’s believe in a 5 point belief system called TULIP (Which is false).
Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints.
Ultimately the main belief of Calvinism is fatalism in regards to a person’s salvation (Unconditional Election).
The Calvinists believe God is the one who chooses or forces a person to be saved and He chooses others to not be saved.
Free will of man in choosing salvation does not exist at all in our choice involving God.
Calvinists are confused because there are some verses that sound like Calvinism at first glance (like John 6:44, and Romans 9), but they are not reading these pieces of Scripture in context.
Verses that should end the argument of Calvinism are:
2 Thessalonians 2:10 - The reason why the wicked perish is because they received not the love of the truth that they MIGHT be saved.
Jonah 3 - God tells Jonah judgment is coming for Nineveh in 40 days, and when they forsake their evil ways, that is when God turns back and bringing judgment upon them.
Psalms 7:11 - God is angry at the wicked every day.
Matthew 23:37 - Jesus says that He desire for the people of Jerusalem to be gathered to Him like a hen gathers her chicks, but they would not allow Him to do so.
There is a lot more verses of course, but these are just a couple of the heavy hitter verses that refutes this false belief.
God's word cannot be separated from God Himself, but He is necessarily greater than His word, and exists independently of it.
And yet those verses don't end the beliefs of those you label Calvinists; surprisingly, even the ones who employ the use of the KJB.
Yes. Calvinists use the KJB as much as anyone else, although if they had a choice they would stick to the Geneva Bible.And yet those verses don't end the beliefs of those you label Calvinists; surprisingly, even the ones who employ the use of the KJB.
And yet those verses don't end the beliefs of those you label Calvinists; surprisingly, even the ones who employ the use of the KJB.
Yes. Calvinists use the KJB as much as anyone else, although if they had a choice they would stick to the Geneva Bible.
But Calvinism is not the issue here. The issue is to show that there are good reasons to use the KJB exclusively in order to avoid errors. No one should claim that it is "inspired" (a "God-breathed" translation). But all should admit that it is the only faithful and trustworthy translation in the English language at present, because it fairly represents the majority of Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. And it also has many qualities that make it an excellent translation. Even the History web site supports this position:
Emerging at a high point in the English Renaissance, the King James Bible held its own among some of the most celebrated literary works in the English language (think William Shakespeare). Its majestic cadences would inspire generations of artists, poets, musicians and political leaders, while many of its specific phrases worked their way into the fabric of the language itself.
Even now, more than four centuries after its publication, the King James Bible (a.k.a. the King James Version, or simply the Authorized Version) remains the most famous Bible translation in history—and one of the most printed books ever.
https://www.history.com/news/king-james-bible-most-popular
So much for the detractors of the King James Bible.
Red herring. Follow the logic of my post.Psalms 138:2
”I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.”
This truth is changed in Modern Bibles. No wonder you do not believe it.