Figment

[BonnieClaire]

If you don’t know fallible humans write then you are very confused.

I'll be praying for you . . .

1 Thessalonians 5:17
Pray without ceasing. ~KJV

 

[Cameron143]

God/s are repeated figments.

According to you, all I need is evidence. Are you changing your stance?

 

[Serk]

I'll be praying for you . . .

1 Thessalonians 5:17
Pray without ceasing. ~KJV

Writing is a recent, paintings even come before words.

 

[Serk]

According to you, all I need is evidence. Are you changing your stance?

There is mountains of evidence God/s are figments. No other God would be talked about or worshipped in any culture/time, if a particular God existed and was in communication with humans. Your particular figment was created by humans in the Middle East.

 

[Nehemiah6]

Humans have only started to explore the within cosmos.

Never mind about what is within the cosmos. If you cannot tell us how the cosmos came into existence, then you had better start at that point.

 

[ThereRoseaLamb]

As we reside within the cosmos. So that’s all we can speak of or investigate.

That doesn't change what I said.

 

[Cameron143]

There is mountains of evidence God/s are figments. No other God would be talked about or worshipped in any culture/time, if a particular God existed and was in communication with humans. Your particular figment was created by humans in the Middle East.

Actually, my figment created you. He existed long before figments. He just hasn't introduced Himself to you personally. But back to the reality of this thread: did you change your stance on the sufficiency of evidence as proof of existence?

 

[Serk]

Never mind about what is within the cosmos. If you cannot tell us how the cosmos came into existence, then you had better start at that point.

The cosmos is all we know exists and knowledge of what’s within it is limited. But carry on as a limited human that you know something more.

 

[Serk]

That doesn't change what I said.

Maybe you just cannot be honest with yourself and acknowledge that you are just a human within the cosmos. Who has limited knowledge of what even exists. I find it comical we have humans in the world stating they know the particulars of something more.

 

[Serk]

Actually, my figment created you. He existed long before figments. He just hasn't introduced Himself to you personally. But back to the reality of this thread: did you change your stance on the sufficiency of evidence as proof of existence?

The reality of the thread is in my first post. It’s actually comical we have humans in the world that simply cannot acknowledge they know nothing more than what resides in the cosmos and what we know of that is minuscule. But here we are with fallible humans who are bound to the cosmos stating they know the particulars of something beyond it. When it only resides in their imagination. Obviously.

 

[Magenta]

As you can see the fossil record. It’s your failure to acknowledge death existed before humans.

You can see the Biblical record. Why do you deny it?

 

[Magenta]

... you are just a human within the cosmos. Who has limited knowledge of what even exists. I find it comical we have humans in the world stating they know the particulars of something more.

You pretend to know more than others, and deny what we know to be true.

 

[Eli1]

Humans cannot investigate anything but the cosmos they reside within. That’s why anyone telling you anything beyond it is simply in their imagination.

You're left with a free-willed choice again to accept or reject a non-caused or caused first-mover from the Big Bang.

Because when this cosmos was created it was created by .... guess what? By something outside the cosmos. So naturally and reasonably we say that "Something" is outside this cosmos.
Q.E.D.

Next?

 

[Cameron143]

The reality of the thread is in my first post. It’s actually comical we have humans in the world that simply cannot acknowledge they know nothing more than what resides in the cosmos and what we know of that is minuscule. But here we are with fallible humans who are bound to the cosmos stating they know the particulars of something beyond it. When it only resides in their imagination. Obviously.

What's even more comical is people making claims about what reality is while admitting they have partial experience of reality.

 

[Eli1]

What's even more comical is people making claims about what reality is while admitting they have partial experience of reality.

His reality was expanded on Reddit Atheist forums with superb logic.

 

[Serk]

Because when this cosmos was created it was created by .... guess what? By something outside the cosmos. So naturally and reasonably we say that "Something" is outside this cosmos.
Q.E.D.

Next?

You haven’t observed anything created or anything outside. But carry on telling me about your imagination😂

 

[Eli1]

So you're telling me that you're blind too? I didn't know that.
We have observed via telescopes in space, a time right after 300 million years after creation. Before that things were smaller and smaller and smaller and before that it was "something" that initiated this whole thing Outside of our universe.

You would know this if you were to choose the correct response on the polls about these questions.

 

[Serk]

What's even more comical is people making claims about what reality is while admitting they have partial experience of reality.

Object - outside of reality, never observed. Imaginary.

 

[Serk]

So you're telling me that you're blind too? I didn't know that.
We have observed via telescopes in space, a time right after 300 million years after creation. Before that things were smaller and smaller and smaller and before that it was "something" that initiated this whole thing Outside of our universe.

You would know this if you were to choose the correct response on the polls about these questions.

That’s just your figment this something.

 

[Nehemiah6]

The cosmos is all we know exists and knowledge of what’s within it is limited. But carry on as a limited human that you know something more.

So you simply dodged the question. Therefore you are even more limited than you think.