How so? Does the single word have multiple origins? I suspect not. Rather, it is simply a word used for several things within a single category.Example of hebrew homonym is elohim
How so? Does the single word have multiple origins? I suspect not. Rather, it is simply a word used for several things within a single category.Example of hebrew homonym is elohim
Why not study the original language? We have at least one KJVonly person participating on this thread that believes in the false doctrine of loss of salvation. The original language puts even more emphasis on the truth of eternal security of the believer.Where, In Scripture, does It say I have to be a "foreign language scholar," When
The Omnipotent God [ that I know ] Preserved His Pure, Perfect, and Holy Word,
for me [ His child ], in my own language? He not only Sent The Blessed Teacher,
The Holy Spirit, Specified Certain study rules, But, Also Much More about:
Handling His Precious Word Of Life!
Amen.
Y'know, if these KJV-only types start doing their homework, learning the original languages, and getting proper understanding of the text, they're going to stop arguing in favour of the KJV and get on with being decent Christian folks. Are you sure that's what you want?Why not study the original language? We have at least one KJVonly person participating on this thread that believes in the false doctrine of loss of salvation. The original language puts even more emphasis on the truth of eternal security of the believer.
JOH 5:24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My Word, and believes Him Who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.”
"Truly,truly" is a sentential participle. It puts emphasis on what is being said. A point of doctrine. Pay very close attention, because this will be attacked by the kingdom of darkness! It's a tremendously important point of doctrine.
"does not come into judgement" ~~ kai eis krisin ouk erchetai[and into judgment not comes] Notice 'ouk' in the phrase. When it is joined to a verb(judgement), it is used to strongly deny that this will NEVER NO,NEVER happen to the subject. The believer emphatically NEVER comes into judgement, not ever.
erchetai~~~~ comes. It is in the present tense.........This habitually continues to be true. And it is in the middle voice,indicating that someone else did the work and the subject(believer) benefits from it.
All this is at our finger tips. Why not utilize it? It helps us to defend the Faith and it helps us grow in His grace and knowledge. We can't get this 'bonus' material from reading English.
https://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Greek_Index.htm
https://www.preceptaustin.org/
Thanks, I'm glad you able to utilize such tools For Emphasis.All this is at our finger tips.
I can barely spell my own name. I'm a contractor that builds houses. I think you can do it.Thanks, I'm glad you able to utilize such tools For Emphasis.
But, some of us are simpletons, eh?
And, my spanish-speaking 'amigos' would give me strange looks, if I started to
tell them "Way More ( Hebrew and Greek ) information" than a simple English
to Spanish conversation, that being Enough language 'scholarship' for them,
being simpletons also, eh?
Does God Really Want His Simple Will to be turned in Complexity, since
even "trained theologians" can't even agree with each other?
Where is the "bonus material" of The Simplicity of Christ?
Amen.
I am really not sure where all of this came from.................
Amplified is very close, it's good to get a Bible that has at least 2 versions or even 4 is better...then you can read the verse in several translations....But let's face it...if you don't have God helping you to understand ANY version, you probably won't get what's being said or understand it. God's word and His Holy Spirit is so powerful and amazing it can communicate the message to your heart and spirit..no matter what the translations. I challenge you to read through the entire KJV Old and New testaments a couple times, praying for God to open up your understanding to the Word of God....Then I think you can make comments and move on. You have to put the footwork in.
Y'know, if these KJV-only types start doing their homework, learning the original languages, and getting proper understanding of the text, they're going to stop arguing in favour of the KJV and get on with being decent Christian folks. Are you sure that's what you want?
![]()
I wanted to say this to you while I can, due to my health and circumstances I do not know how long I have left I have almost died seven times in the year 2023 and part of me can hear the church bells the other part speaks of life and the ability to give it in abundence the church bells ring of death it is a solem and almost emotionless sound but at the same time I feel a fire not a normal one when I first encountered the holy spirit I saw him as a flame made of raindow colors the colors themsevles were not just vivid but they themselves seemed to burndearest, you may know him best as Darth Vader from the first Star Wars film.
you are in my prayers always. ♥
Your motive is to try to convince yourself that somehow your arguments aren't logical fallacies. It works for you, but no one else except those also deceived.But I got motive. Your side accuses us falsely that we worship the KJB (all because we believe the Bible is perfect).
Modern Bibles conveniently downgrade the importance of how God views His Word so we cannot quote this verse back to them with them even regarding this verse. Their Bible has demoted the importance of God’s Word which conveniently fits their viewpoint of the word.
The examples I gave are also true homonyms. You seem to have difficulty with many language rules.A true example of a homonym:
The bark of the dog echoed up the tree at the squirrel who was hanging on the bark of the tree at the top near the branches.
So the word “bark” in this sentence is a homonym.
It comes from the "Aramaic" EL. Keep in mind the New Testament calls Hebrew-- the "Aramaic" quotes that it has.How so? Does the single word have multiple origins? I suspect not. Rather, it is simply a word used for several things within a single category.
Oh believe me I am by no means at my best I am in a very dark place a place of uncertanty my life may become much worse or if God intervenes it could be for the better I have never needed a miracle more than nowso true friend
Wise words from our father. Nice to see you back too.. and good to see you back to your best![]()
I guess it's possible; I don't know the relevant dates.Just curious though,,,if they do in 1465BCE,(approx) when Moses wrote those books wouldn't he have written them in Proto Sinaitic or Paleo Hebrew script and not the modern Hebrew? Not that I'm a KJV only thinker, I'm not just that the oldest copies we have were translated into the Hebrew we have today...
I don't know why I bother trying to explain Scripture to you when you struggle with basic grammar.
A homonym is a single thing, not a 'they' which is plural.
You said:You might say "Homonyms are words that look and sound the same but have different meanings" which is basically the dictionary definition. An example is "seal" which is both a marine animal and guard against leaks. "Book" and "scroll" are not homonyms.
You said:And more than just those two.
You said:No, it isn't. You simply have the wrong word for the concept. A homonym is a single word, not a phrase.
You said:I assure you, it isn't. The context is about wild beasts that take over the land of Idumea after it is destroyed under the Lord's wrath.
I guess it's possible; I don't know the relevant dates.![]()
no way you even darth vadar reading the bible? oh boy if I wanted to listen to the word before the starwars geek in me is even more excitied that could actually bring a lot people to listen to his word and be saved did you know there is a section in nasa called c3po? the world is ruled by nerds and geeks it is awesome.Hi Blain,
It's lunch for me and found the audio Bible that I lost in bookmarks a while back.
I read the Bible out loud every day to practice for a recording like this. It's a big goal for me, because I want to be a blessing to many others. Here's an old recording of the most famous audio KJV recording. I've had others, including Darth Vader reading the Bible; Lol, James Earl Jones. It would have been better without the mask and scary breathing though.
Of all, Alexander Scourby is my favorite reader. You'll want to either download or bookmark this. If voices are able to be CR, I think his copyright would have expired by now since he died. The book isn't, unlike the other versions. Many hours of blessings my friend.
https://earnestlycontendingforthefaith.com/ListenToTheKingJamesBible.html
I never heard of C3PO. That's hilarious!no way you even darth vadar reading the bible? oh boy if I wanted to listen to the word before the starwars geek in me is even more excitied that could actually bring a lot people to listen to his word and be saved did you know there is a section in nasa called c3po? the world is ruled by nerds and geeks it is awesome.
You are clearly unaware of the history behind the KJV. Please, go and do your homework. Start with Desiderius Erasmus and his five editions of the Greek text. Move on to the work of Robert Estienne (aka Stephanus), and Theodore Beza, and their work in revising the Greek text, Finally, look at the KJV translators in using all of these and many more in preparing the KJV. Then, when you have actualy done your homework, then come back and talk to us about "constantly questioning and criticizing the text". Until then, you're blathering in sheer ignorance.
The examples I gave are also true homonyms. You seem to have difficulty with many language rules.
A lot of people read Shakespeare too.Interesting fact:
I just found out that some people actually believe that Shakespeare wrote the KJ![]()