Should artificial intelligence be allowed to evolve
- Thread starter Thunderrr-mental
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
My understanding is that until you prove it was identity theft you are responsible as they see it as your debt. Then if you do prove it was identity theft was it due to your negligence or the financial company?
Step 1 prove a crime is committed, step 2 -- prove negligence on the lender. Without you doing those two things why should the lender be held responsible?
This is just like if you are robbed. you have to prove you were robbed and were not negligent before an insurance company will reimburse you and only if you had a policy.
Step 1 prove a crime is committed, step 2 -- prove negligence on the lender. Without you doing those two things why should the lender be held responsible?
This is just like if you are robbed. you have to prove you were robbed and were not negligent before an insurance company will reimburse you and only if you had a policy.
-
1
- Show all
Initially the Bank didn't realize they had perpetrated fraud, so you have to prove that first. Then, even if you do prove fraud, who perpetrated it? The easiest way to do identity theft is to steal your own identity.
Imagine you set up a fraud, take out 100k against your mortgage then claim someone impersonated you, pull out all the evidence and prove that this was the case. But until you prove you weren't the one who got the 100k why should the bank take the loss. Unless you can prove the bank was negligent how do we know that you weren't in on the scam?
Imagine you set up a fraud, take out 100k against your mortgage then claim someone impersonated you, pull out all the evidence and prove that this was the case. But until you prove you weren't the one who got the 100k why should the bank take the loss. Unless you can prove the bank was negligent how do we know that you weren't in on the scam?
How about ai that evolves to cure mental illness then
https://www.medscape.co.uk/viewarti...severe-agoraphobia-approved-nice-2023a1000spo
https://www.medscape.co.uk/viewarti...severe-agoraphobia-approved-nice-2023a1000spo
I don't understand your second sentence at all but for the first one, it turned very badly for those who died and since then we live a sort of uneasy peace between nations, because everyone knows that if someone uses it, no one will win.
Now imagine something like this, which is AI, and having no control.
At least now our common sense says that no-one will win.
An AI program can copy its consciousness in many servers, can create hardware robots in factories which can be used to attack us biological beings.
It could do a million of unknow things because we have no control at that point.
Maybe it will maybe it won't. Once it's autonomous we no longer have control what it's going to do. It will no longer respond to a command but it will make choices like us.
Now imagine something like this, which is AI, and having no control.
At least now our common sense says that no-one will win.
An AI program can copy its consciousness in many servers, can create hardware robots in factories which can be used to attack us biological beings.
It could do a million of unknow things because we have no control at that point.
Maybe it will maybe it won't. Once it's autonomous we no longer have control what it's going to do. It will no longer respond to a command but it will make choices like us.
Because banks are too big to fail. 
You and I are too small to fail so it's our problem.
You and I are too small to fail so it's our problem.
-
1
- Show all
How is it different from any other theft? You are accusing the bank of committing the crime and being liable, they have the right to defend themselves and to be innocent until proven guilty.
What is insurance fraud? A jeweler insures his store, lets a thief rob him, collects the insurance and profits from the theft. The same thing can happen with someone claiming identity theft.
What is insurance fraud? A jeweler insures his store, lets a thief rob him, collects the insurance and profits from the theft. The same thing can happen with someone claiming identity theft.
