Bad analogy. A rich, deep treasure trove is better.
Matthew 13:44
Bad analogy. A rich, deep treasure trove is better.
I would recommend his book on Benjamin Franklin
Thomas Jefferson did the same... Jefferson’s Bible focused on Jesus as a man of morals,Benjamin Franklin is famous for cutting portions of scripture out of his bible,
the bible verses that he did not believe were true. This guy was definitely not
a Christian even though he recognized some truths found in the Bible.
Thomas Jefferson did the same... Jefferson’s Bible focused on Jesus as a man of morals,
a teacher whose truths were expressed without the help of miracles or the supernatural
powers of God. It didn’t include major events like the resurrection or ascension
to heaven or miracles like turning water into wine or walking on water.
Are you sure that wasn't Thomas Jefferson?Benjamin Franklin is famous for cutting portions of scripture out of his bible, the bible verses that he did not believe were true.
Benjamin Franklin was not a Christian even though he believed in some supreme being.
Benjamin Franklin was a mason and wrote The Constitutions of the Free-Masons was the first American Masonic book. Originally published in London in 1723
A lot of people believe there is some supreme being and for 33rd degree masons they believe that supreme being is satan. (read Morals and Dogmas by Albert Pyke who the masons consider to the authority on what the masonic order believes)
Benjamin Franklin is famous for cutting portions of scripture out of his bible, the bible verses that he did not believe were true. This guy was definitely not a Christian even though he recognized some truths found in the Bible.
George Washington was also a high ranking member of the masonic lodge. There was a very strong presence of occult activity among the founding fathers.
It is going fine.You still have not answered the question if you are grateful to be an American.
Again, deeply disturbing you are not answering this simple question.
Perhaps it is time to move to Venezuela so you can see the difference.
Let me know how it goes.
Also, do all NKJV have the same cover? Somehow, I doubt it...
Increasingly, I am often seeing bad doctrine coming from. KJV Onlyists.

..............I don't - but, today - everyone is in it for the money. Show me even one [English] translation since the KJV that:
~ is a good-and-correct translation from the same historically accepted manuscripts
(because Westcott-Hort, etc. are corrupted manuscripts)
~ was 'published' by the authors into the public domain (no one actually "owns" the text)
~ no one is making any 'royalty' money from the translation (not talking about printing physical copies)
Could another English translation possibly be made from the same manuscripts? Sure. Is anyone likely to do it? No. Why? I will save that for another post if you really do not understand why I say this and would like for me to expound on it a bit...
Thanks, I'll listen to that this evening while working on my planner for 2024.
Here's one you might be interested in. I like the bible museum section.
Yes, by speaking to us in plain modern-day English and not the cumbersome Elizabethan English of hundreds of years ago.some in the Modern Translation movement will make it seem like you cannot truly understand God's Word
just by reading the Bible in English. This is not the plainness of speech that God employs. While God can speak
in metaphor or parables, He also speaks in plainness of speech, too. This has to apply to our life today in some way.
Yes, by speaking to us in plain modern-day English and not the cumbersome Elizabethan English of hundreds of years ago.
That would include the KJV! Many legitimate reasons have been given but KJ onlyists largely ignore them.there is no one standard Modern English Bible that is the set standard or the perfect Word of God.