It amazes me how similar these people are today as they were 2000 years ago. Recount what the apostle Stephen testified of them, before they martyred him:The primary mission of every Christian is to spread the Gospel in the hopes that the Holy Spirit will activate the dormant faith in unbelievers.
This lady has been presented the Gospel in varying ways, even from the Torah. As yet, she has remained Spiritually blinded, and has rejected her Jewish Messiah.
Her religion, which is some type of Talmudic Orthodox Judaism, is no different than every other religion on earth. The Jews have no Temple. They have no way to cover over their sins (the blood of animals can NEVER remove them permanently) with the sacrifice of animals. Which is exactly what the Torah demands of them.
So they have come up with a works based theology to pay for sin. Just like Islam, Mormonism, JWs, Hindus, Buddhists, etc….
She remains engaged on a Christian chat website. So maybe the Holy Spirit will soften her heart to receive Him. Why else would one who does not believe in the Messiah stay?
Yes! I will pray. ♥The primary mission of every Christian is to spread the Gospel in the hopes that the Holy Spirit will activate the dormant faith in unbelievers.
This lady has been presented the Gospel in varying ways, even from the Torah. As yet, she has remained Spiritually blinded, and has rejected her Jewish Messiah.
Her religion, which is some type of Talmudic Orthodox Judaism, is no different than every other religion on earth. The Jews have no Temple. They have no way to cover over their sins (the blood of animals can NEVER remove them permanently) with the sacrifice of animals. Which is exactly what the Torah demands of them.
So they have come up with a works based theology to pay for sin. Just like Islam, Mormonism, JWs, Hindus, Buddhists, etc….
She remains engaged on a Christian chat website. So maybe the Holy Spirit will soften her heart to receive Him. Why else would one who does not believe in the Messiah stay?
How do we know there are three pillars?The pillars of the Jewish religion
.
The prophet said he would come out of Judah- it's a true statement. But it doesn't say that you need to personally verify the DNA and genealogy of the messiah.According to Moses and the Prophets they are waiting for a Messiah of the tribe of Judah. How would they know today who is from the tribe of Judah?
And in Jesus time, it was controlled by a maniac that had jewish boys massacred. God beats the odds every time.He is to be born in Bethlehem, a town that is controlled by the Muslims and predominantly all Muslim.
Factually incorrect. It's actually closer to 200 than it is to 2000.He is supposed to be the lamb of God which takes away the sins of the world. That means He is to be killed like the Passover lamb, hung on a cross to drain the blood. No one has been crucified for almost two thousand years.
Why can't the messiah ride a donkey? What did donkeys ever do to you? It's certainly the exception more than the rule; but people still utilize donkeys where it is practical to do so.He is supposed to ride into Jerusalem on a donkey, that would be ridiculous today.
ZNP, bro- I could be wrong, but, I feel like you skipped breakfast or something today.
The prophet said he would come out of Judah- it's a true statement. But it doesn't say that you need to personally verify the DNA and genealogy of the messiah.
I don't take single passages of the Tanakh and "interpret" them. I believe Tanakh interprets Tanakh and context matters.
Asking the way you do also feels like your trying to assess me, something I also highly dislike.
So then line upon line? This is how I eventually came to understand scripture but I see in the English Tanakh it is line for a line
Does that change the meaning?
I've learned a lot from this thread and your responses. I appreciate it.
I'll admit that it is much preferable to me to speak to an actual person rather than sifting a bunch of information on the internet to reconcile opposing beliefs about who Messiah is/might be.
Which version of the Torah are You using? The Chabad claims the Nephilim are from the sons of nobles, while other Torah versions use sons of God. What's interesting, both are referring to heavenly beings. By understanding this much, for them to be with human women means disobedience. So these heavenly beings were disobeying God directly. If this is true, Nephilim would be part fallen heavenly being and part human. In the Talmud, using examples from the Oral Tradition of Enoch, they claim when a Nephilim died its spirit became demons. This generally is a well known traditional Jewish idealism.Translating languages, even modern ones, is not easy because sometimes there is no word/phrase that matches 1 to 1. When it's an ancient language like classical Hebrew it's all the harder. Genesis 6 talks about Nephilim which is translated numerous ways but we don't actually know what it means... the exact meaning lost to history. Therefore sometimes we have to make our best guess or slot in something that is close but not exact which can alter the meaning slightly.
Which version of the Torah are You using? The Chabad claims the Nephilim are from the sons of nobles, while other Torah versions use sons of God. What's interesting, both are referring to heavenly beings. By understanding this much, for them to be with human women means disobedience. So these heavenly beings were disobeying God directly. If this is true, Nephilim would be part fallen heavenly being and part human. In the Talmud, using examples from the Oral Tradition of Enoch, they claim when a Nephilim died its spirit became demons. This generally is a well known traditional Jewish idealism.
Jewish Concepts: Demons & Demonology
View attachment 258951
Jewish Virtual Library
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org › demons-and-de...
In contrast, the Zohar, following a talmudic legend, stresses the origin of the demons in sexual intercourse between humans and demonic powers.
For Orthodox Jews (or even non-Orthodox Jews) the NT is in fact "taboo". After all they do not want their adherents to know the truth about Christ. This goes all the way back to the enemies of Jesus of Nazareth. They saw and heard everything but shut their eyes and ears to the truth. And this was already prophesied long before it happened....or is the NT a sort of 'taboo' material you must steer away from?
I suppose it must be if it is compared to a Danny's menu, which offers bacon strips and sausage links with their scrambled eggs and buttermilk biscuits.For Orthodox Jews (or even non-Orthodox Jews) the NT is in fact "taboo". After all they do not want their adherents to know the truth about Christ. This goes all the way back to the enemies of Jesus of Nazareth. They saw and heard everything but shut their eyes and ears to the truth. And this was already prophesied long before it happened.
For Orthodox Jews (or even non-Orthodox Jews) the NT is in fact "taboo". After all they do not want their adherents to know the truth about Christ. This goes all the way back to the enemies of Jesus of Nazareth. They saw and heard everything but shut their eyes and ears to the truth. And this was already prophesied long before it happened.
I suppose it must be if it is compared to a Danny's menu, which offers bacon strips and sausage links with their scrambled eggs and buttermilk biscuits.
So it is in fact mentally "taboo", even though technically it is not forbidden or prohibited.I'm only saying quoting it to a Jewish person is going to mean as much as said menu because we don't believe in it.
Dude, how about not speaking on behalf of another group you know nothing about? It is not taboo, I have read the first four Gospels, 1st, 2nd and 3rd John, Revelations and Hebrews. My husband's bible is sitting on my computer desk. My Rabbi has read the entire New Testament. Do some of you realize how foolish you look to us when you assume without asking?
I'm not equating the bible to a Denny's menu. I realize it's important to Christians and I wouldn't be that cavalier towards something important to them. I'm only saying quoting it to a Jewish person is going to mean as much as said menu because we don't believe in it. If the Tanakh says the things people are claiming they should be able to demonstrate that from the Tanakh, or show how the Christian bible isn't contradicting it.
So it is in fact mentally "taboo", even though technically it is not forbidden or prohibited.
After all an unbiased person would take a very careful look at any writing which claims to be divinely inspired to see if it were true or false. And those who would do so for the New Testament would soon discover that it is God's truth. To even consider that countless millions of people have believed on Christ for over 2,000 years should give pause to any unbiased person.
Also you have read only a few of the NT books (totally avoiding Paul's epistles), and probably never studied even one of them carefully..