Aviva, how do you interpret Gen 1:1,2?Depends on who you ask. That's such a broad question.
Aviva, how do you interpret Gen 1:1,2?Depends on who you ask. That's such a broad question.
Aviva, how do you interpret Gen 1:1,2?
You still haven't shown me where it says G-d blinded them, "spiritually" or otherwise. Until you've demonstrated that point the rest of your question it moot.
2 Cor. 3:12-16 (ESV)
12 Since we have such a hope, we are very bold, 13 not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face so that the Israelites might not gaze at the outcome of what was being brought to an end. 14 But their minds were hardened. For to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted, because only through Christ is it taken away. 15 Yes, to this day whenever Moses is read a veil lies over their hearts. 16 But when one turns to the Lord, the veil is removed.
I don't care what the New Testament says. If what he says is correct it should be demonstrable in Isaiah.
Do you believe that the books from Genesis to Malachi are God's inspired Word?I don't care what the New Testament says. If what he says is correct it should be demonstrable in Isaiah.
Rep. Clay Higgins Speaks Out | Lara Logan Interviews Higgins About Jan. 6 In Bombshell InterviewAs an aside Lara Logan has just done a wonderful job of investigative journalism showing that many of these ones who posted about the Jan. 6th event online were actually FBI agents. We know there were two bus loads of FBI "assets/agents" at the capital. We should not be surprised if they also are coming onto Christian chat now that this is an election year.
It is quite intriguing how Isaiah 53 describes the "Right Arm," the Messiah, as being lowly, tortured, and one of suffering. But nowhere in the Old Testament is there a "warning" that Israel would be blinded to it. And still, Paul, writes that God blinded the Jews. Odd to have fulfillment without first being prophesied.
Do you believe that the books from Genesis to Malachi are God's inspired Word?
Doesn't Jesus quote Isaiah 6 in Matthew 13 as the reason the unbelieving do not understand the parables? It doesn't mention a veil, but the veil in 2 Corinthians 3 was symbolic of spiritual blindness.It is quite intriguing how Isaiah 53 describes the "Right Arm," the Messiah, as being lowly, tortured, and one of suffering. But nowhere in the Old Testament is there a "warning" that Israel would be blinded to it. And still, Paul, writes that God blinded the Jews. Odd to have fulfillment without first being prophesied.
It isn't. It's about Jesus. Chapter 54 goes on to describe the benefits that result from His suffering. Chapter 55 is a call to come into relationship. And chapter 56 explains how.Isaiah 53 is not a Messianic verse. The suffering servant is Israel.
I understand.
I hope that you can also understand that Christians believe that this Scripture is as inspired by God as anything in the Old Testament and/or Tanakh.
Isaiah 53:4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.Isaiah 53 is not a Messianic verse. The suffering servant is Israel.
So just Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, but not the prophets or poetic books?The Torah was given to Moses by G-d on mount Sinai. All other scripture must conform to it (The Talmud, the Nevi'im, the Ketuvim etc...). All are scripture but only the Torah was directly written by G-d's hand.
I'm not interested in what apostates think either. If it means Jesus then feel free to demonstrate that fact.
That's totally fine.
I'm the one you're trying to convince here and I don't accept Christian scriptures. If what you claim is true it should be demonstrable from the Tanakh. I will never ever accept a theological position that says G-D has altered, changed or gone back on his word.