N
Niki7
Guest
Why was it a curse?
If all of us obeyed the law perfectly... what a beautiful place it would be.
If it was replaced how is the new law less of a curse?
right. Jesus would not have had to make the trip down here
Why was it a curse?
If all of us obeyed the law perfectly... what a beautiful place it would be.
If it was replaced how is the new law less of a curse?
From the Bible only.
Jesus kept the Sabbath in His day, Paul kept the Sabbath.
The law is holy and no verse states a change to the moral law.
The cerimonial laws finished at the cross.
But the moral law has not changed.
The verse above talks about a change.
What was the change? Use the Bible please.
Please don't presume that the 10 commandments have changed or been removed.
I spent a long time showing that the 10 commandments are different to the laws of Moses. No. 316.
Why was it a curse?
If all of us obeyed the law perfectly... what a beautiful place it would be.
If it was replaced how is the new law less of a curse?
What did Jesus say about keeping the law can you quote? Does Jesus words and teaching mean anything anymore? Jesus is the ultimate authority on all things forever.and one more thing....yeah I know...shad up already
the Bible says people are cursed to follow the law...wondering how that affects our walk with God if we keep saying that's not true![]()
Some of your facts are wrong.
The Law (which includes the 10 Commandments) was a covenant given to Moses and all who were at Sinai only. This is what Moses said and wrote:
"The Lord our God made a covenant with us in Horeb. The Lord did not make this covenant with our fathers, but with us, those who are here today, all of us who are alive."
But, the covenant between God the Father and God the Son was ratified before creation.
"All who dwell on the earth will worship him, whose names have not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world."
The law that defines sin that both Paul and Jesus say is the Ten Commandments Romans 7:7 Mat 5:19-30 is not the same law that was added because of sin, where is the sense in that. The law that was added until the Seed shall come was animal sacrifices in the law of Moses that was a placeholder pointing forward to Jesus until the Seed shall come as the blood of animals is not perfect for the forgiveness of sins Hebrews 10:1-22, but the blood of Jesus is for cleansing of all sin and unrighteousness 1 John 1:9 so now instead of sacrificing animals to an earthy priest we can go directly to Jesus when we sin. The Ten Commandments is like a mirror Romans 3:20 and all it does is shows us our sin and our need for Jesus if we cover our sins, we can't prosper but if we confess and forsake our sins we can go directly to Jesus for His mercy grace and sanctification. Pro 28:13The promises of this covenant began to vest with Abraham 430 years before the Law was given.
"Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Christ. And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later...
Later than what? Later than the promises that were given to Abraham. Those promises were given to Abraham first, before the law..
Let's continue...
"..cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ..."
When was it confirmed? From the foundation of the world as I quoted above. The price of the covenant between God the Father and God the Son was paid "from the foundation of the world". THEN, everything that was made was made through Christ. All of creation contains the divine template for death, resurrection, and redemption. Every kernel of wheat, corn, and any grain we consume bears this template.
Jesus summed up the covenant in this way:
"Most assuredly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain. He who loves his life will lose it, and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life. If anyone serves Me, let him follow Me; and where I am, there My servant will be also. If anyone serves Me, him My Father will honor."
This is redemption through death and resurrection.
"..that it should make the promise of no effect."
So, the Law, given 430 years AFTER the promises vested in Abraham, has no effect on those promises. None. In fact, the Law was never given to Abraham. He functioned under the covenant between God the Father and God the Son that was ratified BEFORE creation was made. Christ is the means back to THIS covenant. And this covenant does not require the strength of man to remain whole: it is kept by God the Father and God the Son.
This is what Paul meant when he wrote the next verse:
"For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer of promise; but God gave it to Abraham by promise."
Furthermore:
Also, the Law was added because of transgressions. The transgressions occurred at Sinai 430 years after the promises were given to Abraham. When God instructed the Jews at Sinai to “come close” they, instead, “stood afar off” and sent Moses in their stead. This is the pattern of priest/laity that God gave them in the Law. However, had they drawn close to God, they would have become “a kingdom of priests and a holy nation”. Under the Law only one tribe of 12 were allowed to be priests. Under the covenant between God the Son and God the Father, ALL become priests and a holy nation.
Under the Law the priests represent the people before God. Under the covenant ratified by God the Son and God the Father, the priests represent God to the world.
Go under the Law at your own peril. God is not working there any more. You will be alone.
Hi there Aaron, nice to meet you.......happy to address the scriptures you references.
My instruction comes from God's Word. Jesus said not to break or teach others to break the least of these commandments quoting directly from the Ten as one would be in fear of sin and judgement Mat 5:19-30 but instead we should teach others to keep His commandments , I have faith in Him to mean what He says. Thanks for the chat.I wrote that for your instruction. Because you teach the Law as "valid for the believer today" you're unable to teach anything.
Lead a horse to water something something.
Jesus of Nazareth did in fact observe the Sabbath. But He also frequently healed on Sabbath days (and was condemned for it). But He also said that He is LORD of the Sabbath. Which meant that He would decide how the Sabbath commandment would apply to Christians.Jesus kept the Sabbath in His day, Paul kept the Sabbath.
Jesus of Nazareth did in fact observe the Sabbath. But He also frequently healed on Sabbath days (and was condemned for it). But He also said that He is LORD of the Sabbath. Which meant that He would decide how the Sabbath commandment would apply to Christians.
When He cried "It Is Finished" on the cross, God tore down the temple veil at the same time. Does this have any bearing on Sabbath-keeping? Absolutely. Both these things meant that Christ had fulfilled the Law, and brought in the New Covenant. And under the New Covenant He established "the Lord's Day" (the first day of the week) as the Christian Sabbath.
Even though the Sabbath commandment is in the Ten Commandments, it is also SPECIFICALLY given to Israel as a "sign" between God and Israel: Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep the sabbath, to observe the sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever: for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed.
But there is no such commandment given to the Church. So Sabbatarians are in fact opposing God by insisting on going back to the Law of Moses. And since Paul called the Sabbath a shadow, it is hardly likely that he would insist on Christians observing the seventh day Sabbath. According to Hebrews, believers have entered into the Sabbath of God. For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. (Heb 4:3)
Your misapplied quotation from Christ has absolutely no bearing on the subject. And yes, here is the Scripture on which you should meditate: I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet... (Rev 1:10) Did John conjure up the Lord's Day on his own, or did Christ give the Lord's Day to the Church?Do you have a scripture Text for this? Jesus said heaven and earth would pass before one dot of the law would change. Heaven and earth are still here, therefore so is God's holy law.
Do you believe that the writings of Paul are actually from God the Holy Spirit. If so meditate on this: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. (Col 2:16,17) The 7th day Sabbath was a mere shadow of the eternal rest of the believer in God's eternal Sabbath. And as far as Christians are concerned, all "holy days" from the Law of Moses (which included new moons) are shadows.Where exactly did God say the Sabbath ended?
You said, "Whenever the term day or night is used singularly in the Bible it can mean all or part of a day or evening (night). But the term night (evening) and day together always indicates a 24 hour period."I am going to offer you a different time line …but along the same premise that you have stated.
The Sign
Mat 12:39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:
40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
There are many scripture (19) that give reference to Jesus being raised the third day …. but this account in Matthew ….. Jesus states that He would be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. That was the sign to the unbelieving scribes and Pharisees to whom He was speaking.
Whenever the term day or night is used singularly in the Bible it can mean all or part of a day or evening (night). But the term night (evening) and day together always indicates a 24 hour period. In Gen 1:5, 8,13,19,&23 …. God sets the standard for a full day… of which Jesus was fully aware of as noted in John 11:9.
There are those who try to qualify Jesus’s statement of 3 days and 3 nights with their own twisting and reference to an idiom … The problem is --- they are trying to qualify man’s tradition to fit their belief …but it doesn’t work that way. God sets the standard for truth …not man! …..Man can be right and they can be wrong…. the only way to verify what man states…. is to check it with what God says. My personal belief…. the things I have learned … are irrelevant if they do not line up with the Word of God …and for me…. the Word is the final authority for Truth.
We can track the precise day that Jesus was crucified by counting forward or backward. Forward from John 12:1 or backward from the Passover (which is Nisan 14) or The feast of unleavened bread which was Nisan 15 ....at sunset of the 14th….. (as that is when the next day begins.)
Passover is the 14th but the Passover meal is eaten at the beginning of the 15th (evening). The feast of unleavened bread lasts for 7 days and the first day (Thursday 15th) and last day (Wednesday 21st) of the feast are high days …{that is not 4/20 with the devils lettuce} A high day is a special sabbath as dictated by God → Num 28:18 and Num 28:25 . A special sabbath is different from the weekly sabbath which falls on Saturday. A special sabbath would be like when Christmas (which is always celebrated on 12/25) fell on a Wednesday …it would a special sabbath …but does not negate the weekly sabbath on our Sunday. The special sabbath (high day) for the first day of the feast of unleavened bread (Thursday Nisan 15) is noted in John 19:31 The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) …
CONTINUED
Your misapplied quotation from Christ has absolutely no bearing on the subject. And yes, here is the Scripture on which you should meditate: I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet... (Rev 1:10) Did John conjure up the Lord's Day on his own, or did Christ give the Lord's Day to the Church?
.
Do you believe that the writings of Paul are actually from God the Holy Spirit. If so meditate on this: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. (Col 2:16,17) The 7th day Sabbath was a mere shadow of the eternal rest of the believer in God's eternal Sabbath. And as far as Christians are concerned, all "holy days" from the Law of Moses (which included new moons) are shadows.
My instruction comes from God's Word. Jesus said not to break or teach others to break the least of these commandments quoting directly from the Ten as one would be in fear of sin and judgement Mat 5:19-30 but instead we should teach others to keep His commandments , I have faith in Him to mean what He says. Thanks for the chat.
You said, "Whenever the term day or night is used singularly in the Bible it can mean all or part of a day or evening (night). But the term night (evening) and day together always indicates a 24 hour period."
This is used as evidence that Jesus was in the heart of the earth for exactly 72 hours.
Let me present two arguments against that idea as food for thought. First, how do we know that "the term night (evening) and day together always indicates a 24 hour period."? In 1 Samuel 30:12-13 we find the phrase "three days and three nights" equated with "three days ago", which does not explicitly say but certainly implies that even when the term night and day were used together, they might refer to a part of a 24 hour period rather than the whole thing.
Second, if Jesus had to be in the heart of the earth for literally 72 hours, he would have had to have been raised on the fourth day. But Scripture clearly teaches that Jesus was raised on the third day (Luke 24:7, 24:21; 1 Corinthians 15:4).
If we take the ancient languages and idioms in a modern English sense, couldn't that lead to contradictions in our conclusions?
Now I remember... "But you can't make him drink."
Now you're making a different argument. You said the Sabbath didn't start until Exo 16 and through God's Word He shows us it started at Creation
Hebrews 4:4 For He has spoken in a certain place of the seventh day in this way: “And God rested on the seventh day from all His works”;
Those who rest in Him ALSO cease from their works as God did from His, on the seventh day Hebrews 4:10 Heb 4:4
Which is why the Sabbath-rest remains for God's people Heb 4:9 and the rest in this verse literally means keeping of the Sabbath!