Or the great tribulation?
In a discussion of end-times events, it usually means "abomination of desolation", as it does here. However, in a different context it could mean "Ancient of Days".Wiaod (what is aod)?
It is curious that after Jesus says, "standing in the holy place", He (or the authors) adds, "Let the reader understand" (written in parentheses in English). That suggests there is something unusual about the preceding statement, that it is not "plain for all to comprehend". The phrase could refer to "the abomination of desolation", "the holy place", or perhaps the whole phrase, where "standing in" is the key object. In any case, we would do well not to impose the obvious interpretation to this phrase, and to hold lightly whatever interpretation we do hold. Luke does not include this statement, but his "condition" is plain and obvious.Jesus told the people. When you SEE THE ABOMINATION of DSESOLATION STANDING IN THE HLY PLACE.
run..
Please explain how the people could see inside a temple. Inside a holy place deep inside the templ, in 7- AD. To know they need to flee?
Sorry, But the AoD in matt is a future one. not a past one.It is the very same AoD "spoken of" in Matthew 24. There is no AoD "spoken of" (specifically) in Daniel 9.
There was no AOD in 70 ad. even you admit that it occurred before Christ.All three accounts of the Olivet Discourse are referring to the same thing - the same event circa 70 A.D.
BTW - it is not the return of Christ that cuts the 'Great Tribulation' short - it is the arrival of the Two Witnesses...![]()
And thats all your going to say. Not tell me what it actually says and what bible version I should use?Not the actual words - you have a currupted bible version.
Let the reader understand.It is curious that after Jesus says, "standing in the holy place", He (or the authors) adds, "Let the reader understand" (written in parentheses in English). That suggests there is something unusual about the preceding statement, that it is not "plain for all to comprehend". The phrase could refer to "the abomination of desolation", "the holy place", or perhaps the whole phrase, where "standing in" is the key object. In any case, we would do well not to impose the obvious interpretation to this phrase, and to hold lightly whatever interpretation we do hold. Luke does not include this statement, but his "condition" is plain and obvious.
I see there is no point in exploring possibilities with you; your mind is shut.Let the reader understand.
when you see this take place.
How could all of jerusalem see this take place?
In 70 AD. no way
Today, we not only have the means, we have the means of showing the Whole world when this will take place (it will be a public event)
You could give me possibilitiesI see there is no point in exploring possibilities with you; your mind is shut.
The "obvious" interpretation -- in view of what Christ says immediately after that -- is that the Abomination of Desolation will stand in the Holy Place of a FUTURE TEMPLE in Jerusalem (since He had already prophesied about the destruction of the existing temple). Then He tied in the Great Tribulation to this event. Which means that Christ Himself indicated (indirectly) that there is a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks of Daniel.In any case, we would do well not to impose the obvious interpretation to this phrase, and to hold lightly whatever interpretation we do hold.
In a discussion of end-times events, it usually means "abomination of desolation", as it does here. However, in a different context it could mean "Ancient of Days".
And since v.36 isn't still referring to "A4E," neither is the "AOD [singular, singular]" in Dan12:11 ("SET UP") referring BACK to his (that 11:31 DID speak of)
Guess again...And your wrong about the two witnesses, they do not cut it short. it continues even after they left.
Show me where it says this and I will show you why you are wrong...Jesus said immediately after tribulation he will return.
Sorry - I was in a hurry to get off of CC last night - I had some IRL things to do...And thats all your going to say. Not tell me what it actually says and what bible version I should use?
Yes way - when Jerusalem was being surrounded by armies...Let the reader understand.
when you see this take place.
How could all of jerusalem see this take place?
In 70 AD. no way
But, that is the problem - you can't just give something 5 seconds worth of thought and then shoot it down - you have to seriously consider all that is presented to you (which cannot be done in a few minutes or a few posts) long enough for/until it makes sense.You could give me possibilities
I know you have tried. But I do not see them fit.
You will not listen long enough...and explain why I do not see them fit.
yoursSo really, whose mind is shut?
Why do you keep making comments, yet never prove your point scriptural?Guess again...
Show me where it says this and I will show you why you are wrong...
Jesus said immediately after tribulation he will return.