Actually, the animal, for the longest time, was taking the place of the man.
The text says -1 John 2:2.
Pretty sure that was written before 1100.
Jesus wasn't a symbolic lamb. He was what all the lambs was pointing toward. That's why sacrifice ended with Him...no more need. God's wrath for sin has been satisfied.Not really. It was always intended to be animals in the old covenant, then one man as a symbolic Lamb one time.
A propitiation is a satisfaction for offense. Jesus satisfied the righteous anger of God over sin. Now He advocates for us having paid our debt in full.The text says -
"My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
2And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world."
This does say that Jesus Christ takes away our sins, so that God has no cause left to be angry and at war with us. But it does not seem to be saying that the transfer of our sins to Him and our justification are by means of a process of penal substitution, i.e. Jesus being punished in our place with the exact sum of punishment that the sum total of sins paid for deserves.
A Christus Victor interpretation of 1 John 2:2 would see the means by which our sins were taken away is our entry into union with Christ, the one who was sinlessly victorious over sin, the world and the devil so that God exalted Him to everlasting dominion over creation (Col. 2:10-15). Simply becoming "in the sinless Christ" through repentance and faith leaves our sins behind, because in Him is no sin.
Jesus wasn't a symbolic lamb.
He was what all the lambs was pointing toward. That's why sacrifice ended with Him...no more need.
God's wrath for sin has been satisfied.
Lamb is symbolic. But Jesus isn't. He is the sacrifice foreshadowed in Genesis when Abraham said God would provide Himself a Lamb. John the Baptist identified Him as well...the Lamb of God which takes away the sins of the world. Bulls and goats covered sin. Jesus took away our sins.Yes, he was. He was not a literal lamb.
Taht's called a shadow or type.
Nope. He will still have lots of wrath for the sinful. It is only those who believe and repent that will not face that wrath.
What was the message about who Jesus is that the first Christians preached as their first presentation of the gospel to the unchurched?Listen, please.
there is a thin red thread that starts in Genesis through Revelation. That is Jesus
Jesus was the promised Lamb God said he would bring forth when he stopped Abraham from sacrificing his son.
The Prophet Isaiah wrote of Him in 42, 53 chapters. Pslam Daniel Spoken of Him. There was many as there are today
, who attacked the Lord Jesus as God. it started in the Gnostic age, and Paul dealt with it. It raised up its ugly head after John died about 100 years. The Church Fathers addressed it and, with the help of the word of GOD, laid the foundational truth of The Lord Jesus as God fully and man fully. Not as an abstract, that His Resurrection was literal, not only spiritual.
You are looking at the effects. not the Cause of "penal substitution doctrine." FYI, many of the doctrines(teaching) were established from what is given in the word of God. And all doctrines must be judged by the word of GOD.
The foundational truth of Jesus as God is well-seen.To ensure He doesn't say to us, " I never knew you." WE must know Him as God. and worship him as God.
Repentance from going our own way and putting faith in the One God has accepted as sinless and has appointed King of kings and Lord of lords.A propitiation is a satisfaction for offense. Jesus satisfied the righteous anger of God over sin. Now He advocates for us having paid our debt in full.
On what basis do you believe God forgives sin?
If Paul converted people without preaching "Jesus is God" out of the gate, but they came to understand Jesus is God as they matured in Christ, why are religious people demanding that Jesus is "God" be preached and believed in before a hearer can truly become born again and a member within the body of Christ?
Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin. Forgiveness is based on the shed blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Sins are forgiven because they have been atoned for. God's justice demands payment for sin. God can't remit sin without payment and still be just.Repentance from going our own way and putting faith in the One God has accepted as sinless and has appointed King of kings and Lord of lords.
Lamb is symbolic. But Jesus isn't. He is the sacrifice foreshadowed in Genesis when Abraham said God would provide Himself a Lamb. John the Baptist identified Him as well...the Lamb of God which takes away the sins of the world. Bulls and goats covered sin. Jesus took away our sins.
The text says -
"My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
2And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world."
This does say that Jesus Christ takes away our sins, so that God has no cause left to be angry and at war with us. But it does not seem to be saying that the transfer of our sins to Him and our justification are by means of a process of penal substitution, i.e. Jesus being punished in our place with the exact sum of punishment that the sum total of sins paid for deserves.
A Christus Victor interpretation of 1 John 2:2 would see the means by which our sins were taken away is our entry into union with Christ, the one who was sinlessly victorious over sin, the world and the devil so that God exalted Him to everlasting dominion over creation (Col. 2:10-15). Simply becoming "in the sinless Christ" through repentance and faith leaves our sins behind, because in Him is no sin.
Which biblical text are you getting the idea of blood being a payment for sins? I can't remember where that is... if it is there at all. Where does the bible speak of the blood being a payment?Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin. Forgiveness is based on the shed blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Sins are forgiven because they have been atoned for. God's justice demands payment for sin. God can't remit sin without payment and still be just.
I think the key to this answer is in the weight in the authority of the Law given of Christ v. the Law given of Moses. In speaking of shadows of that which is to come, the Ark of the Covenant is a type also. And that contain within it, a bowl of manna, Aaron's rod, and the tablets which all of were placed under the mercy seat whereupon the once a year offering of the High Priest was made once a year at Yom Kippur (a day like Purim). Yet, even while professing that the true substance of the shadow has come, still so very many insist on pulling the rod, manna, and tablets back out from under the mercy seat.
So, when John the Baptist declares that Jesus is the Lamb of God which takes away the sins of the world, what is he teaching?The goat took sin away.
Lev 16:21 And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness:
Hebrews 9:22.Which biblical text are you getting the idea of blood being a payment for sins? I can't remember where that is... if it is there at all. Where does the bible speak of the blood being a payment?
That does not seem to answer my question, which was...
If Paul converted people without preaching "Jesus is God" out of the gate, but they came to understand Jesus is God as they matured in Christ, why are religious people demanding that Jesus is "God" be preached and believed in before a hearer can truly become born again and a member within the body of Christ?
1 Corinthians 11:1now that i have shown Jesus admitting He is THE LIVING GOD and Others have shown people were able to be in the Presence of God and not die, let's do talk about Obedience.
For one, i completely adhere to Following the Commands of Jesus from the Lord's Prayer to we must be Hearing, Following, Abiding in Him.
and my reasoning is simple.
Some Doctrines claim Obeying Christ is the thing we must be doing.
Some Doctrines claim Obeying Christ is WORKS.
well, one way or another, if You Obey Jesus, or you Obey the Doctrine that claims it is Works, you are STILL Obeying something.
we [[ONLY OBEY]] what we make as our God.
So, you are either Obeying God
or
you are Obeying Man Made Doctrine.
one of those, is the God/god of most people professing to be Saved.