I don't know LOL Oh " this is not worthy of ban."all of it, including, Book of Esther?
I don't know LOL Oh " this is not worthy of ban."all of it, including, Book of Esther?
I don't really know how someone like yourself and other moderators go about your process of determining what is worthy of a ban.I don't know LOL Oh " this is not worthy of ban."
I disagree.... there are people on here that absolutely do not WANT to be taught or enlightened. They will argue that day is night, from now on.I would probably be too lenient because I think any bad ideas and false doctrines can be destroyed by debating them.
good point madeI disagree.... there are people on here that absolutely do not WANT to be taught or enlightened. They will argue that day is night, from now on.
A forum does not lend itself to "defeating" someone in a discussion.... IMO, of course.
How much progress had been made "defeating" the banned person in this instance? None...
what i am talking about is Kosher Wine:
“In order for a wine to be deemed kosher, it must be made under the supervision of a rabbi."
Wines require some sort of mold (yeast) for fermentation; kosher wine must be made from a mold that has not been grown on bread, for instance sugar or fruit.
Personally, I don't come here to learn things from random people on the internet. But it seems like a lot of people come here to teach... and they get upset when they aren't accepted as teachers.
And while that's a strange thing, many of the ones that see them as teachers aren't very well educated in either the Word or in different methods of teaching. They just kinda' blast out their message and then condemn anyone who disagrees.
I think that it would be foolish for anyone to come here as if they've come to a school to be educated. Likewise, it would be foolish to think that one could come here to teach others as if they're professors at a school of higher learning. IMHO.
Nevertheless, I have learned a few things in my time here... but that's been from well ground individuals who present things from Scripture in a respectful manner.
I don't really know how someone like yourself and other moderators go about your process of determining what is worthy of a ban.
Not even my place to look at another Poster and posts and assume I deem it worthy of a ban.
I believe denying God and the Deity of God is a good solid reason for one, but, whatever the other reasons for a ban are, they are not privy to my understanding.
So, I just ask, when someone gets banned as to why.
It doesn't change anything for me, just gives me some idea to what moderators are looking for.
I would probably be too lenient because I think any bad ideas and false doctrines can be destroyed by debating them.
Foolish people make many mistakes that are way too easy to defeat them with.
But that's probably not how it works here and oh well lol...it is what it is...
i did look and finally saw in all he participated and can see where he did things based on [personal intention] rather than Biblical Fact.First Off, many times, a ban can happen and you are not subject to see why. We don't advertise the reason as to why because of privacy.
Many people have been banned and allowed back even after being banned many times. The Site Founder and Admin are very long suffering. Those typic that this Site has made known that will not tolerate have been said repeatedly.
CC holds to the "Trinity" doctrine as it is seen in the word of God. Those who don't are welcome to make their case yet CC doesn't allow and rightfully so, those who attack The Teaching and those who hold to it. If you look at the Thread and posting one can see why this person was banned. You may not agree, and that is fine.
reminds me of the saying many tend to use here, "future sins are forgiven," but that phrase is nowhere in the Bible.i did look and finally saw in all he participated and can see where he did things based on [personal intention] rather than Biblical Fact.
and I agree, i know very little about what all goes into and is factored before issuing a ban.
Don't get drunk on wine.just wondering here, how would grape skins and sugar, with no real type of yeast from barley, wheat, rice, grains [according to the LAW] would make wine stronger?
i can see this with Noah, he was not under the Law.
No, only getting drunk on it.Law prohibits wine?
Hi only does not want us to get drunk.wine is not just made from grapes, you can have rice wine, cider, gin, vodka, whiskey as fermented alcohoic drinks.
There is also beer. The Bible doesnt mention beer is wine, but it does refer to 'strong drink' possibly meaning alcoholic drinks. Confusing the issue is liquors and drinks known as spirits.
Because spirits DO affect people.
Fruit juice does not always need to be refrigerated, if kept in a properly sealed container, in a cool dark place it can keep.
People can be silly when it comes to alcohol, which is why there are restrictions, and signs saying dont serve alchol to minors, and why you cant drive under the influence or when you are intoxicated. People say drink 'responsibly' or know when to say when, but unfortunately for some the pressure to drink is strong. Some parents feed alcohol to their children to shut them up (gripe water for babies!) and then its no surprising been exposed to a taste of it, they become raging alcoholics and dependent on it later.
Does Jesus like it when you are drunk, ask yourself.
Never.
Jesus would not, and did not, ingest alcohol.
Jesus is all about purity of body and soul. There is nothing at all pure about alcohol. It is toxic to the human body. It is poison. It is great as an antiseptic, sure. It kills microorganisms and bacteria that it comes into contact with.
Good for human ingestion? Not so much. Take a good look at the fermentation process and think again if it makes any sense at all that Jesus would make, or serve, alcohol to anyone.
Alcohol is literally the feces of the yeast microorganism. The yeast consumes the sugar of fruits/vegetables and excretes alcohol. It also flatulates carbon dioxide so the carbonation, all the little bubbles in wine, is the gas that exits the yeast's rectum.
Does this sound like a holy and pure substance that Christ would enjoy or give to many people to ingest after they had all "well drunken"?
The fact is that wine in the Bible is referred to by a single English word when the original language used multiple words to refer to what we call wine and also what we call grape juice (unfermented).
Jesus never drank alcohol and what He actually made was pure, fresh grape juice from water - as much of a miracle as creating alcohol, if not more so.
Contrary to popular belief, the Bible speaks negatively of ingesting alcohol in many places.
George Cruikshank's painting "The Worship of Bacchus" was a very well known and sought after work in its day. It depicts how society uses alcohol and is destroyed by it. Bacchus is the ancient Greek god of wine and intoxication.
Here is a great link about the painting and what it was all about:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1120541/
Jesus is/was most certainly NOT a Jew and that was very irreverent.
Nobody stays sober by drinking alcohol.
And nobody drinks alcohol to stay sober.
Jesus never touched it in His life.
OP has been banned, so cannot respond to anything you say...Jesus was a Jew, and since you are mistaken about that, i can't trust what you say about alcohol either.
I have a question - I always thought that the Bible called grape juice "new wine." But Hosea 4:11 says "Infidelity, wine, and new wine take away the understanding." If new wine also takes away understanding, then maybe I was wrong about that?