I'm sorry that you are unaware of what you are talking about
Good bye
I'm sorry that you are unaware of what you are talking about
they're both called Wine
i am a Jew, i know the process of making this type of wine.Excuse me for asking... but where do you, and others, get this idea that the definition of the word "wine", throughout time, has any other meaning than fermented drink (grape or otherwise)?
I honestly have never heard of this idea outside of Christian, legalist, arguments. And have checked over the years in reference materials and the definition has remained consistently... that it's use is for fermented drink (i.e. alcoholic) only.
i am a Jew, i know the process of making this type of wine.
it's been the same way forever.
big difference in drinking juice on first day into wine skin and 3 weeks in wine skin.
really?Okay.
My understanding is that juice is not wine... just because you put it into a wineskin, doesn't change vocabulary.
But hey, it's your life... live it anyway you want.
really?
I. Ancient Evidence.
There is ancient evidence that non-alcoholic drinks were still called “wine.” In ancient times drinks were called “wine” that ranged anywhere from pure grape juice all the way to vinegar. There is evidence from ancient times that drinks called “wine” were prepared and consumed that were non-alcoholic.
it's scientific evidence.Could you cite the source, please? I suspect that it's religiously biased... denominationally so.
it's scientific evidence.
you know, just the Science of studying how people did things.
example:
look at how we DATE Parchment [Papyrus Paper]
we know the Oldest of times, this was glued
then thousand years later they sewed and glued
when Jesus was around, they doubled the papyrus leaves
why argue, what one Ancient Culture did for Writing or drinking wine, they ALL were doing because that was the only method.
Today, we use Trees
and Barrels to ferment.
this has nothing to do with denomination CRAP, and that's what Denominations are...CRAP!
i don't cite things because if you actually WANTED TO KNOW THE TRUTH, you would have found it yourself.Okay.
But I do find it interesting that you won't cite a source... I think that it is the policy of this site to do so, to avoid plagiarism.
i don't cite things because if you actually WANTED TO KNOW THE TRUTH, you would have found it yourself.
but, you are very comfy, in your Denominational Baloney.
lol, no, i am shocked that you would call yourself knowledgeable, but, not know the obvious information.Wow, you seem excited... I'll leave you to it, then.
lol, no, i am shocked that you would call yourself knowledgeable, but, not know the obvious information.
clearly, you, are a product of your denomination.
your first post attacked me.I think that's unjustified.
Firstly, I don't remember me saying that I am knowledgeable.
Nevertheless, I do, and have since my youth, enjoyed words and definitions... etymology as well. But it's more of a game than anything that would put in the ballpark of "knowledgeable".
Secondly, I don't belong to any denomination... at all.
Thirdly, I was merely asking for sources of any credible merit that holds a definition of "wine" as something other than a fermented drink.
You responded with your personal views and an uncited source.
Sounds alcoholic to me.OK, so now... post scriptures that say it was alcohol He was drinking....
You cannot prove from scripture Jesus was drinking alcoholic wine or freshly prepared wine which was not alcoholic due to not having fermented yet which is still called "wine" since it is the fruit of the vine.
your first post attacked me.
so, people only attack when they think what they know is more correct than the one they attack.
you said [like we are idiots]
Excuse me for asking... but where do you, and others, get this idea that the definition of the word "wine", throughout time, has any other meaning than fermented drink (grape or otherwise)?
^
this means, you think you know better.
and here, all along, you did not.
typical, justify your behavior.I'm not sure where you see an attack in that? Nor any implications that others (who hold your view) are idiots.
But views that wine can refer to unfermented drink are elusive to me... in short, they aren't to be found!?!
Except, in writings of dogmatic, religious groups and people.
I asked, you can't provide... thanks for trying.
typical, justify your behavior.
i can already guess which Denomination you belong to.