So which of these is the honest answer? The above one where you admit there is no comparable model for gravity keeping water on a spinning ball, or the below one (which you used prior to me calling you out) where you obfuscated this fact, and pretended that water on a ball would be dry "without a single droplet being shed due to centrifugal force". Yes, the statement was technically correct, but it did not answer the question asked, and does not give the real-world result (that gravity, rather than centrifugal force, will get that ball dry rather quickly). I won't even go into the deception of selecting a tennis ball in your example, rather than something like a basketball. Bold highlighting mine.