We are not required to have first obeyed the Mosaic Law in order to earn our salvation as the result - that was never the reason for why we should obey it, so I support Paul’s stance against the Judaizers.Except.... for his implication that Christians are required to keep the OT law in order to be saved...
That's just being a judiazer! View attachment 256913
Great, we have "Christians" who don't accept or follow Christianity, King James onlyists who aren't KJVO, prophets who aren't "prophets"; now we can add Judaizers who aren't Judaizers to the list.
There is also a huge difference in obeying in your own endeavor and obeying in the power of Christ.There is a huge difference between the position that we are required to obey God's commands (which many verses support) and the position that we are required to have first obeyed God's commands in order to earn our salvation (which many verses deny). We should not mistake the Bible speaking against a misunderstanding of the way to become saved as speaking against obeying God's commands. The fact that we are not required to earn our salvation as a wage by obeying God does not mean that we are not required to obey God.
Is there are room for discussion about what exactly was the problem with the Judaizers?
Something that is our own endeavor does not involve relying on anyone else, so it is contradictory to consider obediently relying on what God's instructions to be our own endeavor, but rather obediently relying on God's instructions is the way to obey by the power of Christ. Likewise, the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey God's instructions (Ezekiel 36:26-27).There is also a huge difference in obeying in your own endeavor and obeying in the power of Christ.
No one is refuting that obedience is required of Christians; only the source of the power to do so.
If that is the case, then it is necessary to distinguish between the good Judaizers who are teaching to follow Christ and the bad Juaizers that Paul was speaking against.Not as far as I'm concerned.
The fact that we are not required to earn our salvation as a wage by obeying God does not mean that we are not required to obey God.
If that is the case, then it is necessary to distinguish between the good Judaizers who are teaching to follow Christ and the bad Juaizers that Paul was speaking against.

I don't understand what you wrote. But as I've shared before, it is only as we walk in the Spirit that we will not sin...Galatians 5:16. To be in the Spirit is to be under the sway of Christ Himself...I live, yet not I; Christ liveth in me. It is literally Christ by the Spirit directing all of you.Something that is our own endeavor does not involve relying on anyone else, so it is contradictory to consider obediently relying on what God's instructions to be our own endeavor, but rather obediently relying on God's instructions is the way to obey by the power of Christ. Likewise, the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey God's instructions (Ezekiel 36:26-27).
All throughout the Bible, God wanted His people to repent and to return to obedience to the Mosaic Law, and even Christ began his ministry with that Gospel message, so it would be absurd to interpret Galatians 5:4 as Paul warning us against obeying God and saying that we will be cut off from Christ if we follow Christ. You should be quicker to think that you must have complete misunderstood Galatians 5:4 than to think that it makes perfect sense to interpret a servant of God as saying that.View attachment 256915
That's pretty hilarious!
Galatians 5:4
Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
God's Word is very clear... those seeking to be justified by the OT law are fallen from Grace and what Jesus did on the Cross is not applicable to them.
Sadly... your future is going to be very hot and tormenting unless you get born again and trust in what Jesus did instead of trying to justify yourself before the Lord by following the OT law.
All throughout the Bible, God wanted His people to repent and to return to obedience to the Mosaic Law,
Paul as saying that we should rebel against what God has commanded, then we should obey God rather than Paul
If I were lost and asked someone for directions, then by following their instructions I would be relying on them and thinking that I was relying on myself to save myself from being lost by following their instructions would not be giving credit where it is due. Likewise, it is not giving credit where it is due for someone to think that obediently relying on God's instructions is about trying to become self-righteous or earn our salvation.I don't understand what you wrote.
We do not sin when we are walking in the Spirit because the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey the Mosaic Law (Ezekiel 36:26-27), which is under the sway of Christ himself. Christ lived in obedience to the Mosaic Law, so that is the way that he lives when he lives in us.But as I've shared before, it is only as we walk in the Spirit that we will not sin...Galatians 5:16. To be in the Spirit is to be under the sway of Christ Himself...I live, yet not I; Christ liveth in me. It is literally Christ by the Spirit directing all of you.
I realize there are spiritual realities that Christians have yet to experience, so what I'm speaking concerning may not be something that you have encountered. But it is something clearly taught in scripture, and something that ought to be sought by all God's people.
I've already responded to this in post #65:NOT under the New Covenant......in the New Testament, many mentions of “the law” is actually referring to Law of Christ (aka the Law of Liberty) and is not talking about the old testament law. Christians are NOT called to keep or live under the old testament law, but we ARE called to live under the Law of Christ.
Ultimately this means we are called to abide In Christ which is living after the Spirit and not after the flesh, or to be spiritually minded and not carnally minded (see Romans 8). As we see in Romans 8, to be spiritually minded is life and peace but to be carnally minded is death which is separation from the Lord.
Galatians 6:2
Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.
1 Corinthians 9:21
To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
James 2:12
So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.
James 1:25
But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
Law of Christ
The phrase "the law of Christ" appears only in Galatians 6:2, although it is implied by the wording of 1 Corinthians 9:21 as well. In both places, its precise meaning is difficult to fix. In Galatians, Paul argues vigorously that the law given at Sinai makes no claim on those who believe in Christ, whether Gentile or Jew ( 2:15-21 ; Galatians 3:10-14 Galatians 3:23-26 ; 4:4-5 ; 4:21-5:6).
He then appeals to the Galatians to engage in ethical behavior by walking in the Spirit ( 5:16 Galatians 16 ), being lead by the Spirit ( 5:18 ), and fulfilling "the law of Christ" (ho nomos tou Christou) through bearing one another's burdens ( 6:2 ). In 1 Corinthians 9 Paul demonstrates how Christians should, out of love for the weaker brother or sister, refrain from demanding their rights.
By way of illustration Paul says in verses 19-23 that he adopts certain Jewish customs when among Jews, although he is not under the Jewish law, and that he adopts some Gentile customs when among Gentiles, although he is not without the law of God but rather "in the law of Christ" (ennomos Christou).
It seems fairly clear from these two texts that Paul uses the phrase to mean something other than the law given to Israel at Sinai and considered by most Jews to be their special possession.
Help is found in the prophets. In Isaiah 42:1-4 we read that God's chosen servant will one day establish justice throughout the earth and that "the coastlands will wait expectantly for His law" (NASB).
If we take this passage to refer to the Messiah, then we could paraphrase it by saying that the Christ, when he comes, will teach God's law to the Gentiles ("the coastlands"). Jeremiah 31:31-34 similarly predicts the coming of a time in which disobedient Israel will receive a new covenant, consisting of a law written on the heart and therefore obeyed (cf. Ezek 36:26-27 ).
Jesus' teaching, although standing in continuity with the law given at Sinai, nevertheless sovereignly fashions a new law. In some instances Jesus sharpens commandments ( Matt 5:17-48 ) and in others considers them obsolete ( Mark 7:17-19 ). On one occasion, having been asked to identify the greatest commandment, Jesus concurs with the Jewish wisdom of his time ( Mark 12:32-33 ) that the greatest commandments are to love God supremely and to love one's neighbor as oneself ( Mark 12:28-31 ). He breaks with tradition, however, by defining the term "neighbor" to mean even the despised Samaritan ( Luke 10:29-37 ).
Paul believed that the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ marked the beginning point of God's new covenant ( 2 Cor 3:1-18 ; Gal 4:21-31 ; cf. Rom 8:2 ). Like Isaiah, he believed that this covenant included the Gentiles ( Gal 3:7-20 ), and like Jeremiah he believed that it offered Israel a remedy for the curse that the old Sinaitic covenant pronounced on Israel's disobedience ( Gal 3:10-13 ).
In light of this, Paul may have understood the teaching of Christ as a new law. If so, then the correspondence between the ethical teaching of Jesus and Paul on many points (e.g., 1 Cor 7:10-11 / Mark 10:2-9 ; 1 Cor 9:14 / Luke 10:7 ; Rom 14:1-23 / Mark 7:18-19 ) is a matter of Paul's intention rather than happy accident. Paul's own admonition to fulfill the law of Christ by bearing one another's burdens provides both a pithy restatement of Jesus' summary of the law and an indication that Jesus' teaching fulfills prophetic expectations.
I'm not talking about salvation. I'm talking about 2 conditions within the redeemed: we are either walking in the Spirit or in the flesh. There are no other choices. One is empowered by God and is sinless. The other is in our own strength, and is sinful. There is no hybrid estate.If I were lost and asked someone for directions, then by following their instructions I would be relying on them and thinking that I was relying on myself to save myself from being lost by following their instructions would not be giving credit where it is due. Likewise, it is not giving credit where it is due for someone to think that obediently relying on God's instructions is about trying to become self-righteous or earn our salvation.
We do not sin when we are walking in the Spirit because the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey the Mosaic Law (Ezekiel 36:26-27), which is under the sway of Christ himself. Christ lived in obedience to the Mosaic Law, so that is the way that he lives when he lives in us.
False!
Luke 16:16
The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
Jesus taught the Gospel of the Kingdom... not the OT law to His followers
You are still confused concerning the difference between the OT law and the Law of Christ.
Hebrews 10:9
Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.
In Acts 5:32, the Spirit has been given to those who obey God, so obedience to God is part of the way to receive the Spirit, however, Galatians 3:1-2 denies that "works of the law" are part of the way to receive the Spirit, therefore that phrase does not refer to obedience to the Law of God. In Romans 3:27-31, Paul contrasted a law of works with a law of faith, so works of the law are of works while he said that our faith upholds God's law, so it is of faith, and a law that our faith upholds can't be referring to the same thing as the works of the law that are not of faith in Galatians 3:10-12. So you're not correctly identifying which law Paul was speaking against in Galatians. It should not make sense to interpret the Bible as speaking against obeying God.Since you are trying to keep the OT law... you are now required to keep ALL the law... that won't end well... just ask the Galatians!
The Law of Moses was never given as a way of turning sinners into saints, but rather it was given to describe the way that saints life as it describes the way that Christ lived. In 1 John 3:4-10, those who do not practice righteousness in obedience to the Law of Moses are not born again. In Romans 8:4-14, those who are born of the Spirit are contrasted with those who have minds set on the flesh who are enemies of God who refuse to submit to the Law of Moses.But, it could not turn sinners in to saints!
Galatians 3:21
if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Your law thingy bob isn't working out to well and is no longer applicable (Hebrews 10:9) because the Law of Christ is what New Testament believers live under.
You should become a New Testament believer and get born again!
Our salvation is from sin (Matthew 1:21) and it is by the Law of Moses that we have knowledge of what sin is (Romans 3:20), so while we do not earn our salvation as the result of having first obeyed it, living in obedience to it through faith in Jesus is nevertheless intrinsically the content of the gift of him saving us from not living in obedience to it. The works of the flesh are those that are done against the Mosaic Law, such as in Romans 8:4-7, those who walk in the Spirit are contrasted with those who have minds set on the flesh who are enemies of God who refuse to submit to the Mosaic Law, and in Galatians 5:19-23, everything listed as works of the flesh that are against the Spirit are also against the Mosaic Law while all of the fruits of the Spirit are in accordance with it. Obedience to God's word is the way to live under the influence of God's word made flesh.I'm not talking about salvation. I'm talking about 2 conditions within the redeemed: we are either walking in the Spirit or in the flesh. There are no other choices. One is empowered by God and is sinless. The other is in our own strength, and is sinful. There is no hybrid estate.
In both cases it is you living...either under your own control, or under the influence of Christ.