Christ started a new religion, with a new covenant at his death. Christians are not subject to the old covenant or its laws. We have the law of Christ mentioned in the NT.
The Bible does not say anything about the New Covenant being a different religion following a different God, but rather the New Covenant involve following the same God with the same Torah (Jeremiah 31:33, Ezekiel 36:26-27). Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to practice Judaism in obedience to the Torah by word and by example and it is absurd to think that the Law of Christ is something other than or contrary to what Christ taught.
It is not correct to have one foot in Judaism and one foot in Christianity.
I showed that Christianity at its origin was the form of Judaism that recognized Jesus as its prophesied Messiah, so you'll need to do more than insist otherwise.
Christianity was never Judaism. Some Jews who believed in Christ had trouble letting go of old ways but it did eventually happen for the majority. Paul's teaching were incredibly important in that.
Paul spoke about multiple categories of law other than the Law of God, so it is important to correctly identify which law he was speaking about in order to avoid making the mistake of interpreting him as speaking against following Christ. For example, in Romans 7:25-8:2, Paul contrasted the Law of God with the law of sin and contrasted the Law of the Spirit with the law of sin and death, and in Romans 3:27, Paul contrasted a law of works with a law of faith.
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law- Galatians 3:13
In Deuteronomy 27-28, it describes the blessing of living in obedience to God's law and the curse of lawlessness, so Christ freed us from the curse of lawlessness so that we can be free to enjoy the blessing of getting to living in obedience to it. In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself to redeem us from God's law, but in order to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to God's law is the way to believe in what Jesus accomplished through the cross.
the law entangles with the yoke of bondage- Galatians 5:1
God does not put His people into bondage, but rather He frees His people from bondage. If God saved the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt in order to put them under bondage to His law, then it would be for bondage that God sets us free, however, Galatians 5:1 says that it is for freedom that God sets us free. In Psalms 119:142, God's law is truth, and in John 8:31-36, it is sin in transgression of God's law the puts us in bondage while it is the truth that sets us free.
if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law - Galatians 5:18
God's law was given by God and the Spirit is God, so it would be absurd to think that if we are led by the Spirit that we aren't under the Law of the Spirit. Moreover, in Galatians 5:19-23, everything listed as works of the flesh that are against the Spirit are also against God's law while all of the fruits of the Spirit are in accordance with it. In Galatians 5:16-18, Paul described the desires of the flesh as causing us not to do the good that we want to do, which is how he described his struggle with the law of sin in Romas 7, so when we are led by the Spirit we are under the Law of God, but are not under the law of sin.
the strength of sin is the law- 1 Corinthians 15:56
Likewise, it is the law of sin that is the strength of sin, not the Law of God, which leads us to repent form our sins.
the law worketh wrath- Romans 4:15
The fact that disobedience to God's law brings wrath is not a very good reason to disobey it.
we are not under the law- Romans 6:15
Paul described the law that we are not under as being a law where sin had dominion over us, which does not describe the Law of God, which is a law where holiness, righteousness, and goodness have dominion over us (Romans 7:12), but rather it is the law of sin where sin had dominion over us. Furthermore, in Romans 6:15, being under grace does not mean that we are permitted to sin, and in 1 John 3:4, sin is the transgression of the Law of God, so we are still under it.
ye also are become dead to the law - Romans 7:4
We need to die to the law of sin in order to be free to obey the Law of God, not the other way around. God's word is His instructions for how to be unified with God's word made flesh, so it would be absurd to think that we need to die to God's word in order to becoming joined with Christ. Likewise, God's word is His instructions for how to bear fruit for Him, so it is absurd to think that we need to reject God's word in order to bear fruit for Him.
we are delivered from the law- Romans 7:6
we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter- Romans 7:6
Jesus made us free from the law of sin and death- Romans 8:2
In Romans 7:22-23, Paul delighted in obeying the Law of God, but contrasted that with the law of sin, which held him captive, and Romans 7:6 specifies that we have been set free from a law that held us captive. Verses that you interpret as referring to the Law of God should make sense for it to be referring to a law that Paul delighted in obeying, so it would be absurd to interpret Romans 7:6 as referring to the Law of God as if Paul delighted in being held captive to sin. Likewise, it would be absurd to interpret Romans 7:5 as referring to the Law of God as if Paul delighted in stirring up sinful passions in order to bear fruit unto death, but rather it is the law of sin that does that.
You should be much quicker to think that you must have misinterpreted all of the verses that you cited than to think that it makes perfect sense to interpret the Bible as promoting rebellion against God.