how, is it, you believe that Apostle Peter, was a first of something, let alone the Pope, and had assessors?Prove it then.
what original thought in YOUR Mind dwelt upon the idea of it before believing it?
how, is it, you believe that Apostle Peter, was a first of something, let alone the Pope, and had assessors?Prove it then.
Getting bullied by the Judaizers into not eating with gentile Christians is a cowardly move, you ought to know that being a bully yourself.again, don't be stupid..... I told you that disobedience (conforming to Judaizers, not wanting to eat unclean) did NOT constitute meekness or cowardliness...... which are the two qualities you assigned to Peter, and I disagreed with... quit playing word games, little man, you are not that good at it.
If you think RC priests can forgive sins against God, you are greatly mistaken.
Oh good catch! However, If I had to list all the questions YOU never answered I'd be here all day.Yes I did ask them. I even linked to them in my post. Click the word "these" in my first sentence of that post.
I can also give the link again since you may not be too keen on being proven wrong.
Click here.
Mathew 16:19 in light of Isiah 22.how, is it, you believe that Apostle Peter, was a first of something, let alone the Pope, and had assessors?
what original thought in YOUR Mind dwelt upon the idea of it before believing it?
You are deflecting. Plus I never claimed to have answered your questions, or that you did not ask questions you in fact actually did.Oh good catch! However, If I had to list all the questions YOU never answered I'd be here all day.![]()
Deflecting from WHAT? I've answered your questions, what do you want now? You're being a hypocrite, I've been on here trying to solve an issue and answer all the questions I catch, and you're barely answering any, and you're on here accusing me of presumptions and lying while lying and presuming things about me yourself. I RIGHTFULLY accused you and proved you to be a liar back a few pages.You are deflecting. Plus I never claimed to have answered questions, or that you did not ask questions you in fact actually did.
You have falsely accused me of not reading posts while you obviously
don't read posts then claim the content of those posts does not exist. LOL
No, you have repeatedly falsely accused me. And then made claims of yourself that were false as well, as I just proved.Deflecting from WHAT? I've answered your questions, what do you want now? You're being a hypocrite, I've been on here trying to solve an issue and answer all the questions I catch, and you're barely answering any, and you're on here accusing me of presumptions and lying while lying and presuming things about me yourself. I RIGHTFULLY accused you and proved you to be a liar back a few pages.
bottom line, i have no issue with the Greek, even with some misunderstandings here and there for both Covenants.What does a kjv-only-ist who considers kjv superior to the original languages think of that argument, @NTNT58 ?
Greek is a more precise language than Hebrew. perhaps the case is that God inspired the Greek but not the original? i gather that is the argument kjv-ists will. make, when they say that particular English translation is the only truly trustworthy scripture.
nevertheless if you find something God has done to be against your personal better judgement, i would question your judgement before questioning His.
and there is no copy of Matthew in Hebrew existing today known to mankind that isn't a later backwards translation from Greek.
the fact is that God preserved Matthew's gospel in Greek, and if it was first written in Hebrew, God did not see fit to preserve it in that form.
which specific part of Isaiah 22?Mathew 16:19 in light of Isiah 22.
You reject/do not support their (RCC) authority. So you make zero sense.That's what Jesus said in Mathew 23:3 - Obey the authority of the Pharisees.
You must obey all authority applicable to you, including church authority.
Just because Papists do wrong doesn't mean they don't have authority.
this is a complete Parallel of one another/like mirror image of same Verse prophesied in 2 ways.Isaiah 22:
כב וְנָתַתִּי מַפְתֵּחַ בֵּית-דָּוִד, עַל-שִׁכְמוֹ; וּפָתַח וְאֵין סֹגֵר, וְסָגַר וְאֵין פֹּתֵחַ.22
And the key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder; and he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open.
Matthew 16:
19. "To you I shall give the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven; everything that you will bind in the earth will have been bound in Heaven, and anything that you will release in the earth will have been released in Heaven."
even though, these 2 Verses do not mean, Peter, was ever a Pope.Isaiah 22:
כב וְנָתַתִּי מַפְתֵּחַ בֵּית-דָּוִד, עַל-שִׁכְמוֹ; וּפָתַח וְאֵין סֹגֵר, וְסָגַר וְאֵין פֹּתֵחַ.22
And the key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder; and he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open.
Matthew 16:
19. "To you I shall give the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven; everything that you will bind in the earth will have been bound in Heaven, and anything that you will release in the earth will have been released in Heaven."
Thank You God, for that Insight!
I know there's a meaning coming for me soon connecting these Verses.
Amen!
. . . . .even though, these 2 Verses do not mean, Peter, was ever a Pope.
i do want to Personally Thank You, for, tying these Two Verses together.
I feel like I just ate Manna!