WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Where in my original post was I being rude??? This was her response to my original post, I didn't even say anything else besides the post itself. I was not rude to ANYONE except rude people. She is ABSOLUTELY a troll... I presented an argument backed by mathematical facts, and she... told me to shut up, how rude and childish are you people!
Has anyone found secret messages in the bible?
- Thread starter NTNT58
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The way you have it written here ^ , I thought you meant (the words) "sin + forgiven" 70x7 mentions... but here's what I found when typing in "sin forgiven" in the kjv search box - https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=sin+forgiven&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1
... the results (shown at link) say, ' "sin" AND "forgiven" occurs 22 times in 10 verses in the KJV. '
Perhaps you can supply a brief explanation (without a link)... just a few words explaining why you think this "search" has come up with a differing number. Thanks. = )
... the results (shown at link) say, ' "sin" AND "forgiven" occurs 22 times in 10 verses in the KJV. '
Perhaps you can supply a brief explanation (without a link)... just a few words explaining why you think this "search" has come up with a differing number. Thanks. = )
NVM , I think I get it now... but the way you have it written "sin+forgiven" is usually how it's written when one has conducted a search using those words TOGETHER. (That's why I was confused. lol)
What you meant was "sin" and "forgiven" (separately) when added together, comes to "490" mentions all together (70x7=490):
-- https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=sin&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1 ("sin" - 448 times)
[and]
-- https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=forgiven&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1 ("forgiven" - 42 times)
448 + 42 = 490 (70 x 7)
What you meant was "sin" and "forgiven" (separately) when added together, comes to "490" mentions all together (70x7=490):
-- https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=sin&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1 ("sin" - 448 times)
[and]
-- https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=forgiven&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1 ("forgiven" - 42 times)
448 + 42 = 490 (70 x 7)
-
1
- Show all
oyster67 said:
Quite to the contrary. The guy finds elves and fairies behind every tree.
Nothing at all. Quite to the contrary. There are elves and fairies behind every tree.
Quite to the contrary. The guy finds elves and fairies behind every tree.
Nothing at all. Quite to the contrary. There are elves and fairies behind every tree.
Mathew 12:36 - But I tell you that everyone will have to give account on the day of judgment for every empty word they have spoken. 37 For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.”
Again, we've been over this... who are you to tell God where he can or can't put his divine signature? If this was only in original language, then it wouldn't be nearly as significant because a highly talented linguist could encode all kinds of messages into the original, but ONLY GOD can make a FUTURE translation from a foreign language not existing at the time filled with these messages.
-
2
- Show all
Which scripture??? There are DOZENS of different bible version and hundreds of thousands of manuscripts that contradict each other! Sure most of them agree on basics (not all, but most), but how would you know which one is the word of God because they can't all be.
There is no secret knowledge involved here, you are using logical fallacies to make it look like numerology or Gnosticism when it isn't.
There is no secret knowledge involved here, you are using logical fallacies to make it look like numerology or Gnosticism when it isn't.
-
3
- Show all
The "man" in both Matt13:44 and Matt13:45-46 is Jesus = ) (...not us).
[I don't know whether that's what "Magenta" was alluding to or not, in her post #74. ]
[I don't know whether that's what "Magenta" was alluding to or not, in her post #74.
]
Matthew 13:44
I've been working on this one for the past 2 days, but needed a verse for it so, thank you for the inspiration! .
-
1
- Show all
As to the OP (title) question, I've found something that is SIMILAR to those pointing out how:
-- the FIRST and the LAST letters of the Bible (in the Hebrew and the Greek) spell (together) "bn" (the Hebrew word meaning "SON"), so that both the FIRST and the LAST must be considered together in order to see it (i.e. both the OT and the NT)...
-- https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-1.htm "bə-rê-šîṯ " (first word--first letter)
-- "v" in Greek is our English "n" - https://biblehub.com/text/revelation/22-21.htm (see last word--last letter)
... so what I found was something similar to this ^ , but I'm not prepared to share it here.
[IOW, the evidence itself (in that example, for instance) is plain, in the text]
-- the FIRST and the LAST letters of the Bible (in the Hebrew and the Greek) spell (together) "bn" (the Hebrew word meaning "SON"), so that both the FIRST and the LAST must be considered together in order to see it (i.e. both the OT and the NT)...
-- https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-1.htm "bə-rê-šîṯ " (first word--first letter)
-- "v" in Greek is our English "n" - https://biblehub.com/text/revelation/22-21.htm (see last word--last letter)
... so what I found was something similar to this ^ , but I'm not prepared to share it here.
[IOW, the evidence itself (in that example, for instance) is plain, in the text]
As to the OP (title) question, I've found something that is SIMILAR to those pointing out how:
-- the FIRST and the LAST letters of the Bible (in the Hebrew and the Greek) spell (together) "bn" (the Hebrew word meaning "SON"), so that both the FIRST and the LAST must be considered together in order to see it (i.e. both the OT and the NT)...
-- https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-1.htm "bə-rê-šîṯ "
-- "v" in Greek is our English "n" - https://biblehub.com/text/revelation/22-21.htm
... so what I found was something similar to this ^ , but I'm not prepared to share it here.
[IOW, the evidence itself (in that example, for instance) is plain, in the text]
-- the FIRST and the LAST letters of the Bible (in the Hebrew and the Greek) spell (together) "bn" (the Hebrew word meaning "SON"), so that both the FIRST and the LAST must be considered together in order to see it (i.e. both the OT and the NT)...
-- https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-1.htm "bə-rê-šîṯ "
-- "v" in Greek is our English "n" - https://biblehub.com/text/revelation/22-21.htm
... so what I found was something similar to this ^ , but I'm not prepared to share it here.
[IOW, the evidence itself (in that example, for instance) is plain, in the text]