I am not sure. But I speak English mostly.i think the english/kings army during the Crusades forced people to speak it and it's been common sense. it's probably easier than some native Languages to others,
I am not sure. But I speak English mostly.i think the english/kings army during the Crusades forced people to speak it and it's been common sense. it's probably easier than some native Languages to others,
In any case, we have English to speak, like your Aramaic translation.me too
I grew up with English from the Greek for Matthew through Revelation. Then there is the question of if anyone translated into Hebrew. So I am still not sure.but anyways, now you know, even written in 77 AD, Papais, documented about the Aramaic being original Language and we have Jesus' Own Words saying He is the LIVING GOD.
but that is proof Jesus said it.
just like we have history books that tell us what's happened hundreds and thousands of years ago [because historians kept notes], we have men who knew the Disciples of Jesus, became Disciples of the Disciples of Jesus, and they wrote down what the Disciple of Jesus would teach them.I grew up with English from the Greek for Matthew through Revelation. Then there is the question of if anyone translated into Hebrew. So I am still not sure.
You said that the Aramaic was left in the text when translated. I don't know how you would know that.just like we have history books that tell us what's happened hundreds and thousands of years ago [because historians kept notes], we have men who knew the Disciples of Jesus, became Disciples of the Disciples of Jesus, and they wrote down what the Disciple of Jesus would teach them.
so, what i am presenting to you, is almost 2,000 years old, and solid factual evidence.
no, i said, a man named Jerome, copied it when he was given all scrolls to create the Latin Vulgate Bible. and one of these Scrolls was Gospel of Matthew written in Hebrew. for his own notes, Jerome, copied it. so, Jerome's copy of the original Gospel of Matthew written in Hebrew, it's been secured and saved in perfect ink on parchment since 340 AD.You said that the Aramaic was left in the text when translated. I don't know how you would know that.
Interesting. It would be interesting to look at Matthew through Revelation and find out what the original language is for each book or letter or writing.no, i said, a man named Jerome, copied it when he was given all scrolls to create the Latin Vulgate Bible. and one of these Scrolls was Gospel of Matthew written in Hebrew. for his own notes, Jerome, copied it. so, Jerome's copy of the original Gospel of Matthew written in Hebrew, it's been secured and saved in perfect ink on parchment since 340 AD.
But I believe that what I find in the Bible is true.
You do not accept the Scriptures. So weird to see you think you do.I accept the scriptures
Some English translations take the Latin into account. I don't know much about it.and also remember:
you do realize your English Bible comes from Jerome's Latin Vulgate?
to discredit Jerome for the Hebrew Gospel of Matthew, is to discredit your own English Bible.
so, Jerome, is important, to anyone who has a Bible and reads it and believes what it says.
Why are you challenging me. I am a Christian. So, I believe the Bible.You do not accept the Scriptures. So weird to see you think you do.
but, for one moment, to entertain my curiosity, if you come to believe, because it is fact, that Jesus said, I AM THE LIVING GOD 10 times, what perspective, would that do towards your view of Jesus?Some English translations take the Latin into account. I don't know much about it.
I would wonder if it would affect my view of Jesus is God or my distrust of the Trinity doctrine. For example, it wouldn't be Jesus saying I am God the Son. Or, I am the Son, God.but, for one moment, to entertain my curiosity, if you come to believe, because it is fact, that Jesus said, I AM THE LIVING GOD 10 times, what perspective, would that do towards your view of Jesus?
Remember, on Earth, the I AM THE LIVING GOD, is Who He is, but He is [[also]] in Emptied Version of the I AM THE LIVING GOD.I would wonder if it would affect my view of Jesus is God or my distrust of the Trinity doctrine. For example, it wouldn't be Jesus saying I am God the Son. Or, I am the Son, God.
I am still not sure.Remember, on Earth, the I AM THE LIVING GOD, is Who He is, but He is [[also]] in Emptied Version of the I Am THE LIVING GOD.
This shows us He came to accomplish more things than being a Sacrifice. He taught us how to Pray, how to be like Followers of God, He gave us a Father to Pray to, and we always close our Prayer in Jesus Name. He showed us life is Trials but those who Keep the Faith, WIN! then He destroyed Death and Hell and Resurrected. so, He came, Emptied of being the COMPLETE I AM THE LIVING GOD, and showed You and Me how to be Followers of God!
just take it into consideration.I am still not sure.
I think I said that Jesus said I am the living God before I heard this from you. I don't know how. But I don't know if it is just what I am up against.
Do you mean what you have already presented or something else something more?just take it into consideration.
it will not hurt my feelings if you don't see it for what i present it to be.
but, that also means, i would not present something to you that has not been proven fact by Bible Scholars that get paid to take all Versions and formulate them into one fluid meaning. plus, it includes ancient documentation from those literally first hand knowledge to the Source.
there is more. 3 other documents providing more proof of Gospel of Matthew being written originally in Hebrew and then struggled to translate to Greek. another document confirming Mark writing for Peter in Gospel of Mark.Do you mean what you have already presented or something else something more?